Introduction. Hypertension in association with diabetes (DM), renal impairment (RI), and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) increases the risk of future cardiovascular events. We hypothesize, traditional herbal medicines Danshen and Gegen (D&G) have beneficial effects on atherogenesis in these high-risk hypertensive subjects. Subjects and Methods. 90 asymptomatic hypertensive subjects associated with LVH (63.3%), DM (62.2%), or RI (30%) were randomized to receive D&G herbal capsules 1 gm/day, 2 gm/day, or identical placebo capsules in double-blind and parallel fashion for 12 months. Brachial flow-mediated dilation (endothelium-dependent dilation, FMD) and carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) were measured by ultrasound. All data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences in Windows 16.0. Results. Their mean age was 55 ± 8 years, and 74.4% were male. After 12 months of adjunctive therapies and compared with baseline, there were no significant changes in blood pressure, heart rate, hematological, glucose, and creatinine profiles in both placebo and D&G groups. FMD improved significantly during D&G (P = 0.0001) and less so after placebo treatment (P = 0.001). There was a mild but significant decrease in carotid IMT after D&G (P < 0.001) but no significant changes after placebo. A trend of better improvement in FMD after higher versus lower D&G dosages was seen. D&G were well tolerated, with no significant adverse events or blood biochemistry changes. Conclusion. D&G adjunctive treatment was well tolerated and significantly improved atherogenesis in high-risk hypertensive patients, with potential in primary atherosclerosis prevention.
Background and Objective
Drug–drug interactions between direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) and antiseizure medications via the cytochrome P450 (CYP) or the P-glycoprotein (P-gp) systems may lead to under-anticoagulation. The clinical relevance of these interactions is unclear. We aimed to elucidate the risk of thromboembolism with concurrent DOAC and CYP/P-gp modulating antiseizure medications.
Methods
In this propensity score-weighted population-based retrospective cohort study, we used competing risk regression analyses to determine the risks of ischemic stroke, venous thromboembolism, and death in DOAC recipients taking CYP/P-gp-modulating antiseizure medications (phenytoin, valproate, levetiracetam, carbamazepine, or phenobarbital) versus those taking CYP/P-gp-neutral antiseizure medications (pregabalin, gabapentin, or clobazam). We also performed secondary analyses for the epilepsy and atrial fibrillation subgroups.
Results
Among DOAC users, CYP/P-gp-modulating antiseizure medications were collectively associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke (adjusted hazard ratio 1.28, 95% confidence interval 1.05–1.57,
p
= 0.017). In addition, phenytoin (adjusted hazard ratio 1.34, 95% confidence interval 1.07–1.68,
p
= 0.011) and valproate (adjusted hazard ratio 1.38, 95% confidence interval 1.10–1.74,
p
= 0.006) were associated with increased mortality. In the epilepsy subgroup, the risk of ischemic stroke and venous thromboembolism did not differ between CYP/P-gp-modulating and CYP/P-gp-neutral antiseizure medications.
Conclusions
Although CYP/P-gp-modulating antiseizure medications were associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke when paired with DOAC in the primary analysis, such a phenomenon was not found among patients with epilepsy who took phenytoin, valproate, or levetiracetam with DOAC. Therefore, these antiseizure medication options among patients with epilepsy with concurrent DOAC should not be restricted solely based on their potential drug–drug interactions. Yet, the increased mortality during concurrent use of DOAC with phenytoin or valproate might call for caution.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40263-022-00971-9.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.