In large-scale performance-based assessment of medical professionals' clinical competence, simulated patients (standardized patients-SPs) are used not only to simulate case problems but also to record on check-list the examinees' clinical performance during their encounter with the SPs. The purposes of this study were to determine the SPs' overall accuracy in recording check-list items, and whether their accuracy was affected by the various characteristics of the check-list, and by the different times during a day and the different days within the examination when the recordings were obtained. Results showed that the SPs' accuracy in recording check-list items was good to very good and was affected by the length of the check-list, as well as by the type and the clarity of the check-list item. It was further found that the SPs' accuracy was consistent and did not vary over the course of a one-day or a 15-day examination.

By the end of 1990-91, the Southern Illinois University School of Medicine had had six years of experience with comprehensive, performance-based examinations of senior medical students' levels of clinical competence; this report assesses the psychometric aspects of the six examinations given during that period. The examinations were aimed at determining the students' readiness for postgraduate training. Compared with other clinical performance-based assessments that use standardized patients (SPs), these examinations had two important and unique features: (1) the examinations assessed a comprehensive range of clinical skills and reasoning; and (2) they approximated the challenges of real clinical practice wherein a practitioner's skills need to be orchestrated and prioritized in order to meet the challenges of the case encountered. Each year, the performance-based assessment given was an intensive clinical examination requiring each student to work up 13 to 18 SP problems over a three-day period. To administer an examination to an entire class of students took three weeks. Because all students after the first year of administration (1986) were required to pass these examinations, the fairness of test design and scoring and the setting of performance standards for the examinations became important issues for the faculty. The results, accumulated over six years and based on a total of 6,804 student-patient encounters involving 405 students, indicate that this kind of clinical performance-based examination can discriminate a wide range of students' clinical performances. The results provide evidence for the examinations' test security, content validity, construct validity, and reliability.

Except for the women examinee's higher performance in personal manner, the men and women examinees generally performed equally well with respect to interpersonal and communication skills, and they performed equally well regardless of the gender of the SP.

The use of performance-based examinations consisting of standardized-patient (SP) cases has increased greatly in recent years. These examinations are typically long and thus require the presentation of the same SP cases to several consecutive examinee groups. Consequently, concerns have arisen about the potential for violations of test security whereby students who were tested early in the examination period pass on information to students tested later. These concerns are addressed using data from the SP-based examinations administered to five classes (1986-1990) of senior medical students at Southern Illinois University School of Medicine. Because of the length of the examinations, each class was randomly divided into five groups and the examination was administered to one group at a time, requiring three days of testing time per group and three weeks of testing time per class. The results showed no consistent, systematic changes in case means across the five groups tested at different times throughout the examination period, and thus provide no evidence of serious, widespread violations of test security.

The performance of subjects (Ss) receiving contingent feedback in an eyes‐closed alpha enhancement setting was contrasted with changes in alpha of Ss receiving random feedback and no feedback. In addition, comparisons were made between: 1) binary and continuous feedback signals; 2) integrated and criterion alpha as dependent variables; and 3) eyes‐open and eyes‐closed alpha enhancement tasks. It was found that: 1) Increases in emitted occipital alpha under eyes‐closed conditions are related to contingent reinforcement. 2) Proportional feedback was most efficient in the rapid development of eyes‐closed training. 3) Larger changes in alpha were seen during eyes‐open than during eyes‐closed training. 4) Binary feedback appeared to be more efficient in increasing eyes‐open alpha response. 5) No relationships between the ability to perform the eyes‐open and eyes‐closed alpha enhancement tasks were found within Ss.