The influence of light on living organisms is critical, not only because of its importance as the main source of energy for the biosphere, but also due to its capacity to induce changes in the behaviour and morphology of nearly all forms of life. The common soil fungus Trichoderma atroviride responds to blue light in a synchronized manner, in time and space, by forming a ring of green conidia at what had been the colony perimeter at the time of exposure (photoconidiation). A putative complex formed by the BLR-1 and BLR-2 proteins in T. atroviride appears to play an essential role as a sensor and transcriptional regulator in photoconidiation. Expression analyses using microarrays containing 1438 unigenes were carried out in order to identify early light response genes. It was found that 2?8 % of the genes were light responsive: 2 % induced and 0?8 % repressed. Expression analysis in blr deletion mutants allowed the demonstration of the occurrence of two types of light responses, a blr-independent response in addition to the expected blr-dependent one, as well as a new role of the BLR proteins in repression of transcription. Exposure of T. atroviride to continuous light helped to establish that the light-responsive genes are subject to photoadaptation. Finally, evidence is provided of red-light-regulated gene expression and a possible crosstalk between the blue and red light signalling pathways.

Blue light regulates many physiological and developmental processes in fungi. In Trichoderma atroviride the complex formed by the BLR-1 and BLR-2 proteins appears to play an essential role as a sensor and transcriptional regulator in photoconidiation. Here we demonstrate that the BLR proteins are necessary for carbon deprivation induced conidiation, even in the absence of light, pointing to the existence of an unprecedented cross talk between light and carbon sensing. Further, in contrast to what has been found in all other fungal systems, clear BLR-independent blue-light responses, including the activation of protein kinase A (PKA) and the regulation of gene expression, were found. Expression of an antisense version of the pkr-1 gene, encoding the regulatory subunit of PKA, resulted in a nonsporulating phenotype, whereas overexpression of the gene produced colonies that conidiate even in the dark. In addition, overexpression of pkr-1 blocked the induction of early light response genes. Thus, our data demonstrate that PKA plays an important role in the regulation of light responses in Trichoderma. Together, these observations suggest that the BLR complex plays a general role in sensing environmental cues that trigger conidiation and that such a role can be separated from its function as a transcription factor.

Blue light and development regulate the expression of the phr1 gene of the filamentous fungus Trichoderma harzianum. The predicted product of phr1, the DNA repair enzyme photolyase, is likely to help protect Trichoderma, which grows in the soil as a mycoparasite or saprophyte, from damage upon emergence and exposure to ultraviolet‐c. phr1 is transiently expressed in mycelium and conidiophores after illumination. phr1 mRNA also accumulates in conidiophores during development and spore maturation. As no other genes displaying rapid, direct light regulation have been described previously in this organism, we have characterized the fluence and time dependence of phr1 induction, and its relation to sporulation and photoreactivation. Induction is transient following a pulse, and, with slower decay, in continuous light. This implies that the photoreceptor, transducers or response are capable of adaptation. About two‐fold more light is required to induce phr1 than conidiation, but this difference is modest, so both responses could use the same or similar chromophore. Adenosine 3′:5′‐cyclic monophosphate bypasses the requirement for light for sporulation, while atropine prevents sporulation even after photoinduction. Light regulation of phr1, however, is indifferent to both these effectors. Induction of photolyase expression behaves as a direct, rapid response to light, independent of the induction of sporulation. Indeed, illumination of mature spores increases their capacity for photoreactivation. Blue light seems to warn the organism against the harmful effects of short wavelengths, inducing phr1 expression and sporulation by pathways that are, at least in part, distinct.

Blue light and development regulate the expression of the phr1 gene of the filamentous fungus Trichoderma harzianum. The predicted product of phr1, the DNA repair enzyme photolyase, is likely to help protect Trichoderma, which grows in the soil as a mycoparasite or saprophyte, from damage upon emergence and exposure to ultraviolet-c. phr1 is transiently expressed in mycelium and conidiophores after illumination. phr1 mRNA also accumulates in conidiophores during development and spore maturation. As no other genes displaying rapid, direct light regulation have been described previously in this organism, we have characterized the fluence and time dependence of phr1 induction, and its relation to sporulation and photoreactivation. Induction is transient following a pulse, and, with slower decay, in continuous light. This implies that the photoreceptor, transducers or response are capable of adaptation. About two-fold more light is required to induce phr1 than conidiation, but this difference is modest, so both responses could use the same or similar chromophore. Adenosine 3':5'-cyclic monophosphate bypasses the requirement for light for sporulation, while atropine prevents sporulation even after photoinduction. Light regulation of phr1, however, is indifferent to both these effectors. Induction of photolyase expression behaves as a direct, rapid response to light, independent of the induction of sporulation. Indeed, illumination of mature spores increases their capacity for photoreactivation. Blue light seems to warn the organism against the harmful effects of short wave-lengths, inducing phr1 expression and sporulation by pathways that are, at least in part, distinct.

The volume-sensitive chloride current (IClVol) exhibit a time-dependent decay presumably due to channel inactivation. In this work, we studied the effects of Cl- and H+ ions on IClVol decay recorded in HEK-293 and HL-60 cells using the whole-cell patch clamp technique. Under control conditions ([Cl-]e = [Cl-]i = 140 mM and pHi = pHe = 7.3), IClVol in HEK cells shows a large decay at positive voltages but in HL-60 cells IClVol remained constant independently of time. In HEK-293 cells, simultaneously raising the [Cl-]e and [Cl-]i from 25 to 140 mM (with pHe = pHi = 7.3) increased the fraction of inactivated channels (FIC). This effect was reproduced by elevating [Cl-]i while keeping the [Cl-]e constant. Furthermore, a decrease in pHe from 7.3 to 5.5 accelerated current decay and increased FIC when [Cl-] was 140 mM but not 25 mM. In HL-60 cells a slight IClVol decay was seen when the pHe was reduced from 7.3 to 5.5. Our data show that inactivation of IClVol can be controlled by changing either the Cl- or H+ concentration or both. Based on our results and previously published data we have built a model that explains VRAC inactivation. In the model the H+ binding site is located outside the electrical field near the extracellular entry whilst the Cl- binding site is intracellular. The model depicts inactivation as a pore constriction that happens by simultaneous binding of H+ and Cl- ions to the channel followed by a voltage-dependent conformational change that ultimately causes inactivation.