No abstract

We investigated the clinical outcomes of helical tomotherapy in 23 patients aged ≥80 years with localized and locally advanced prostate cancer and compared the results with data from 171 patients under 80 years. All patients received helical tomotherapy in our hospital between September 2009 and October 2012. The median follow-up periods were 35 months in the aged group and 34 months in the younger group. The median prescribed dose in helical tomotherapy was 78 Gy in 39 fractions (range, 72–78 Gy). The 3-year overall survival and biochemical relapse-free rates were 92% and 96% in the aged group and 99.4% and 97.3% in the younger group, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the biochemical relapse-free rates. The 3-year cumulative incidences of late Grade 2 or higher rectal toxicity and urinary toxicity were 13% and 4.8% in the aged group and 7.0% and 1.2% in the younger group, respectively. There was no significant difference between the aged group and the younger group in the cumulative incidence rates of rectal toxicity or urinary toxicity. No patients exhibited Grade 4 or higher toxicity, and all patients improved with conservative therapy. Helical tomotherapy in super-elderly patients with localized and locally advanced prostate cancer had good biochemical control rates without severe late toxicity. Definitive helical tomotherapy may be the treatment of choice for patients with localized and locally advanced prostate cancer, even in those older than 80 years of age.

Key Clinical MessageThe mechanism of abscopal effect is becoming clear by the progress of cancer immunology. A 54‐year‐old male with recurrent gastric cancer presented an abscopal effect after radiotherapy with concurrent adoptive T‐cell immunotherapy (immunoradiotherapy). Immunoradiotherapy has potential to induce abscopal effect by strengthening systemic antitumor immunity even in recurrent cancer.

BACKGROUND The objective of this study is to determine whether in a dialysis patient with prostate cancer leuprorelin acetate blood levels were abnormally high or low due to kidney failure or because of dialysis. METHODS Sustained‐release leuprorelin acetate 3.75 mg was given every 4 weeks for prostate cancer in a 79‐year‐old dialysis patient. Changes in serum level of leuprorelin acetate in this patient were measured before and after dialysis. RESULTS Leuprorelin acetate appeared to have a dialysance close to that of vitamin B12, which has a similar molecular weight. The amount dialyzed did not exceed 8.3% of the amount released per day. Mean blood levels of leuprorelin acetate, as measured in this patient, were higher (0.64 to 1.31 ng/ml) than those in prostate cancer patients with normal kidney function (mean ± SD, 0.24 ± 0.12 to 0.50 ± 0.32 ng/ml). CONCLUSIONS Sustained‐release leuprorelin acetate can be used safely in dialysis patients with prostate cancer. Prostate 34:191–194, 1998. © 1998 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

No abstract