The ICH Score is a valid clinical grading scale for long-term functional outcome after acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Many ICH patients improve after hospital discharge and this improvement may continue even after 6 months post-ICH.

ImportanceSymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) is a serious complication of stroke thrombolytic therapy. Many stroke centers have adopted 0.25-mg/kg tenecteplase instead of alteplase for stroke thrombolysis based on evidence from randomized comparisons to alteplase as well as for its practical advantages. There have been no significant differences in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) reported from randomized clinical trials or published case series for the 0.25-mg/Kg dose.ObjectiveTo assess the risk of sICH following ischemic stroke in patients treated with tenecteplase compared to those treated with alteplase.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis was a retrospective observational study using data from the large multicenter international Comparative Effectiveness of Routine Tenecteplase vs Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke (CERTAIN) collaboration comprising deidentified data on patients with ischemic stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis. Data from more than 100 hospitals in New Zealand, Australia, and the US that used alteplase or tenecteplase for patients treated between July 1, 2018, and June 30, 2021, were included for analysis. Participating centers included a mix of nonthrombectomy- and thrombectomy-capacity comprehensive stroke centers. Standardized data were abstracted and harmonized from local or regional clinical registries. Consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke who were considered eligible and received thrombolysis at the participating stroke registries during the study period were included. All 9238 patients who received thrombolysis were included in this retrospective analysis.Main Outcomes and MeasuressICH was defined as clinical worsening of at least 4 points on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), attributed to parenchymal hematoma, subarachnoid, or intraventricular hemorrhage. Differences between tenecteplase and alteplase in the risk of sICH were assessed using logistic regression, adjusted for age, sex, NIHSS score, and thrombectomy.ResultsOf the 9238 patients included in the analysis, the median (IQR) age was 71 (59-80) years, and 4449 patients (48%) were female. Tenecteplase was administered to 1925 patients. The tenecteplase group was older (median [IQR], 73 [61-81] years vs 70 [58-80] years; P < .001), more likely to be male (1034 of 7313 [54%] vs 3755 of 1925 [51%]; P < .01), had higher NIHSS scores (median [IQR], 9 [5-17] vs 7 [4-14]; P < .001), and more frequently underwent endovascular thrombectomy (38% vs 20%; P < .001). The proportion of patients with sICH was 1.8% for tenecteplase and 3.6% for alteplase (P < .001), with an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 0.42 (95% CI, 0.30-0.58; P < .01). Similar results were observed in both thrombectomy and nonthrombectomy subgroups.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this large study, ischemic stroke treatment with 0.25-mg/kg tenecteplase was associated with lower odds of sICH than treatment with alteplase. The results provide evidence supporting the safety of tenecteplase for stroke thrombolysis in real-world clinical practice.

Introduction: Despite pharmacological and practical advantages for tenecteplase (TNK) over alteplase (ALT), no differences were observed in percent of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) in randomized trials (fewer than 900 total patients for either treatment). We compared rates of sICH in patients treated with either drug, using a large, multicenter, international registry. Methods: The CERTAIN collaboration is an ongoing registry of deidentified patient-level data of thrombolytic treated ischemic stroke from various hospitals/programs in New Zealand, Australia, and the United States that have used ALT or TNK since July 1, 2018. Standardized data were abstracted and harmonized from local or regional clinical registries. We defined sICH as clinical worsening of at least 4 points on NIHSS, attributed to parenchymal hematoma, subarachnoid or intraventricular hemorrhage. We used logistic regression for binary variables, adjusting sICH differences for age, baseline NIHSS, thrombectomy, and source hospital network and Mann-Whitney test for continuous baseline variables. Results: A total of 7891 patients were included in the initial analysis. The TNK group was older, more likely to be male, had higher NIHSS, and more frequently underwent mechanical thrombectomy (Table. Sample Characteristics). The sICH rate was 3.71% for ALT and 2.13% for TNK: adjusted OR (95%CI) = 0.49 (0.31-0.76) p=0.002. For patients not undergoing thrombectomy after thrombolytic, the sICH rate was 3.00% for ALT and 1.74% for TNK, adjusted OR (95%CI) = 0.48 (0.27-0.87), p=0.016. For thrombectomy treated cases, sICH rate was 6.80% for ALT and 2.80% for TNK, adjusted OR (95%CI) 0.60 (0.31-1.16), p=0.129. Conclusion: In this preliminary analysis from a large, multicenter registry, ischemic stroke treated with tenecteplase was associated with a lower rate of sICH than with alteplase. An updated analysis with patient data from additional sites will be presented at the Conference.