We computationally investigated the role of the Omicron RBD mutations on its structure and interactions with surrounding domains in the spike trimer as well as with ACE2. Our results suggest...

The Ebola virus (EBOV) is a filamentous virus that acquires its lipid envelope from the plasma membrane of the host cell it infects. EBOV assembly and budding from the host cell plasma membrane are mediated by a peripheral protein, known as the matrix protein VP40. VP40 is a 326 amino acid protein with two domains that are loosely linked. The VP40 N-terminal domain (NTD) contains a hydrophobic α-helix, which mediates VP40 dimerization. The VP40 C-terminal domain has a cationic patch, which mediates interactions with anionic lipids and a hydrophobic region that mediates VP40 dimer−dimer interactions. The VP40 dimer is necessary for trafficking to the plasma membrane inner leaflet and interactions with anionic lipids to mediate the VP40 assembly and oligomerization. Despite significant structural information available on the VP40 dimer structure, little is known on how the VP40 dimer is stabilized and how residues outside the NTD hydrophobic portion of the α-helical dimer interface contribute to dimer stability. To better understand how VP40 dimer stability is maintained, we performed computational studies using per-residue energy decomposition and site saturation mutagenesis. These studies revealed a number of novel keystone residues for VP40 dimer stability just adjacent to the α-helical dimer interface as well as distant residues in the VP40 CTD that can stabilize the VP40 dimer form. Experimental studies with representative VP40 mutants in vitro and in cells were performed to test computational predictions that reveal residues that alter VP40 dimer stability. Taken together, these studies provide important biophysical insights into VP40 dimerization and may be useful in strategies to weaken or alter the VP40 dimer structure as a means of inhibiting the EBOV assembly.

We computationally investigated the role of the Omicron RBD mutations on its structure and interactions with ACE2. Our results suggest that, compared to the WT and Delta, the mutations in the Omicron RBD facilitate a more efficient RBD opening and ACE2 attachment. These effects, combined with antibody evasion, may contribute to its dominance over Delta. While the Omicron RBD escapes most antibodies from prior infections, epitope analysis shows that it harbors sequences with significantly improved antigenicity compared to other variants, suggesting more potent Omicron-specific neutralizing antibodies.

The emergence and the high transmissibility of the XBB.1.5 and XBB.1.16 subvariants of the SARS-CoV-2 omicron has reignited concerns over the potential impact on vaccine efficacy for these and future variants. We investigated the roles of the XBB.1.5 and XBB.1.16 mutations on the structure of the spike protein’s receptor-binding domain (RBD) and its interactions with the host cell receptor ACE2. To bind to ACE2, the RBD must transition from the closed-form to the open-form configuration. We found that the XBB variants have less stable closed-form structures that may make the transition to the open-form easier. We found that the mutations enhance the RBD–ACE2 interactions in XBB.1.16 compared to XBB.1.5. We observed significant structural changes in the loop and motif regions of the RBD, altering well-known antibody-binding sites and potentially rendering primary RBD-specific antibodies ineffective. Our findings elucidate how subtle structural changes and interactions contribute to the subvariants’ fitness over their predecessors.

No abstract