Using model strains in which we ectopically express the cyanobacterial clock protein KaiC in cells from which the clock genes kaiA, kaiB and/or kaiC are deleted, we found that some features of circadian clocks in eukaryotic organisms are conserved in the clocks of prokaryotic cyanobacteria, but others are not. One unexpected difference is that the circadian autoregulatory feedback loop in cyanobacteria does not require specific clock gene promoters as it does in eukaryotes, because a heterologous promoter can functionally replace the kaiBC promoter. On the other hand, a similarity between eukaryotic clock proteins and the cyanobacterial KaiC protein is that KaiC is phosphorylated in vivo. The other essential clock proteins KaiA and KaiB modulate the status of KaiC phosphorylation; KaiA inhibits KaiC dephosphorylation and KaiB antagonizes this action of KaiA. Based upon an analysis of clock mutants, we conclude that the circadian period in cyanobacteria is determined by the phosphorylation status of KaiC and also by the degradation rate of KaiC. These observations are integrated into a model proposing rhythmic changes in chromosomal status.

To ascertain whether the circadian oscillator in the prokaryotic cyanobacterium Synechococcus PCC 7942 regulates the timing of cell division in rapidly growing cultures, we measured the rate of cell division, DNA content, cell size, and gene expression (monitored by luminescence of the PpsbAJ::luxAIB reporter) in cultures that were continuously diluted to maintain an approximately equal cell density. We found that populations dividing at rates as rapid as once per 10 h manifest circadian gating of cell division, since phases in which cell division slows or stops recur with a circadian periodicity. The data clearly show that Synechococcus cells growing with doubling times that are considerably faster than once per 24 h nonetheless express robust circadian rhythms of cell division and gene expression. Apparently Synechococcus cells are able to simultaneously sustain two timing circuits that express significantly different periods.Circadian rhythms and cell division cycles (CDCs) constitute two important cyclic biological systems. These rhythmic phenomena are usually not independent in unicellular eukaryotic organisms, where the circadian system often controls the timing of the cell division cycle (1-3). The nature of this control appears to be via "gating" of cell division such that the circadian oscillator specifies certain phases in which cell division is "allowed" to occur and other phases in which it is "forbidden," even if the cells have attained sufficient size (1). Thus, the circadian oscillator acts in addition to other "checkpoints" in determining when cells divide.Recently, it has been discovered that prokaryotic cyanobacteria express authentic circadian rhythms of gene expression (4-10). We wondered whether these prokaryotes would exhibit circadian control over the timing of cell division, especially in cases where the doubling times are much shorter than 24 h. In unicellular eukaryotic organisms, the relationship between cell division and circadian expression has come to be encapsulated in the so-called "circadian-infradian rule," which states that circadian rhythms are expressed only in cells that are dividing once per day or more slowly, i.e., in the "infradian" mode; in cells dividing more rapidly than once per day, cellular processes are thought to become uncoupled from circadian oscillator control (1, 11). This rule implies that there is an interdependency between these two timing circuits such that when cell division is more rapid than once per day, the cells are unable to maintain an independent circadian oscillation. It has been suggested therefore that a circadian clock that provides temporal programming is only adaptive to organisms whose generation time is as long or longer than a day (12).There have been a few investigations with Synechococcus species of cyanobacteria indicating circadian rhythms of cell division (4, 13), but these have been limited to strains and/or growth conditions that allowed only relatively slow growth (doubling times slower than once per 24 h). We decided to ...

The environment significantly influences the dynamic expression and assembly of all components encoded in the genome of an organism into functional biological networks. We have constructed a model for this process in Halobacterium salinarum NRC-1 through the data-driven discovery of regulatory and functional interrelationships among approximately 80% of its genes and key abiotic factors in its hypersaline environment. Using relative changes in 72 transcription factors and 9 environmental factors (EFs) this model accurately predicts dynamic transcriptional responses of all these genes in 147 newly collected experiments representing completely novel genetic backgrounds and environments-suggesting a remarkable degree of network completeness. Using this model we have constructed and tested hypotheses critical to this organism's interaction with its changing hypersaline environment. This study supports the claim that the high degree of connectivity within biological and EF networks will enable the construction of similar models for any organism from relatively modest numbers of experiments.

A biochemical oscillator can be reconstituted in vitro with three purified proteins, that displays the salient properties of circadian (daily) rhythms, including self-sustained 24-h periodicity that is temperature compensated. We analyze the biochemical basis of this oscillator by quantifying the time-dependent interactions of the three proteins (KaiA, KaiB, and KaiC) by electron microscopy and native gel electrophoresis to elucidate the timing of the formation of complexes among the Kai proteins. The data are used to derive a dynamic model for the in vitro oscillator that accurately reproduces the rhythms of KaiABC complexes and of KaiC phosphorylation, and is consistent with biophysical observations of individual Kai protein interactions. We use fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) to confirm that monomer exchange among KaiC hexamers occurs. The model demonstrates that the function of this monomer exchange may be to maintain synchrony among the KaiC hexamers in the reaction, thereby sustaining a high-amplitude oscillation. Finally, we apply the first perturbation analyses of an in vitro oscillator by using temperature pulses to reset the phase of the KaiABC oscillator, thereby testing the resetting characteristics of this unique circadian oscillator. This study analyzes a circadian clockwork to an unprecedented level of molecular detail.

The cyanobacterial circadian clock can be reconstituted in vitro by mixing recombinant KaiA, KaiB and KaiC proteins with ATP, producing KaiC phosphorylation and dephosphorylation cycles that have a regular rhythm with a ca. 24-h period and are temperature-compensated. KaiA and KaiB are modulators of KaiC phosphorylation, whereby KaiB antagonizes KaiA's action. Here, we present a complete crystallographic model of the Synechococcus elongatus KaiC hexamer that includes previously unresolved portions of the C-terminal regions, and a negativestain electron microscopy study of S. elongatus and Thermosynechococcus elongatus BP-1 KaiA-KaiC complexes. Site-directed mutagenesis in combination with EM reveals that KaiA binds exclusively to the CII half of the KaiC hexamer. The EM-based model of the KaiA-KaiC complex reveals protein-protein interactions at two sites: the known interaction of the flexible C-terminal KaiC peptide with KaiA, and a second postulated interaction between the apical region of KaiA and the ATP binding cleft on KaiC. This model brings KaiA mutation sites that alter clock period or abolish rhythmicity into contact with KaiC and suggests how KaiA might regulate KaiC phosphorylation.