Abdominal pregnancies are a rare form of ectopic pregnancy, which presents a significant risk of maternal morbidity and mortality. We describe an unusual case of a late diagnosis of an abdominal pregnancy in the second trimester, which due to diagnostic challenges, was not detected on 1st trimester and subsequent antenatal ultrasound scans (USS). The abdominal pregnancy was later diagnosed at the repeat anomaly scan and confirmed with a pelvic MRI. This case of abdominal pregnancy is unique when compared to other reported cases, as the fetus was initially enclosed within the amniotic sac with normal liquor volume. Both transvaginal and transabdominal scans appeared to demonstrate an intrauterine pregnancy. The diagnosis of abdominal pregnancy was only made possible following rupture of the amniotic sac, leading to anhydramnios, which resulted in the repositioning of the fetus to the upper maternal abdomen. This case represents the challenges faced by obstetricians in diagnosing, managing, and counselling a woman when faced with an abdominal pregnancy.

No abstract

Background/Aim: During the COVID-19 pandemic, concerns regarding theoretical risks of surgery contributed to changes in clinical management to prevent contamination. We looked at the effect the pandemic had on the management of ectopic pregnancy. Our review compares published data on pre-COVID to COVID management of ectopic pregnancies and evaluates the differences where Early Pregnancy Unit (EPU) structures exist. Materials and Methods: We performed a systematic review of the published evidence using a keyword strategy. The "Population Intervention Comparison and Outcome" (PICO) criteria were used to select studies. Three independent reviewers agreed on the data extracted after screening of the literature. The total population analysed included 3122 women. A meta-analysis of the included studies was completed using a random or fixed effect model depending on the heterogeneity (I 2 ). Our outcomes were the following: type of management of ectopic pregnancy (EP), incidence of ruptured EP and rate of complications. We compared units with and without EPU infrastructure. Results: We included every study which recruited women diagnosed with ectopic pregnancy and compared the type of management during and prior the COVID-19 peak. Our literature search yielded 34 papers. 12 were included using the PRISMA guidelines. We observed no difference in the type of management (surgical versus non-surgical) [OR=0. 99 (0.63-1.55), p=0.96, I 2 =77%] in the pre-Covid vs. Covid cohorts overall but a reduction of surgical management in EPU structures. There was no difference in the ectopic rupture rate within the EPU branch ), p=0.24, I 2 =37%]. In contrast, in non-EPU (NPEU) structures there was a clear increased risk of ruptured ectopic pregnancy [OR=2. 86 (1.84-4.46), p<0.01 I 2 =13%] and complications [OR=1. 69 (1.23-2.31), p=0.001, I 2 =45%]. Conclusion: The risk of ruptured ectopic and complications was significantly higher in the absence of EPU structures. This worldwide trend was not reflected in the UK, where EPU systems are widespread, suggesting that EPU structures contributed to prompt diagnosis and safe management. In the post-COVID era, healthcare systems have come to realise that pandemics might become the norm and thus the onus is to identify services that have worked seamlessly.The risk of ectopic pregnancy (EP) is reported as 1 to 2% of all pregnancies (1). During the COVID-19 pandemic, in an attempt to prevent overwhelming of healthcare systems and reduce community transmission of the virus, governments advised patients to attend hospital only when absolutely necessary. As a result, some studies reported a significant reduction in presentation to emergency gynaecological services, potentially leading to significant delays in diagnoses (2-7). Despite improvements in the management of EP, it still remains associated with significant morbidity and a maternal mortality rate of 0.2 per 1000 in the UK (8). Current management options include expectant, medical and surgical management. Laparoscopic surgery is increasingly b...

Background: Concerns about virus spread during surgery contributed to changes in the clinical management of ectopic pregnancies (EP) during the COVID19 pandemic. Objective: To compare published data on EP management prior versus during the COVID-19 pandemic and evaluate any difference in the management, rupture rate and complications where Early Pregnancy Unit (EPU) structures exist. Search strategy: We performed a systematic review of the literature using a keyword strategy based on our PICO criteria. Selection criteria: We included studies which recruited women diagnosed with ectopic pregnancy and compared the management during and prior the COVID-19 pandemic peak. Data collection and Analysis: Three independent reviewers screened the literature and extracted the data. Meta-analysis of the data was performed on Revman. Main Results: Our search yielded 34 studies; 12 were included in our meta-analysis (3122 women). We found no difference in the type of management of EP between the pre-Covid and Covid cohorts [2714 women, OR 0.99(0.63-1.55), p=0.96, I2=77%]. We observed a non-statistically significant reduction of surgical management within the EPU branch ([OR 0.47(0.19-1.13), p=0.09, I2=81%]). There was no difference in the ectopic rupture rate in units with EPU [OR= 0.66 (0.33-1.31), p=0.24, I2=37%]. In contrast, in non-EPU (NPEU) the risk of ruptured EP [OR=2.86(1.84-4.46), p<0.01 I2=13%] and complications [OR=1.69(1.23-2.31), p=0.001, I2=45%] were increased. Conclusions: The worldwide trend was not reflected in the UK suggesting that EPU may have contributed to prompt diagnosis and safe management of EP. Funding: No funding was received. Keywords: ectopic pregnancy, COVID 19, meta-analysis, early pregnancy unit

No abstract