The relationship between cognitive task demand and effect of bilateral advantage (BLA) was examined. In Experiment 1, the task demand based upon visual stimulus complexity was manipulated. One-digit and two-digit numbers were presented in the left, right or both visual fields tachistoscopically and subjects were requested to identify the numbers. The results showed no BLA, although a right visual field advantage was demonstrated. In Experiment 2, cognitive demand in terms of memory was manipulated. Subjects were asked to recall one-digit numbers that were presented successively once, three and five times in the left, right or the both visual fields. The results did not show any sign of BLA in the recall of numbers. In Experiment 3, a greater memory load task was given than that in Experiment 2, where two-digit numbers were presented successively (once, three and five times). Subjects were asked to recall the numbers. The results showed a significant BLA in the recall of numbers, i.e., the correct numbers in the correct temporal positions. These results strongly suggest that a benefit of redundant bilateral visual fields presentation is shown only in a highly cognitively demanding task, especially when it involves phonological memory loads.

This study examined hemispheric asymmetry for concurrent processing of object and spatial information. Participants viewed two successive stimuli, each of which consisted of two digits and two pictures that were randomly located and judged them as identical or different. A sample stimulus was presented in a central visual field, followed by a matching stimulus presented briefly in a left or right visual field. The matching stimuli were different from the sample stimuli with respect to the object (digit or picture) or spatial (locations or distances of items) aspect. No visual field asymmetry was found in the detection of object change. However, a left visual field advantage was found in the detection of spatial change. This result can be explained by the double filtering by frequency theory of Ivry and Robertson, who asserted that the left hemisphere has a bias for processing information contained in relatively high spatial frequencies whereas the right hemisphere has a bias for processing information contained in relatively low spatial frequencies. Based upon this evidence, the importance of interhemispheric integration for visual scene perception is discussed.

Kosslyn (1987) proposed that categorical spatial relations (i.e., above/below) would be processed more effectively in the left hemisphere, whereas coordinate or metric relations would be processed more effectively in the right hemsphere. To examine his hypothesis, a sequential matching task adopted by Laeng and Peters (1995) was administered. In this task, a sample stimulus was presented in the central visual field and it was followed by a match stimulus presented briefly in the left or right visual field. In Experiment 1, the participants' task was a samedifferent discrimination about spatial relations. Participants responded faster to categorical changes in the right visual field presentation. This result was consistent with Kosslyn's hypothesis. In Experiment 2, participants were asked to make same-different judgements about objects (either a digit or a natural line drawing) irrespective of spatial location. They responded faster to digit (i.e., verbal) changes in the right visual field. This result was compatible with the classical notion that verbal materials would be processed more effectively in the left hemisphere. This evidence suggests that the matching paradigm of the present study is useful for investigating cerebral lateralisation not only for spatial relations but also for object processes.

Relative engagements of the orthographic and semantic codes in Kanji and Hiragana word recognition were investigated. In Exp. 1, subjects judged whether the pairs of Kanji words (prime and target) presented sequentially were physically identical to each other in the word condition. In the sentence condition, subjects decided whether the target word was valid for the prime sentence presented in advance. The results showed that the response times to the target swords orthographically similar (to the prime) were significantly slower than to semantically related target words in the word condition and that this was also the case in the sentence condition. In Exp. 2, subjects judged whether the target word written in Hiragana was physically identical to the prime word in the word condition. In the sentence condition, subjects decided if the target word was valid for the previously presented prime sentence. Analysis indicated that response times to orthographically similar words were slower than to semantically related words in the word condition but not in the sentence condition wherein the response times to the semantically and orthographically similar words were largely the same. Based on these results, differential contributions of orthographic and semantic codes in cognitive processing of Japanese Kanji and Hiragana words was discussed.

No abstract