We used dynamic force spectroscopy (DFS) to explore the energy landscape of interactions between a chelated uranyl compound and a monoclonal antibody raised against the uranyl-dicarboxy-phenanthroline complex. We estimated the potential energy barrier widths and the relevant thermodynamic rate constants along the dissociation coordinate. Using atomic force microscopy, four different experimental setups with or without the uranyl ion in the chelate ligand, we have distinguished specific and nonspecific binding in the binding affinity of the uranyl compound to the antibody. The force loading rates for our system were measured from 15 to 26,400 pN/s. The results showed two regimes in the plot of the most probable unbinding force versus the logarithm of the loading rate, revealing the presence of two (at least) activation barriers. Analyses of DFS suggest parallel multivalent binding present in either regime. We have also built a molecular model for the variable fragment of the antibody and used computational graphics to dock the chelated uranyl ion into the binding pocket. The structural analysis led us to hypothesize that the two regimes originate from two interaction modes: the first one corresponds to an energy barrier with a very narrow width of 0.5 +/- 0.2 A, inferring dissociation of the uranyl ion from its first coordination shell (Asp residue); the second one with a broader energy barrier width (3.9 +/- 0.3 A) infers the entire chelate compound dissociated from the antibody. Our study highlights the sensitivity of DFS experiments to dissect protein-metal compound interactions.
Summary:Eleven proteins (immunoglobulins IgG, IgA, IgM, orosomucoid, o^-antiproteinase, haptoglobin, ceruloplasmin, C-reactive protein, transferrin, prealbumin and a 2 -macroglobulin) in human serum were quantitated by a new microparticle-enhanced nephelometric immunoassay. This is a one step competitive assay, based on the nephelometric measurement of light scattered by clusters of protein-coated microparticles specially synthesized for that use. Statistical evaluation (precision, recovery and method comparison) shows that the determination of serum proteins is reliable and accurate for wide ranges of concentration and that the method is quite adequate for strongly increased concentrations. This microparticle-enhanced nephelometric immunoassay appears to offer an alternative method for routine measurement of a great variety of serum proteins at high and intermediate concentrations, which are usually quantified by radial immunodiffusion or conventional immunonephelometry. On account of its sensitivity, it can also be used for the determination of relatively low concentrations of analytes.
Pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A) was found to be a good first trimester maternal serum marker, together with free beta-human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) subunits, for the biochemical screening of fetal trisomy 21 (Down's syndrome). We have raised monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against PAPP-A purified from human pregnancy serum. The different antibodies were characterized biochemically by Western blot analysis and in terms of specificity (reaction with non-pregnant and male serum). Their performance in Down's syndrome screening was assessed in comparison with an existing enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method after labelling of the different mAbs with biotin or horseradish peroxidase. A pair of mAbs was eventually chosen for a double-antibody sandwich protocol. The selected combination was found to have a significantly increased specificity (P = 0.0116) over the method using (purified) polyclonal antibodies, together with slightly increased sensitivity. In our limited number of Down's syndrome pregnancy samples (n = 17) and controls (n = 18), the medians as well as the multiples of the median values (for the affected cases) were comparable between the two methods described.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.