AimsTo collect information on the use of the Reveal implantable loop recorder (ILR) in the patient care pathway and to investigate its effectiveness in the diagnosis of unexplained recurrent syncope in everyday clinical practice.Methods and resultsProspective, multicentre, observational study conducted in 2006–2009 in 10 European countries and Israel. Eligible patients had recurrent unexplained syncope or pre-syncope. Subjects received a Reveal Plus, DX or XT. Follow up was until the first recurrence of a syncopal event leading to a diagnosis or for ≥1 year. In the course of the study, patients were evaluated by an average of three different specialists for management of their syncope and underwent a median of 13 tests (range 9–20). Significant physical trauma had been experienced in association with a syncopal episode by 36% of patients. Average follow-up time after ILR implant was 10 ± 6 months. Follow-up visit data were available for 570 subjects. The percentages of patients with recurrence of syncope were 19, 26, and 36% after 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Of 218 events within the study, ILR-guided diagnosis was obtained in 170 cases (78%), of which 128 (75%) were cardiac.ConclusionA large number of diagnostic tests were undertaken in patients with unexplained syncope without providing conclusive data. In contrast, the ILR revealed or contributed to establishing the mechanism of syncope in the vast majority of patients. The findings support the recommendation in current guidelines that an ILR should be implanted early rather than late in the evaluation of unexplained syncope.

Twiddler's syndrome is a well-known complication of pacemaker treatment. It was first described by Bayliss et al. when a patient manipulated and rotated the pulse generator in the pocket so many turns that it resulted in lead dislodgment, diaphragmatic stimulation and loss of capture. In this case report we present a patient who managed to rotate her dual chamber pulse generator so quickly after implantation that exit block occurred within 17 h. She had wound the two leads as far as their tips in a perfect formation around the pulse generator.

In sinus node disease, atrial pacing can be successfully applied during long-term follow-up. Patients with complete bundle branch or bifascicular block in addition to sinus node disease should initially receive a dual-chamber pacemaker, but routine application of dual-chamber stimulation does not appear to be warranted.

Data are reviewed from 88 patients who received double, passive-fixation unipolar endocardial leads for DDD pacemaker treatment. Identical electrodes were used in the right atrium and the right ventricle. Intra-atrial P wave amplitudes, intraventricular QRS complex amplitudes, and atrial and ventricular pacing thresholds were determined at implantation. The intra-atrial P wave amplitudes were not significantly correlated to the intraventricular QRS complex amplitudes. No significant correlation was found between the atrial stimulation thresholds and the ventricular pacing thresholds. The intra-atrial P wave amplitude showed a significant inverse and logarithmic correlation with patient age (P = 0.007). Furthermore, patients with sinus node disease had significantly lower intra-atrial P wave amplitudes (P = 0.04) than patients without this abnormality. The acute atrial and ventricular pacing thresholds and the intraventricular QRS complex amplitude were not correlated to patient age or presence of sinus node disease. Patients requiring higher atrial amplifier sensitivity settings during follow-up were significantly older (P less than 0.05) than those in whom lower atrial sensitivities were sufficient. A postoperative attenuation of the atrial electrogram was detectable by sensitivity programming procedures in 29 of the patients (35%). This phenomenon did not significantly relate to patient age or presence of sinus node disease. No case of permanent atrial undersensing occurred. It is suggested that the lower intra-atrial P wave amplitudes in older patients and patients with sinus node disease reflect degenerative changes in the atrial myocardium. The statistical relations found appear to motivate special attention to atrial sensing in these patient groups.

To study the prevalence and significance of far-field QRS complex sensing via unipolar atrial electrodes, we attempted to provoke this phenomenon postoperatively in 119 patients with DDD pacemakers. It occurred in 42 patients (35%), with different types of atrial electrodes. In 27 cases with documented far-field QRS complex sensing, selection of an adequate atrial amplifier sensitivity eliminated the problem; in the remaining 15 cases, other program adjustments were necessary. In all patients DDD pacing could be maintained, and no reoperations were required. In a retrospective analysis of a subgroup of 26 patients, all having received endocardial unipolar carbon tip electrodes in the right atrial appendage, the possibility of predicting subsequent far-field QRS complex sensing was studied. The occurrence thereof was not significantly related to patient age or sex, indication for pacing, or routinely obtained electrophysiological measurements. Potential far-field QRS complex sensing via the atrial electrode is significantly common in patients with DDD pacemakers. Patient characteristics and intraoperatively measured intraatrial signal amplitudes are not useful in predicting the postoperative occurrence of the phenomenon. As a rule, it can be handled effectively by pulse generator reprogramming.