Chemical detection is key to various behaviours in both marine and terrestrial animals. Marine species, though highly diverse, have been underrepresented so far in studies on chemosensory systems, and our knowledge mostly concerns the detection of airborne cues. A broader comparative approach is therefore desirable. Marine annelid worms with their rich behavioural repertoire represent attractive models for chemosensation. Here, we study the marine worm Platynereis dumerilii to provide the first comprehensive investigation of head chemosensory organ physiology in an annelid. By combining microfluidics and calcium imaging, we record neuronal activity in the entire head of early juveniles upon chemical stimulation. We find that Platynereis uses four types of organs to detect stimuli such as alcohols, esters, amino acids and sugars. Antennae are the main chemosensory organs, compared to the more differentially responding nuchal organs or palps. We report chemically evoked activity in possible downstream brain regions including the mushroom bodies (MBs), which are anatomically and molecularly similar to insect MBs. We conclude that chemosensation is a major sensory modality for marine annelids and propose early Platynereis juveniles as a model to study annelid chemosensory systems.

SummaryWhile humans exposed to a sequential stimulus pairing A-B are commonly assumed to form a bidirectional mental relation between A and B, evidence that non-human animals can do so is limited. Careful examination of the animal literature suggests possible improvements in the test procedures used to probe such effects, notably measuring transfer effects on the learning of B-A pairings, rather than direct recall of A upon cuing with B. We developed such an experimental design and tested 20 Guinea baboons (Papio papio). Two pairings of visual shapes were trained (A1-B1, A2-B2) and testing was conducted in a reversed order, either with conserved pairings (B1-A1, B2-A2) or broken ones (B1-A2, B2-A1). We found baboons’ immediate test performance to be above chance level for conserved pairings and below chance level for broken ones. Moreover, baboons needed less trials to learn conserved pairings compared to broken ones. These effects were apparent for both pairings on average, and separately for the best learned pairing. Baboons’ responding on B-A trials was thus influenced by their previous A-B training. Performance level at the onset of testing, however, suggests that baboons did not respond in full accordance with the hypothesis of bidirectionality. To account for these data, we suggest that two competing types of relations were concomitantly encoded: a directional relation between A and B, which retains the sequential order experienced, and a non-directional relation, which retains only the co-occurrence of events, not their temporal order.

Chemical detection is key to various behaviours in both marine and terrestrial animals. Marine species, though highly diverse, have been underrepresented so far in studies on chemosensory systems, and our knowledge mostly concerns the detection of airborne cues. A broader comparative approach is therefore desirable. Marine annelid worms with their rich behavioural repertoire represent attractive models for chemosensory studies. Here, we study the marine worm Platynereis dumerilii to provide the first comprehensive study of head chemosensory organ physiology in an annelid. By combining microfluidics and calcium imaging, we record neuronal activity in the entire head of early juveniles upon chemical stimulation. We find that Platynereis uses four types of organs to detect stimuli such as alcohols, esters, amino acids and sugars. Antennae, but not nuchal organs or palps as generally hypothesised in annelids, are the main chemosensory organs. We report chemically-evoked activity in possible downstream brain regions including the mushroom bodies, which are anatomically and molecularly similar to insect mushroom bodies. We conclude that chemosensation is a major sensory modality for marine annelids, and propose early Platynereis juveniles as a model to study annelid chemosensory systems.Chemical signals are central to animal behaviour, including feeding, predation, courtship and mating, aggregation, defence, habitat selection, communication [1]. Adapting to variable habitats and changing chemical landscapes, animals have evolved a broad variety of chemosensory organs. Investigations of chemosensory systems in mammals, insects and nematodes have provided insights into the molecular and cellular basis of how chemical information is encoded into neuronal activity [2][3][4]. While similar circuit architectures can be found in distant species at some steps of information processing, this appears to be no general rule [5,6]. Genomic studies have revealed that receptor proteins are highly diverse in the animal kingdom [7], and can be entirely different between distant species -vertebrates and insects for example use distinct types of receptors [8,9]. Hence, a broader comparative approach will facilitate the elucidation of both general operating principles and evolutionary origins of animal chemosensation. Despite studies in fish and crustaceans [10,11], and to a lesser extent in molluscs [12,13], our current understanding of animal chemosensation still mainly concerns terrestrial and airborne cues. Marine animals thus deserve more attention.Marine annelids, traditionally referred to as 'polychaetes', represent an attractive group for chemosensory studies. These worms, represented by more than 10.000 species, are typically freeliving, burrow in the marine sediment, or build tubes. They are known to respond to chemical signals in reproduction, feeding, aggression, avoidance, aggregation, environment probing, larval settlement and metamorphosis [14]. Marine annelids are suited for electrophysiological [15][16][17][18] as well as...

No abstract