Purpose To evaluate clinical outcomes and radiographic changes in patellofemoral (PF) joint congruity between open wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) and hybrid closed wedge HTO (HCWHTO). Methods From 2011 to 2013, 36 knees in 31 patients who underwent OWHTO and 21 knees in 17 patients who underwent HCWHTO were evaluated in this retrospective study with a minimum 5-year follow-up. Radiological outcomes including hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), femoral patellar height index (FPHI), preoperative PF osteoarthritis (OA) grade, medial and lateral joint spaces of the PF joint, and congruence angle were measured. Clinical parameters including the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) were also evaluated. Preoperative and final follow-up values for each procedure were compared in outcome analyses. Results Mean preoperative HKA and the degree of PF-OA were significantly more severe for patients treated with HCWHTO compared with those treated with OWHTO (p = 0.001, p = 0.0001). Mean postoperative FPHI was significantly decreased with proximalization of the patella in HCWHTO (p = 0.01) but showed no significant change in OWHTO (n.s.). Regarding PF joint congruity after HCWHTO, lateral joint space and congruence angle were significantly improved (p = 0.0001, p = 0.005), while medial joint space was not significantly changed (n.s.). After OWHTO, congruence angle showed no significant difference (n.s.), but medial and lateral joint spaces were significantly decreased (p = 0.0001, p = 0.018). There were no significant differences in KOOS and OKS between the groups (n.s., n.s.). Conclusions Although degrees of varus knee and PF-OA were more severe in HCWHTO than those in OWHTO, HCWHTO led to improved PF joint congruity, and its mid-term clinical outcomes were equivalent to those of OWHTO. Therefore, in patients with varus knee combined with PF-OA preoperatively, HCWHTO is a more effective treatment than OWHTO. Level of evidenceTherapeutic level III. Keywords Open wedge high tibial osteotomy • Hybrid closed wedge high tibial osteotomy • Patellofemoral joint congruity • Osteoarthritis • Knee * Tetsuro Ishimatsu

No abstract

Background Soft tissue has an important role in stabilizing the hinge point of medial closed wedge distal femoral osteotomy (MCWDFO). However, there are conflicting data on the soft tissue anatomy around the hinge point of MCWDFO and, therefore, further anatomical data are needed. The purposes of the study were to: 1) anatomically analyze the soft tissue around the hinge point of MCWDFO; 2) radiologically define the appropriate hinge point to prevent an unstable hinge fracture based on the result of the anatomical analysis; and 3) histologically analyze the soft tissue based on the result of the anatomical analysis. Methods In 20 cadaveric knees, the capsule attachment of the distal lateral side of the femur was marked with a radiopaque ball bearing. A digital planning tool was used to calculate the area of the marked capsule attachment around the ideal hinge point of MCWDFO on radiographs. The soft tissue around the hinge point was histologically examined and the periosteal thickness was measured and visualized graphically. The graph and radiograph were overlayed using image editing software, and the appropriate hinge position was determined based on the periosteal thickness. Results As a result, the periosteal thickness of the distal lateral femur tended to rapidly decrease from the metaphyseal region toward the diaphyseal region. The overlayed graph and radiograph revealed that the periosteal thickness changed in the region corresponding to the apex of the turning point of the femoral metaphysis in all cases. Conclusions In conclusion, the periosteum might support the hinge of MCWDFO within the area surrounded by the apex of the turning point of the femoral metaphysis and the upper border of the posterior part of the lateral femoral condyle.

Background:Both the lateral center-edge angle and acetabular roof obliquity on anteroposterior radiographs are well-known prognostic predictors of osteoarthritis progression in patients with acetabular dysplasia. However, few studies have evaluated osteoarthritis progression on false-profile radiographs. In the present study, osteoarthritis progression was evaluated on anteroposterior and false-profile radiographs.Methods:We retrospectively evaluated 76 patients with acetabular dysplasia with Tönnis grade-0 or 1 osteoarthritis, from a group of 179 patients (209 hips), who had undergone unilateral periacetabular osteotomy from 1995 to 2005. We evaluated the hip joint of the contralateral, untreated side. All patients were followed for ≥10 years. Of the 76 patients, 52 patients with Tönnis grade-0 or 1 osteoarthritis at the latest follow-up were categorized into the non-progression group and the remaining 24 patients with Tönnis grade-2 or 3 osteoarthritis were categorized into the progression group. We evaluated patient characteristics as well as radiographic parameters, including the preoperative lateral center-edge angle, acetabular roof obliquity, and anterior center-edge angle.Results:The mean duration of follow-up was 12.6 years (range, 10 to 19 years). On univariate analysis, body weight, body mass index, and all radiographic parameters indicating the severity of acetabular dysplasia significantly differed between the 2 groups. On multivariate analysis, both the anterior center-edge angle and acetabular roof obliquity were considered to be significant predictive factors for osteoarthritis progression. On receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the cutoff values for the lateral center-edge angle, acetabular roof obliquity, and anterior center-edge angle were 15.5°, 15.5°, and 12.5°, respectively.Conclusions:In addition to the lateral center-edge angle and acetabular roof obliquity, we showed that the anterior center-edge angle is a possible prognostic predictor of osteoarthritis progression. These findings indicate that radiographic parameters based on the false-profile view are relevant. Additionally, patients with an anterior center-edge angle of ≤12.5° and a lateral center-edge angle of ≤15.5° seem to be at higher risk of osteoarthritis progression over a 10-year period.Level of Evidence:Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.