The novel carbapenem meropenem, which is stable to dehydropeptadase action, was studied in vitro against 173 nosocomial isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa derived from pus, expectorated sputum, bronchial secretions, urine or blood of infected patients. Susceptibilities to meropenem, imipenem, ceftazidime, cefotaxime, piperacillin, gentamicin, amikacin and ciprofloxacin were determined by the agar dilution technique with an inoculum of 10(4) cfu/spot. The proportion of sensitive isolates with MICs below the breakpoint was highest for meropenem (91% less than or equal to 8 mg/l); the proportion of sensitive isolates for the remaining antibacterials was as follows: ciprofloxacin 87% less than or equal to 2 mg/l; imipenem 85% less than or equal to 8 mg/l; ceftazidime 77.5% less than or equal to 16 mg/l; piperacillin 60% less than or equal to 64 mg/l; amikacin 44% less than or equal to 8 mg/l; gentamicin 34% less than or equal to 4 mg/l and cefotaxime 15% less than or equal to 16 mg/l. Strains moderately resistant to imipenem (MIC 16-32 mg/l) were mostly sensitive to meropenem, but highly resistant strains (MIC 128-256 mg/l) were invariably resistant (MIC greater than 128 mg/l) to the new carbapenem.
The in vitro activity of a new parenteral cephalosporin cefepime (BMY 28142) was compared with that of ceftazidime, cefotaxime, piperacillin, imipenem, gentamicin, amikacin and ciprofloxacin against 173 recent multiresistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates of nosocomial origin using an agar dilution technique with an inoculum of 10(4) CFU per spot. The activity of cefepime was comparable to that of ceftazidime, superior to that of cefotaxime, piperacillin, gentamicin and amikacin, but inferior to that of imipenem and ciprofloxacin. Cross-resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to ceftazidime and cefepime occurred in nearly 50% of the cefepime resistant strains and 61.5% of the ceftazidime resistant strains respectively.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.