Introduction. Academic responsibility consists in the duty of higher education providers to their students. By implementing academic responsibility, these providers respond to the demands of their society. The purpose of this article is to explore and analyse: implementation of education and teaching; mentoring; service to the university; research, publication; community service and ch anges. Materials and Methods. A qualitative research approach, employing the case study method, was used. Data were obtained from in-depth interviews from lecturers and students, field observations, as well as collating and reviewing documents. Results. The results of the study show that, in the implementation of education and teaching, the planning stage refers to the process of drafting the semester lesson plan. Student-centred active and participatory learning models are maintained; in mentoring, the guiding process simultaneously combines academic guidance, career guidance and personal-social guidance. While service provision is prioritised as one of the important educational aspects, in the implementation of research, it improves the ability of lecturers to research; in publications, to meet writing standards, peer assessment standards and documentation standards; in community service, it consists at the level of how to devote the knowledge possessed by the academic community to the progress of society; in change leadership, it involves technology, structure and human resources. Discussion and Conclusion. There is a commitment to support the implementation of academic responsibility of higher education through engagement in teaching, mentoring, serving the university, discovering, publishing, truth-telling, serving the community and leading change. This academic process shows the value of commitment to a better quality of higher education.

Implementasi Badan layanan Umum (BLU) pada perguruan tinggi memberikanpeluang bagi lembaga ini untuk menerapkan manajemen keuangan secara lebihluwes yang menekankan pada produktivitas,efisiensi, dan efektivitas. Penganggaranberbasis kinerja (performance based budgeting) membuat penyusunan dan penerapantidak hanya berdasarkan input dan proses, tetapi juga output. Evaluasi merupakantahapan penting kebijakan guna membuat keputusan yang sesuai dalam ranah publikterutama pada perguruan tinggi untuk meningkatkan layanan kepada para pemangkukepentingan (stakeholders). Ada banyak model-model evaluasi kebijakan yang dapatdigunakan sesuai dengan jenis kebijakan yang diterapkan.

The article purposes to describe some problems of ethical issues of writing for academic paper as part of academic responsibility. The dissemination of academicswriting do through international journals. There are some several reasons, such as enhancing personal and university level, widening networking, implementing a better academic atmosphere, and academic work. However, Indonesia academics are still have some problems in academic work especially writing international journal, such as lack of ability in writing and low research. This case study was conducted qualitatively in 2017 with data collection method through in-depth interviews, observation, and document studies. The result shows that hence, the article discusses the unethical practice in academic writing as misconduct, fabrication, falsification and plagiarism or handling the prevention. In sumthat paper involves two aspect discourses: the unethical of academic writing and how to avoid this worse work., therefore, quality of the journal reflects the quality of the writing.