The present work compares passive and active rotations in darkness with the aim of characterizing the contribution of efferent and proprioceptive information to the perception of angular displacement. The perception of angular displacements was measured in 12 naive subjects (Ss), who either stood on a rotating platform (passive mode, P) or actively turned about their vertical axis by stepping around "on the spot" on a stationary platform (active mode, A). Rotations consisted of short acceleration epochs followed by constant velocity periods of 18.5, 37, and 55 degrees /s, with angular displacements ranging from 30 degrees to 810 degrees (presented in a randomized order); in the case of active turning, Ss had learned to approximately produce any of these three velocity levels on command. Ss indicated perceived displacement either verbally (verbal estimation mode, E), or by stopping their rotation when self-displacement appeared to match the magnitude specified by the experimenter (targeting, T). The resulting four conditions (PE, PT, AE, AT) were administered blockwise. In none of the four conditions was there a systematic dependence of perception on turning velocity. Therefore, the results were pooled across velocities, and the Ss' performance was summarized in the form of estimation curves showing median estimates as a function of physical displacement. There were several differences between the passive and active modes: AE- and AT-estimation curves were linear, close to veracity, and fairly similar to each other. In contrast, the PE-curve was curved rightwardly ("saturation"), with small displacements being overestimated and large ones underestimated, whereas the PT-curve was linear and indicated a pronounced overestimation of large displacements. Moreover, both the random and the systematic errors (measures of individual consistency and correctness of individual calibration, respectively) were significantly smaller in the active than in the passive modes. The observed independence of Ss' perception from turning velocity also during passive rotation suggests that the perceptual time constant was significantly longer than 16 s (a value cited as typical for vestibular perception), being possibly "enhanced" by contextual implications and by expectations of the Ss. The clear improvement of perceptual performance in the active mode testifies to the importance of the efferent and proprioceptive signals arising during active motion. On the assumption that these signals are about as "noisy" as the vestibular ones, the smaller errors during active turning could result from their combination with the vestibular signal. Alternatively, they could also be intrinsically less noisy than the vestibular signal and simply replace the latter during active motion. In the context of these alternatives (which are not exhaustive), the general problem of sensory fusion is discussed, that is, by which mechanisms are signals from different sensory sources combined to obtain a unified representation of the self's orientation.

Humans who have been stepping for 10 min or more about their vertical axis on a counterrotating platform while fixating on a stationary visual scene continue to circle in the same direction when they attempt, thereafter, to step on firm ground in darkness without turning ("podokinetic after-rotation": PKAR). In the present report, we investigate whether PKAR is due to: (1) a sensory reinterpretation triggered by the conflict between the visual signal of stationarity and the somatosensory message of feet-on-platform rotation, or (2) an adaptation of the somatosensory afferents to prolonged unilateral stimulation irrespective of visual stimulation. Subjects (Ss) circled for 10 min about their vertical axis on an either stationary or counterrotating platform while they were either in darkness, or exposed to an optokinetic stimulus, or to a "head-fixed" stationary pattern. Thereafter, Ss first stood motionless in darkness for 30 s, allowing vestibular after-effects to decay, and then tried (still without vision) to step in place on the stationary platform without turning while their body rotation was recorded by a potentiometer coupled to the head. All conditions involving podomotor activity without concomitant optokinetic stimulation evoked similar PKAR. With optokinetic stimulation, PKAR became larger, apparently because it was summed with an optokinetically induced after-rotation (oPKAR). This oPKAR could be demonstrated in isolation when Ss were passively rotated in front of the OKN-pattern instead of actively circling. PKAR could not be "dumped"; it reappeared after 30 s of straight stepping under visual control. We suggest that PKAR is caused by adaptation of the somatosensory channel and not by a sensory conflict.

We investigated whether posture - either seated (S) or upright standing (O, orthostatic) - affects the vestibular perceptions of angular velocity (V) and displacement (D) in the horizontal plane. We also examined whether the two perceptions are equivalent, that is, whether perceived displacement can be viewed as the time integral of perceived velocity. Sinusoidal stimuli were delivered to subjects sitting on a Barany chair or standing on a turning platform. Frequencies ranged from 0.028 Hz to 0.45 Hz, peak-to-peak amplitudes from 11.3 degrees to 180 degrees, and peak velocities from 4 degrees/s to 64 degrees/s. Perceptions were measured by retrospective magnitude estimation in relation to a standard stimulus (STD) of 0.11 Hz, 45 degrees, 16 degrees/s. For D-estimates, two different moduli were assigned to the STD: Either "45 degrees" (allowing subjects to use the familiar degree scale, which can easily be related to the body scheme) or "10" (which bears no relation to an accustomed scale). For V-estimations the modulus was always "10" (there is no "natural" velocity scale). D-estimates exhibited only a marginal, non-significant dependence on posture (S larger than O); they were highly veridical (linear function of stimulus amplitude, gain close to 1) when subjects used the degree scale but had a reduced gain (approximately 0.76) with a modulus of 10. V-estimates, on the other hand, varied with posture (S significantly larger than O), particularly upon presentation of large stimuli; also, they deviated increasingly from veracity as stimulus magnitude increased (saturating function). Finally, posture had no effect upon the vestibular detection threshold. The frequency response of D-estimates, tested with stimuli of constant amplitude and varying frequency, was bimodal at low frequencies: stimuli were either not detected at all or were veridically estimated, on average (with a large scatter, though). The frequency response of V-estimates, tested with stimuli of constant peak velocity, exhibited a continuous increase with stimulation frequency. We conclude that published quantifications of vestibular self-motion perception, collected mostly with sitting subjects, are likely to be applicable also to the more natural situation of standing subjects provided they are based on displacement indications; in contrast, velocity indications appear to be modulated by posture. The different susceptibility of displacement and velocity estimates to posture and their incongruent frequency characteristics suggest that perceived displacement does not, or does not always, equal the time integral of perceived velocity. The persistence of nearly veridical displacement estimates at low frequencies suggests the intervention of cognitive processes.