Robotic surgery has the features to represent the future of surgery, considering the rapid evolution of its technology and the resulting in the surgical field. In the last years, the robotic technique in thoracic surgery has progressively become widespread in the word, particularly for the treatment of the mediastinal and pulmonary lesions. The development of technology in the robotic system has been associated with the improvement of intraoperative and postoperative results. Due to the satisfying results and increasing experience and confidence with the robotic technique, surgeons are consequently enlarging the surgical indication, moving to increasingly challenging cases. Thoracic robotic surgery is being affirmed as a safe technique also for those complex cases, which in the past were considered a matter solely for open surgery. In fact, robotic surgery is increasingly associated with positive surgical results and guarantees less traumatism and a fast recovery to the patients. These positive results have resulted from the evolution of the technique, which has developed in parallel with the evolution of the technology, exploiting to its best the latest features of the robotic system. These features, such as the fluorescence-detection tool or the robotic stapler, have been aiding the surgeon to maximise the safety and feasibility of the application of the robotic technique to thoracic surgery.
OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to analyse the outcomes in 53 patients with thymoma, 34 of whom had myasthenia gravis (MG), who were treated with robotic surgery. The oncological outcomes of the whole series of patients were analysed. Furthermore, because consistent data are not yet available in the literature, the main focus was the analysis of the neurological results of the patients affected by MG and thymoma. METHODS The clinical outcomes of 53 patients with a diagnosis of thymoma who underwent robotic thymectomy between January 2014 and December 2019 in our institution were collected and evaluated; 34 of these patients had a concomitant diagnosis of MG. The neurological status of the patients was determined from a clinical evaluation according to the Osserman classification and on pre- and post-surgery Myasthenia Gravis Composite scores, whereas neurological clinical outcomes were assessed using the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America Post-Intervention Score. Reduction of steroid therapy was also considered. The recurrence rate, adjuvant radiotherapy and overall survival of the patients with a thymoma were evaluated. RESULTS Neurological outcomes: improvement of the clinical conditions was obtained in 26 patients (76.5%) following the operation: complete stable remission was observed in 5 patients (14.7%), pharmacological remission in 10 (29.4%) and minimal manifestation in 11 (32.3%). Four patients (11.8%) exhibited no substantial change from the pretreatment clinical manifestations or reduction in MG medication and 4 (11.8%) patients experienced worsening of clinical conditions. In 21 patients (61.7%) a reduction of the dosage of steroid therapy was obtained. Oncological outcomes: at an average follow-up of 36 months, the overall survival was 96%, 4 patients (7.5%) had pleural relapses and 12 patients (22.6%) underwent postoperative radiotherapy, according to their stage. In accordance with Masaoka staging, 34% were in stage I, 56.6% in stage II and 9.4% in stage III CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that robotic surgical treatment of patients with thymoma and concomitant MG is effective in improving the neurological outcomes. Moreover, the oncological results obtained in this series confirm the efficacy of robotic surgery for the treatment of thymic malignancies, with results in line with those of open surgery. However, due to the indolent growth of thymomas, further observations with longer follow-up are necessary.
No abstract
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.