Objective: The COVID-19 pandemic has presented unique challenges to pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) departments. The purpose of this study was to identify these challenges and ascertain how centers overcame barriers in creating solutions to continue to provide high-quality care and keep their workforce safe during the early pandemic. Methods: This is a qualitative study based on semi-structured interviews with physicians in leadership positions who have disaster or emergency management experience. Participants were identified through purposive sampling. Interviews were recorded and transcribed electronically. Themes and codes were extracted from the transcripts by two independent coders. Constant comparison analysis was performed until thematic saturation was achieved. Member-checking was completed to ensure trustworthiness. Results: 14 PEM-trained physicians participated in this study. Communication, leadership and planning, clinical practice, and personal adaptations were the principal themes identified. Recommendations elicited include: improving communication strategies; increasing emergency department (ED) representation within hospital-wide incident command; preparing for a surge and accepting adult patients; personal protective equipment supply and usage; developing testing strategies; and adaptations individuals made to their practice to keep themselves and their families safe. Conclusions: By sharing COVID-19 experiences and offering solutions to commonly encountered problems, pediatric emergency departments may be better prepared for future pandemics.

Background/Purpose: Thromboelastography's (TEG's) use in pediatric trauma patients is not widely studied. Identifying clotting cascade defects can direct decision making regarding blood product transfusion. Methods:We performed a single-center retrospective review of all level 1 pediatric trauma patients. Data collected included demographics, diagnoses, Injury Severity Score, intensive care unit length of stay (ICU LOS), mortality, TEG values, and blood products received. We identified TEG values associated with mortality, ICU LOS, and need for blood product transfusion.Results: A total of 237 trauma 1 patients were identified. After exclusions, 148 patients were included for analysis. Most patients were below TEG transfusion cut points. Patients with elevated reaction time, K value, and fibrinolysis at 30 minutes had increased odds of mortality with odds ratios of 1.71 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22-2.40), 1.94 (95% CI, 1.23-3.05), and 1.15 (95% CI, 1.03-1.28), respectively. For ICU LOS, elevated reaction time, K value, and fibrinolysis at 30 minutes, α angle, and maximum amplitude demonstrated hazard ratios of 0.76 (95% CI, 0.65-0.88), 0.82 (95% CI, 0.64-1.0), 0.95 (95% CI, 0.88-0.99), 1.05 (95% CI, 1.02-1.08), and 1.04 (95% CI, 1.01-1.06), respectively. There was no association between TEG and blood product transfusion.Conclusions: Coagulopathic patients based on TEG had higher mortality. All TEG values, as they moved toward transfusion-trigger cut points, were associated with increased mortality.