Chronic venous disease (CVD) is a common condition with major health consequences that is associated with poor long-term prognosis, significant socioeconomic impact, disabling symptoms and reduced quality of life. To provide practical guidance for diagnosis and management of CVD, a Delphi panel of 5 experts in steering committee and 28 angiologists/vascular surgeons met with the major aim of providing a supplement for established national and international guidelines. A total of 24 statements were voted upon in two rounds, of which consensus was reached on 22 statements, indicating a high level of overall agreement. Consensus was reached on 7 of 8 statements relative to diagnosis (CEAP classification, diagnostic tools, QoL assessment, diagnostic imaging) and on 15 of 16 statements on management (conservative treatments, compressive therapy, pharmacological therapy, surgical treatment). The results of the consensus reached are discussed herein from which it is clear that diagnostic and management approaches utilising personalised therapies tailored to the individual patient should be favoured. While it is clear that additional studies are needed on many aspects of diagnosis and management of CVD, the present Delphi survey provides some key recommendations for clinicians treating CVD that may be useful in daily practice.

MRI can assess plaque composition and has demonstrated an association between some atherosclerotic risk factors (RF) and markers of plaque vulnerability in naive patients. We aimed at investigating this association in medically treated asymptomatic patients. This is a cross-sectional interim analysis (August 2013–September 2016) of a single center prospective study on carotid plaque vulnerability (MAGNETIC study). We recruited patients with asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis (US stenosis > 30%, ECST criteria), receiving medical treatments at a tertiary cardiac rehabilitation. Atherosclerotic burden and plaque composition were quantified with 3.0 T MRI. The association between baseline characteristics and extent of lipid-rich necrotic core (LRNC), fibrous cap (CAP) and intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) was studied with multiple regression analysis. We enrolled 260 patients (198 male, 76%) with median age of 71-y (interquartile range: 65–76). Patients were on antiplatelet therapy, ACE-inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers and statins (196–229, 75–88%). Median LDL-cholesterol was 78 mg/dl (59–106), blood pressure 130/70 mmHg (111–140/65–80), glycosylated hemoglobin 46 mmol/mol (39–51) and BMI 25 kg/m2 (23–28); moreover, 125 out of 187 (67%) patients were ex-smokers. Multivariate analysis of a data-set of 487 (94%) carotid arteries showed that a history of hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, hypertension or smoking did not correlate with LRNC, CAP or IPH. Conversely, maximum stenosis was the strongest independent predictor of LRNC, CAP and IPH (p < 0.001). MRI assessment of plaque composition in patients on treatment for asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis shows no correlation between plaque vulnerability and the most well-controlled modifiable RF. Conversely, maximum stenosis exhibits a strong correlation with vulnerable features despite treatment.

No abstract

Carotid atherosclerosis is a cause of brain ischemic events. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) can assess plaque vulnerability. We investigated atherosclerosis vulnerability in relation to plaque location, eccentricity and vessel remodeling. Methods-Baseline CMR evaluations of the MAGNETIC observational study, were analyzed. We quantitated with MRI-Plaque View™, vessel lumen/wall and vulnerable plaque components of a 32-mm segment of common carotid artery (12 mm), bulb (8 mm) and internal carotid artery (12 mm). Lipid-rich necrotic core [LRNC], fibrous cap [CAP] and intraplaque hemorrhage [IPH] were expressed as percent of wall area. Results-A data-set of 8080 sections of adequate quality in 260 patients (198 male [76%], median age 71 years [65–76]), were analyzed. Patients were on therapy with antiplatelet, ACE-inhibitors/ARB and statins (196–229 out of 260 [75–88%]). We found significant differences in plaque composition according to longitudinal and circumferential location, eccentricity and vessel remodeling (table). At multivariate regression analysis, including classical RF and atherosclerotic burden, we found an independent association of: LRNC and IPH with longitudinal location, eccentricity and positive remodeling, and of CAP with eccentricity (p<0.001 for all). Lipid-rich necrotic core Fibrous cap Intraplaque hemorrhage Longitudinal distribution Common carotid artery 4% [1–10] p<0.001 6% [4–11] p<0.001 0% [0–3] p<0.001 Carotid bulb 7% [3–13] 9% [5–13] 1% [0–4] Internal carotid artery 3% [0–10] 7% [4–11] 0% [0–1] Circunferenzial location Antero-medial 4% [0–11] p<0.001 7% [4–12] p=0.07 0% [0–2] p<0.001 Antero-lateral 6% [1–12] 8% [5–12] 1% [0–4] Postero-lateral 5% [0–11] 7% [4–12] 0% [0–3] Postero-medial 5% [0–11] 7% [4–12] 0% [0–1] Plaque eccentricity Concentric 3% [0–9] p<0.001 7% [4–11] p<0.001 0% [0–2] p<0.001 Eccentric 9% [4–15] 9% [5–13] 1% [0–4] Remodelling pattern Negative 4% [0–10] p<0.001 7% [4–11] p<0.001 0% [0–2] p<0.001 Positive 7% [3–13] 8% [5–13] 1% [0–4] Plaque eccentricity was defined as eccentricity index (EI = [maximum wall thickness − minimum wall thickness]/maximum wall thickness) in the highest quartile. Positive remodeling was defined as remodeling index (= [vessel cross-sectional area − reference area]/cross-sectional area) in the highest quartile. Conclusions Carotid atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability seems to be independently associated with longitudinal location, plaque eccentricity and vessel positive remodeling. Acknowledgement/Funding Bayer AG, Leverkusen, Germany

Background Atherosclerosis vulnerability regression has been evidenced mostly in randomized clinical trials with intensive lipid‐lowering therapy. We aimed to demonstrate vulnerability regression in real life, with a comprehensive quantitative method, in patients with asymptomatic mild to moderate carotid atherosclerosis on a secondary prevention program. Methods and Results We conducted a single‐center prospective observational study (MAGNETIC [Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Gold Standard for Noninvasive Evaluation of Atherosclerotic Involvement of Carotid Arteries]): 260 patients enrolled at a cardiac rehabilitation center were followed for 3 years with serial magnetic resonance imaging. Per section cutoffs (95th/5th percentiles) were derived from a sample of 20 consecutive magnetic resonance imaging scans: (1) lipid‐rich necrotic core: 26% of vessel wall area; (2) intraplaque hemorrhage: 12% of vessel wall area; and (3) fibrous cap: (a) minimum thickness: 0.06 mm, (b) mean thickness: 0.4 mm, (c) projection length: 11 mm. Patients with baseline magnetic resonance imaging of adequate quality (n=247) were classified as high (n=63, 26%), intermediate (n=65, 26%), or low risk (n=119, 48%), if vulnerability criteria were fulfilled in ≥2 contiguous sections, in 1 or multiple noncontiguous sections, or in any section, respectively. Among high‐risk patients, a conversion to any lower‐risk status was found in 11 (17%; P =0.614) at 6 months, in 16 (25%; P =0.197) at 1 year, and in 19 (30%; P =0.009) at 3 years. Among patients showing any degree of carotid plaque vulnerability, 21 (16%; P =0.014) were diagnosed at low risk at 3 years. Conclusions This study demonstrates with a quantitative approach that vulnerability regression is common in real life. A secondary prevention program can promote vulnerability regression in asymptomatic patients in the mid to long term.