The use and control of fire are uniquely human traits thought to have come about fairly late in the evolution of our lineage, and they are hypothesized to correlate with an increase in intellectual complexity. Given the relatively sophisticated cognitive abilities yet small brain size of living apes compared to humans and even early hominins, observations of wild chimpanzees' reactions to naturally occurring fire can help inform hypotheses about the likely responses of early hominins to fire. We use data on the behavior of savanna chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) at Fongoli, Senegal during two encounters with wildfires to illuminate the similarities between great apes and humans regarding their reaction to fire. Chimpanzees' close relatedness to our lineage makes them phylogenetically relevant to the study of hominid evolution, and the open, hot and dry environment at Fongoli, similar to the savanna mosaic thought to characterize much of hominid evolution, makes these apes ecologically important as a living primate model as well. Chimpanzees at Fongoli calmly monitor wildfires and change their behavior in anticipation of the fire's movement. The ability to conceptualize the "behavior" of fire may be a synapomorphic trait characterizing the human-chimpanzee clade. If the cognitive underpinnings of fire conceptualization are a primitive hominid trait, hypotheses concerning the origins of the control and use of fire may need revision. We argue that our findings exemplify the importance of using living chimpanzees as models for better understanding human evolution despite recently published suggestions to the contrary.

No abstract

No abstract

The hypothesis that dangerous snakes served as evolutionary selective pressures on traits characterizing the Order Primates (Snake Detection Hypothesis, SDH), specifically vision and aspects of the brain, has received recent attention. We provide data on 52 encounters between chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) in a savanna landscape and snakes and other large reptiles at the Fongoli site in Senegal, over the course of eight years. These encounters yielded data on 178 interactions between identified individual chimpanzees and reptiles. The majority of encounters with identified reptiles (62%) involved potentially deadly snakes. Constrictors of the family Pythonidae were encountered more frequently than any other reptile. Chimpanzees exhibited a variety of reactions to reptiles, ranging from attacking with objects to ignoring them. Even reptiles other than snakes were met with some degree of alarm when they were in water or moving quickly. We assessed variables that may affect apes’ reactions, as well as the age-sex class of chimpanzees. As a test of Isbell’s snake detection hypothesis, we examined chimpanzees’ reaction intensity to venomous versus constricting snakes but found no difference. We did find significant age-sex differences in chimpanzees’ reactions to snakes, with adolescent males exhibiting higher-intensity reactions than adult males and females and adolescent female chimpanzees. Chimpanzees reacted at significantly higher intensities when snakes were arboreal in location, but reptile species, size, and activity did not significantly influence individuals’ reactions to snakes. We also report one inferred encounter between an adult female chimpanzee and a venomous snake, which led to her death. Our data suggest that snakes are significant threats to chimpanzees in savanna environments and support the hypothesis that danger from snakes could have exerted significant evolutionary pressure on the Order Primates.

No abstract