The purpose of this study was to address one component of the complex topic "elder abuse". A prospective observational study in the psychogeriatric unit of an acute psychiatric hospital demonstrated that 30% (n=37) of all included patients (n=122) were physically restrained. The highest incidence (48%) was found in elderly patients with severe cognitive impairments (diagnosis of dementia and/or delirium) (n=60). The most commonly used devices of physical restraints were bed rails (100%), belts (trunk 93%, limbs 40%) and chair-tables ("gerichair") (41%). Most restraints occurred at the beginning of hospitalization (83%). Physical restraints were continued for many days and on average of many hours a day. Patients with low cognitive status and serious mobility impairments showed a very high risk of being restrained (p=0.015; OR 32.0 [95% CI:2.0-515.1]). Inability to perform ADL activities increased the frequency of restraint use (p=0.035; OR27.7 [95%CI: 1.3-604.1]). As possible co-factors repetitive disruptive behaviors were found. There was no significant difference between the frequency of falls in restrained or unrestrained patients during the observational period, but fall-related fractures (n=2) only occurred in restrained patients. It is possible that restraints increase the use of benzodiazepines and classical neuroleptics. These results confirm that physical restraints remain a common practice in psychogeriatric care. No evidence-based data support the value of restraints in regard to fall prevention and control of behavioral disturbances in elderly people with serious mental illness. In contrast, these devices can have serious adverse effects and mean one of the most severe interventions in fundamental human rights.

Objective: To investigate the correlation between objective and subjective evaluation of patients with total hip replacement. Design: Prospective preliminary trial comparing the Western Ontario and McMaster University questionnaire (WOMAC) and gait analysis preoperatively and three months postoperatively. Setting: A German academic orthopaedic centre specializing in total hip replacement surgery. Subjects: Seventeen patients (median age 70 years) with hip osteoarthritis. Intervention: All patients had had a primary unilateral total hip replacement. Main measures: WOMAC questionnaire to assess self-perceived health status and gait analysis to determine objective gait parameters. Results: Performance of walking as well as subjective judgement of health status improved following surgery (gait speed P = 0.0222; stride length P = 0.038; stance phase ratio P = 0.0466; WOMAC P < 0.0001). However, the correlation between gait parameters and WOMAC was poor ( r = -0.27 or less). Correlation between changes of walking parameters and WOMAC was bad to good ( r = 0.01 to r = -0.72). Conclusion: The WOMAC questionnaire might not reflect walking performance. The addition of gait analysis is recommended to gain objective information about the quality of gait.

As long as geriatric patients are able to communicate verbally, they are most likely to profit from the structured pain interview in spite of existing cognitive impairment. A MMSE score <10 indicates that the interpretation of the data obtained may be difficult, especially due to a high frequency of missing values.

Newly admitted residents have the highest fracture risk. The pattern of risk is similar across all fractures, suggesting a generic causal pathway. Implementation of effective fracture prevention efforts should be a priority at the time of admission to nursing homes.