Sunscreens have been advocated as an important means of preventing skin cancer. Ultraviolet radiation induced immunosuppression is recognized as an important event in skin cancer development, yet the effectiveness of sunscreens in protecting the human immune system from ultraviolet radiation (i.e. ultraviolet radiation) is still unclear. The only currently accepted method of sunscreen rating is the sun protection factor system based on the prevention of erythema. We determined immune protection factors for six commercially available sunscreens using a nickel contact hypersensitivity model in humans. Both sun protection factor and immune protection factor testing was performed using the same solar simulated ultraviolet radiation source and dose-responses were used to determine endpoints both with and without sunscreens. We found that the immune protection factor did not correlate with the sun protection factor; however, immune protection factor was significantly correlated to the ultraviolet A protective capability of the sunscreens, indicating that sunscreen protection from ultraviolet A is important for the prevention of ultraviolet immunosuppression, when there is constant ultraviolet B protection. We recommend that sunscreens should be rated against their immune protective capability to provide a better indication of their ability to protect against skin cancer.
Solar-simulated ultraviolet radiation (ssUV) suppresses immunity in humans. The ultraviolet B (UVB) waveband is recognized as immunosuppressive; however the relative significance of UVA to ssUV immunosuppression is unknown. We created dose and time-response curves for UVB-, UVA-, and ssUV-induced suppression of memory immunity to nickel in humans. UVB caused immunosuppression within 24 h. UVA immunosuppression required 48 h and was normalized by 72 h. UVB alone accounts for ssUV immunosuppression at 24 h, but both UVB and UVA contributed at 48 h. By 72 h neither waveband accounted for ssUV immunosuppression. An interaction between these wavebands was therefore the major contributor. To confirm this dose-response curves were used to determine immune protection factors (IPF) for sunscreens with nickel challenge 72 h following ssUV. A sunscreen with good UVA protection had an IPF twice that of a poor UVA protector, despite providing similar protection from sunburn. Thus UVA was a major contributor to ssUV-induced immunosuppression at 72 h but only with the cooperation of UVB. Hence, UVB initiates immunosuppressive signals within 24 h, followed by UVA at 48 h, then an interaction between UVB and UVA. By 72 h following ssUV exposure, neither UVB nor UVA, but an interaction between them is the major cause of sunlight-induced immunosuppression.
We have examined the mechanism by which solar-simulated ultraviolet radiation (ssUV) suppresses memory immunity to nickel in allergic humans. In initial studies, we used inbred mice to determine the contribution of different wavebands to sunlight-induced immunosuppression. We found that low dose UVA can enhance memory, medium dose UVA (half the amount in one minimum erythemal dose of ssUV) is immunosuppressive, but higher doses protect from UVB. This is genetically dependent, as it is not observed in all mouse strains. UVA caused a similar dose-related change in recall immunity in humans. ssUV dose responses determined the limits of protection provided by sunscreens from immunosuppression in humans. Immune protection factors calculated from these data correlated with UVA protection, but not with sun protection factor, showing that in commercial sunscreens that provide good UVB protection, UVA protection limits prevention of immunosuppression. N(G)-monomethyl-l-arginine acetate (l-NMMA) was used to inhibit nitric oxide (NO) production and T4N5 liposomes containing T4 endonuclease V to enhance DNA repair. Sub-erythemal ssUV caused a dose-related local suppression of recall immunity to nickel in humans. l-NMMA and the liposomes protected the nickel reaction, suggesting that NO and DNA damage are mediators of UV-induced immunosuppression in humans.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.