PURPOSE.A relationship has been reported between the presence of peripheral neuropathy and the density and shape of corneal nerve fibers. Peripheral neuropathy is a debilitating condition that arises from many common health problems, and its presence is often confirmed with an invasive clinical test called intramuscular electromyography (EMG). In this study, the possibility of developing an alternative or adjunct test to EMG based on the appearance of nerve fibers in corneal micrographs was explored. Since corneal imaging is virtually noninvasive compared with EMG, such a test may be administered more liberally and frequently, before neuropathy symptoms occur. METHODS. A software program that automatically traces nerve fibers in corneal micrographs and generates measures based on these traces was implemented. This software was applied to a database of images collected by confocal laser scanning corneal microscopy from diabetic subjects whose levels of neuropathy were measured with EMG and from healthy subjects. RESULTS. Trends in the nerve fiber density and various measures of shape were calculated and observed, to explore the possibility of using these measures as a clinical tool for corroborating symptoms, confirming an evaluation, or evaluating risk factors for developing neuropathy. CONCLUSIONS. Preliminary statistical trends show a potential for measuring and observing neuropathy severity or for providing an objective risk measure for a patient's ensuing condition. More work is needed in the development of the measures and in their testing to prove that the measures can be made repeatable in a clinical environment. (Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.
Study design:
A retrospective review of 40,919 cervical spine surgeries monitored with motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from a multi-institutional intraoperative neuromonitoring database.
Objective:
The objective of this study was to determine the clinical impact of interventions prompted by C5 spinal nerve root MEP alerts.
Summary of Background Data:
MEPs have been shown to diagnose acute C5 palsies, but additional data are needed regarding the clinical impact of interventions in response to C5 MEP alerts.
Materials and Methods:
Procedures with isolated C5 MEP alerts were categorized as fully resolved, partially resolved, or unresolved based on the status of signals at closure. Clinical outcomes were based on neurological assessment in the immediate postoperative period. The sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and odds ratios (ORs) of C5 MEP alerts for acute C5 palsies were calculated.
Results:
The odds of an acute C5 palsy greatly increased if there was a C5 MEP alert [OR=340.9; 95% confidence (CI): 173.0, 671.6; P<0.0001], and increased further if the alert persisted through closure (OR=820.8; 95% CI: 398.1, 1692.0; P<0.0001). Relative to procedures with unresolved C5 MEP alerts, the risk of an acute C5 palsy significantly decreased if a C5 MEP alert was fully resolved by closure (OR=0.07; 95% CI: 0.02, 0.25; P<0.0001). For alerts resolved during positioning or exposure, 90.9% were resolved with the release of positional traction, and for resolved alerts that occurred after exposure, 36.3% involved just traction release, 14.1% involved both traction release and surgical action, and 30.3% involved just surgical action. The sensitivity of C5 MEP alerts for acute C5 palsies was anesthetic dependent: 89.7% (26/29) in the total intravenous regimen cohort but just 50.0% (10/20) in the inhalational anesthesia cohort.
Conclusions:
The timely release of positional traction is an effective intervention for resolving C5 MEP alerts and reducing the odds of an acute postoperative C5 palsy. Surgical maneuvers, such as the release of distraction or graft adjustment, should be attempted in conjunction with traction release depending on the surgical context of the alert.
Level of Evidence:
Level IV.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.