Under£401 and£404 of the Clean Water Act, permission to degrade existing natural wetlands in the USA may be conditional on restoring or creating "replacement" wetlands. Success of wetland mitigation efforts in adequately replacing lost wildlife habitats depends on our understanding of factors that affect the structure wetland faunal communities. We examined the effects of the presence of predatory fish, shallow vegetated littoral zone, emergent vegetation cover, and wetland age and size on amphibian diversity in 42 replacement wetlands located in the Ohio's Eastern Corn Belt Plains ecoregion. We recorded 13 species of pond-breeding amphibians, and the average local species richness (a-richness) was 4.2 ± 1.7 species per site (range 1-7). There is strong evidence for the positive association between amphibian species richness and presence of a shallow littoral zone, and the negative association with presence of predatory fish. There was no evidence for the association between species richness and age, size, nor the amount of emergent vegetation cover at the study sites. It is estimated that local species richness in wetlands with shallows was 1.76 species higher on average than in wetlands without shallows (95% CI from 0.75 to 2.76). The presence of predatory fish was associated with an average reduction in species richness by an estimated 1.21 species (95% CI from 0.29 to 2.11). Amphibian species associated with forested wetlands were either rare (eastern newt, spotted salamander) or not present at all (marbled salamander, wood frog) in replacement wetlands. We surveyed all replacement wetlands constructed under£401 in Ohio during the past decade, and found that predatory fish were present in 52.4% of the sites and that shallows were absent from 42.7% of the sites. Our results indicate that current wetland replacement practices could have a negative effect on the amphibian diversity within our region.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.