Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) technologies are emerging as an important adjunct in organ preservation and transplantation. NMP can enable the reduction or avoidance of cold ischemia and allows for pretransplant measurement of function and metabolic status to assess the suitability of the organ for transplantation. The key requirement of NMP is to provide an environment that is protective to the organ, ensures optimal oxygen delivery and supports metabolic function. Red blood cell‐based solutions, artificial hemoglobin solutions, and acellular solutions have all been utilized in NMP. However, there is no clear consensus on perfusion protocols. A period of NMP after hypothermic preservation is the most commonly used strategy. As an alternative, several groups have developed and tested the feasibility of more prolonged periods of NMP. There are only a few reports of the application of NMP in clinical kidney transplantation and each uses different approach and conditions. This review details the rationale for NMP protocols considering duration of NMP and different perfusate compositions in experimental and clinical models. We also include a discussion on the mechanistic action of NMP, comparison of subnormothermic and hypothermic conditions, the different logistical approaches and future requirements.
Kidney transplantation is the optimal treatment for patients with kidney Q5 failure; however, early detection and timely treatment of graft injury remain a challenge. Precise and noninvasive techniques of graft assessment and innovative therapeutics are required to improve kidney transplantation outcomes. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are lipid bilayer-delimited particles with unique biosignatures and immunomodulatory potential, functioning as intermediaries of cell signalling. Promising evidence exists for the potential of EVs to develop precision diagnostics of graft dysfunction, and prognostic biomarkers for clinician decision making. The inherent targeting characteristics of EVs and their low immunogenic and toxicity profiles combined with their potential as vehicles for drug delivery make them ideal targets for development of therapeutics to improve kidney transplant outcomes. In this review, we summarize the current evidence for EVs in kidney transplantation, discuss common methodological principles of EV isolation and characterization, explore upcoming innovative approaches in EV research, and discuss challenges and opportunities to enable translation of research findings into clinical practice.
During development, nephron structures are derived from a SIX2+ stem cell population. After 36 weeks of gestation, these cells are exhausted, and no new nephrons are formed. We have previously described a non-invasive strategy to isolate and expand the native SIX2+ kidney stem cells from the urine of preterm neonates, named neonatal kidney stem/progenitor cells (nKSPC). Here, we investigated the safety and feasibility of administering nKSPC into human kidneys discarded for transplantation during normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) and evaluated the regenerative and immunomodulatory potential of nKSPC treatment. We found that nKSPC administration during NMP is safe and feasible. Interestingly, nKSPC induced the de novo expression of SIX2 in proximal tubular cells of the donor kidneys and upregulated regenerative markers such as SOX9 and VEGF. This is the first time that SIX2 re-expression is observed in adult human kidneys. Moreover, nKSPC administration significantly lowered levels of kidney injury biomarkers and reduced inflammatory cytokine levels via the tryptophan-IDO-kynurenine pathway. In conclusion, nKSPC is a novel cell type to be This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.