In this randomized trial, cryoballoon ablation was noninferior to radiofrequency ablation with respect to efficacy for the treatment of patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, and there was no significant difference between the two methods with regard to overall safety. (Funded by Medtronic; FIRE AND ICE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01490814.).

Background-Ventricular fibrillation is the main mechanism of sudden cardiac death. The feasibility of eliminating recurrent episodes by catheter ablation has not been reported. Methods and Results-Twenty-seven patients without known heart disease (13 men, 14 women, 41Ϯ14 years of age) were studied after being resuscitated from recurrent (10Ϯ12) episodes of primary idiopathic ventricular fibrillation; 23 had received a defibrillator. The first initiating beat of ventricular fibrillation had an identical electrocardiographic morphology and coupling interval (297Ϯ41 ms) to preceding isolated premature beats typically noted in the aftermath of resuscitation. These triggers were localized by mapping the earliest electrical activity and ablated by local radiofrequency delivery. Outcome was assessed by Holter and defibrillator memory interrogation. Premature beats were elicited from the Purkinje conducting system in 23 patients: from the left ventricular septum in 10, from the anterior right ventricle in 9, and from both in 4. The interval from the Purkinje potential to the following myocardial activation varied from 10 to 150 ms during premature beat but was 11Ϯ5 ms during sinus rhythm, indicating location at peripheral Purkinje arborization. The premature beats originated from the right ventricular outflow tract muscle in 4 patients. The accuracy of mapping was confirmed by acute elimination of premature beats during local radiofrequency delivery. During a follow-up of 24Ϯ28 months, 24 patients (89%) had no recurrence of ventricular fibrillation without drug. Conclusions-Primary idiopathic ventricular fibrillation is a syndrome characterized by dominant triggers from the distal Purkinje system. These sources can be eliminated by focal energy delivery.

A trial fibrillation (AF) is the most common human arrhythmia and is associated with increased risk for ischemic stroke and cardiovascular mortality. The pulmonary veins (PV) are important trigger sites of paroxysmal AF, 1 and their electric isolation from the left atrium (LA) is associated with a high rate of freedom from AF in patients without comorbidities.2 In persistent AF, however, additional arrhythmogenic atrial sites are responsible for AF maintenance and pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is much less successful with reported 5-year AF freedom rate of 20% after a single and 45% after multiple procedures.3,4 Additional ablation strategies have been developed to improve outcomes including linear lesions and ablation of complex-fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) in the left and right atrium (RA), both as a stand-alone approach 5 or in addition to PV isolation. 6 Albeit improving the rate of AF-free survival in some studies, these ablation strategies are inconsistent because of the variable definition and significance of CFAE and require prolonged radiofrequency delivery times. Moreover, the recent multicenter trial, Substrate and Trigger Ablation for Reduction of Atrial Fibrillation 2 (STAR AF 2), did not reveal significant differences in rate of arrhythmia freedom between PVI only versus PVI+CFAE ablation versus PVI+linear ablation: all the 3 strategies resulted in a 1-year arrhythmia freedom of about 50%. 8,9 Recent clinical and experimental studies have identified more specific electrograms in a discrete point or within a region suggestive of a localized reentry during ongoing AF and have been associated with higher ablation impact on AF. Original ArticleBackground-Complex-fractionated atrial electrograms and atrial fibrosis are associated with maintenance of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). We hypothesized that pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) plus ablation of selective atrial low-voltage sites may be more successful than PVI only. Methods and Results-A total of 85 consecutive patients with persistent AF underwent high-density atrial voltage mapping, PVI, and ablation at low-voltage areas (LVA<0.5 mV in AF) associated with electric activity lasting >70% of AF cycle length on a single electrode (fractionated activity) or multiple electrodes around the circumferential mapping catheter (rotational activity) or discrete rapid local activity (group I). The procedural end point was AF termination. Arrhythmia freedom was compared with a control group (66 patients) undergoing PVI only (group II). PVI alone was performed in 23 of 85 (27%) patients of group I with low amount (<10% of left atrial surface area) of atrial low voltage. Selective atrial ablation in addition to PVI was performed in 62 patients with termination of AF in 45 (73%) after 11±9 minutes radiofrequency delivery. AF-termination sites colocalized within LVA in 80% and at border zones in 20%. Singleprocedural arrhythmia freedom at 13 months median follow-up was achieved in 59 of 85 (69%) patients in group I, which was significantly higher th...

No abstract

Background: Optimal treatment of patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and an indication for internal defibrillator therapy is controversial. Methods: Patients with persistent/longstanding persistent AF and LVEF ≤35% were randomly allocated to catheter ablation of AF or best medical therapy (BMT). The primary study end point was the absolute increase in LVEF from baseline at 1 year. Secondary end points included 6-minute walk test, quality-of-life, and NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide). Pulmonary vein isolation was the primary ablation approach; BMT comprised rate or rhythm control. All patients were discharged after index hospitalization with a cardioverter-defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator implanted. The study was terminated early for futility. Results: Of 140 patients (65±8 years, 126 [90%] men) available for the end point analysis, 68 and 72 patients were assigned to ablation and BMT, respectively. At 1 year, LVEF had increased in ablation patients by 8.8% (95% CI, 5.8%–11.9%) and in BMT patients by 7.3% (4.3%–10.3%; P =0.36). Sinus rhythm was recorded on 12-lead electrocardiograms at 1 year in 61/83 ablation patients (73.5%) and 42/84 BMT patients (50%). Device-recorded AF burden at 1 year was 0% or maximally 5% of the time in 28/39 ablation patients (72%) and 16/36 BMT patients (44%). There was no difference in secondary end point outcome between ablation patients and BMT patients. Conclusions: The AMICA trial (Atrial Fibrillation Management in Congestive Heart Failure With Ablation) did not reveal any benefit of catheter ablation in patients with AF and advanced HF. This was mainly because of the fact that at 1 year, LVEF increased in ablation patients to a similar extent as in BMT patients. The effect of catheter ablation of AF in patients with HF may be affected by the extent of HF at baseline, with a rather limited ablation benefit in patients with seriously advanced HF. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00652522.