Background Prolonged storage of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) may increase morbidity and mortality, and patients having massive transfusion might be especially susceptible. We therefore tested the hypothesis that prolonged storage increases mortality in patients receiving massive transfusion after trauma or nontrauma surgery. Secondarily, we considered the extent to which storage effects differ for trauma and nontrauma surgery. Methods We considered surgical patients given more than 10 units of PRBC within 24 hours and evaluated the relationship between mean PRBC storage duration and in-hospital mortality using multivariable logistic regression. Potential nonlinearities in the relationship were assessed via restricted cubic splines. The secondary hypothesis was evaluated by considering whether there was an interaction between the type of surgery (trauma versus nontrauma) and the effect of storage duration on outcomes. Results 305 patients were given a total of 8,046 units of PRBCs, with duration ranging from 8 to 36 days (mean ± SD: 22 ± 6 days). The odds ratio [95% confidence interval (CI)] for in-hospital mortality corresponding to a one-day in mean PRBC storage duration was 0.99 (0.95, 1.03, P = 0.77). The relationship did not differ for trauma and nontrauma patients (P = 0.75). Results were similar after adjusting for multiple potential confounders. Conclusions Mortality after massive blood transfusion was no worse in patients transfused with PRBC stored for long periods. Trauma and nontrauma patients did not differ in their susceptibility to prolonged PRBC storage.
Scientific data are being generated at an ever-increasing rate. The Biomedical and Healthcare Data Discovery Index Ecosystem (bioCADDIE) is an NIH-funded Data Discovery Index that aims to provide a platform for researchers to locate, retrieve, and share research datasets. The bioCADDIE 2016 Dataset Retrieval Challenge was held to identify the most effective dataset retrieval methods. We aimed to assess the value of Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) term-based query expansion to improve retrieval. Our system, based on the open-source search engine, Elasticsearch, expands queries by identifying synonyms from the MeSH vocabulary and adding these to the original query. The number and relative weighting of MeSH terms is variable. The top 1000 search results for the 15 challenge queries were submitted for evaluation. After the challenge, we performed additional runs to determine the optimal number of MeSH terms and weighting. Our best overall score used five MeSH terms with a 1:5 terms:words weighting ratio, achieving an inferred normalized distributed cumulative gain (infNDCG) of 0.445, which was the third highest score among the 10 research groups who participated in the challenge. Further testing revealed our initial combination of MeSH terms and weighting yielded the best overall performance. Scores varied considerably between queries as well as with different variations of MeSH terms and weights. Query expansion using MeSH terms can enhance search relevance of biomedical datasets. High variability between queries and system variables suggest room for improvement and directions for further research. Database URL: https://biocaddie.org/benchmark-data
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.