The interpersonal-psychological theory of suicidal behavior (T. E. Joiner, 2005) proposes that an individual will not die by suicide unless he or she has both the desire to die by suicide and the ability to do so. Three studies test the theory's hypotheses. In Study 1, the interaction of thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness predicted current suicidal ideation. In Study 2, greater levels of acquired capability were found among individuals with greater numbers of past attempts. Results also indicated that painful and provocative experiences significantly predicted acquired capability scores. In Study 3, the interaction of acquired capability and perceived burdensomeness predicted clinician-rated risk for suicidal behavior. Implications for the etiology, assessment, and treatment of suicidal behavior are discussed.

The Interpersonal Theory of Suicide proposes that suicidal behavior is so frightening that in order for an individual to engage in suicidal behavior, desire for suicide must be accompanied by the capability to do so. The capability for suicide is characterized by both a sense of fearlessness about death and elevated physiological pain tolerance. The primary aim of the current project was to reevaluate and revise the Acquired Capability for Suicide Scale (ACSS) and offer a revision to the scale. Expert review of the scale items resulted in retaining seven items assessing fearlessness about death. The recommendation is made to refer to the revised scale as the ACSS-Fearlessness about Death (ACSS-FAD) to reflect its content more specifically. A model with the 7 retained items provided good fit to the data across three independent samples of young adults. Multiple group analyses examining measurement invariance across men and women found that the latent structure of the scale is comparable across gender. Data are also presented demonstrating convergent and discriminant validity for the scale in young adults and an inpatient psychiatric sample. Findings support the viability of the ACSS-FAD, indicating the scale has a replicable factor structure that generalizes across males and females and is substantively related to the construct of fearlessness about death. Taken together, the present work extends our knowledge of the psychometrics of the ACSS-FAD in particular and the nature of fearlessness about death in general.

No abstract

The Emotional Cascade Model proposes that the emotional and behavioral dysregulation of individuals with borderline personality disorder (BPD) may be fundamentally linked through emotional cascades, vicious cycles of intense rumination and negative affect that may induce aversive emotional states. In order to reduce this aversive emotion, dysregulated behaviors such as nonsuicidal self-injury may then be used as distractions from intense rumination. This study explored emotional cascades in a sample enriched with subjects meeting diagnostic criteria for BPD. The first part of the study explored a structural equation model that examined the mediational effects of emotional cascades on the relationship between BPD symptoms and dysregulated behavior and found evidence for full mediation, even after controlling for symptoms of depression and other Cluster B disorders. The second part of the study examined the effects of a rumination induction conducted with the intention of eliciting emotional cascades in those diagnosed with BPD. The results demonstrated that individuals with BPD experienced greater reactivity and intensity of negative affect, but not of positive affect, following the procedure -even when controlling for current depressive symptoms. Future directions and clinical implications for the Emotional Cascade Model are discussed. Keywordsborderline personality disorder; emotion regulation; rumination; suicide attempts; binge-eating An Exploration of the Emotional Cascade Model in Borderline Personality DisorderBorderline personality disorder (BPD) is a disorder in which affected individuals experience difficulties with affective instability and regulation (Koenigsberg, et al., 2002;Yen, Zlotnick, & Costello, 2002) as well as dysregulated behaviors, such as non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) and binge-eating (Brown, Comtois, & Linehan, 2002;Marino & Zanarini, 2001). Yet, the specific nature of this relationship between emotional and behavioral dysregulation has been somewhat elusive. A recent theoretical model, the Emotional Cascade Model (Selby & Joiner, in press;Selby, Anestis, & Joiner, 2008), suggests that the relationship between emotional and behavioral dysregulation in BPD may be explained by rumination. This is because intense Address correspondence to: Thomas E. Joiner, Jr., Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306-1270, joiner@psy.fsu.edu. Publisher's Disclaimer: The following manuscript is the final accepted manuscript. It has not been subjected to the final copyediting, fact-checking, and proofreading required for formal publication. It is not the definitive, publisher-authenticated version. The American Psychological Association and its Council of Editors disclaim any responsibility or liabilities for errors or omissions of this manuscript version, any version derived from this manuscript by NIH, or other third parties. The published version is available at www.apa.org/pubs/journals/abn. NIH Public AccessAuthor Manuscript J Abnorm Psychol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2...

Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) disorder has been suggested for inclusion into the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.; DSM-5; American Psychiatric Association, in preparation), yet there is concern that NSSI is primarily a function of high borderline personality disorder (BPD) symptoms. The purpose of this study was to examine the characteristics of NSSI disorder and compare it to BPD and other DSM Axis I diagnoses commonly seen in clinical practice to aid in the determination of whether NSSI should be considered a separate, valid diagnostic entity. Chart data were analyzed from the screening, intake, and termination information of 571 treatment-seeking patients in a general practice clinic. Patients were classified into one of three groups: NSSI without BPD, BPD (with and without NSSI) or a comparison condition for those who did not meet criteria for the first 2 groups. Participants in these 3 groups were compared on functioning at intake, psychopathology, and diagnostic co-occurrence. Results indicated important group differences regarding diagnostic co-occurrence rates, patient history of associated features, and impairment at intake. The NSSI group displayed similar levels of functional impairment as the BPD group, including on indices of suicidality. The BPD group reported increased experiences with abuse and fewer men relative to the NSSI group. Most in the NSSI group did not exhibit subthreshold BPD symptoms or personality disorder not otherwise specified. In conclusion, a potential NSSI disorder may be characterized by high levels of depressive symptoms, anxiety, suicidality, and low functioning relative to other Axis I diagnoses.