No abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the growth performance responses and liver trace mineral status of newly weaned steer calves offered a low-moisture, molasses-based block “stress tub” containing organic sources of trace minerals and a Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation culture during the first 21-d of a 42-d feedlot receiving phase. Newly weaned, single source Charolais x Angus steer calves (n = 46; body weight [BW] = 240; SEM = 1.0 kg) were used in a 42-d randomized complete block design feedlot receiving experiment. On d -1 all steers were individually weighed in the morning for allotment purposes, and steers were then stratified by initial BW and allotted to one of ten pens (n = 4 to 5 steers per pen; 5 pens per treatment) that were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatments: 1) no cooked molasses “stress” tub (Con) or 2) ad libitum access to a cooked molasses “stress” tub (Stress Tub; Purina Animal Nutrition, St. Louis, MO, USA) for the first 21-d (Tub). Steers were allotted to their study pens within 36 h of weaning, and the “stress” tub was introduced approximately 24 h post arrival. During the initial 14-d on feed, intake was managed by feed calls to accommodate adaptation to the receiving diet. Following the adaptation period, bunks were managed using a slick bunk management approach. Tub disappearance was monitored daily. Liver biopsies (n = 2 steers/pen) were collected on d 7, 21, and 42 for the determination of Co, Cu, Mn, and Zn. From d 0 to 21 and d 0 to 42, steers from the Tub treatment consumed greater (p ≤ 0.01) amounts of Co, Cu, Mn, and Zn compared with those in the Con treatment. A treatment × day interaction for hepatic concentrations of Co (p = 0.09), Cu (p = 0.01), and Zn (p = 0.01) were noted. On d 7, steers from Tub had greater (p ≤ 0.01) hepatic Co, Cu, and Zn concentrations compared with Con. On d 21, steers from Tub had greater (p ≤ 0.01) hepatic concentrations of Co and Cu; hepatic Zn was similar between treatments (p = 0.83). On study d 42 steers from Tub had greater (p = 0.01) hepatic Cu; however, hepatic concentrations for Co or Zn did not differ (p ≥ 0.34). During the initial 21 d of the experiment, gain efficiency was enhanced (p = 0.03) by 25.0% in steers from Tub compared with Con. Cumulative ADG, DMI, dietary NE utilization and G:F did not differ (p ≥ 0.14) between treatments. It is concluded that the use of stress tubs does not influence the overall growth performance or NE value of the diet during a 42-d receiving period. Stress tub consumption increased hepatic mineral stores during the initial 21-d period and enhanced the Cu status of calves throughout the 42-d period.

The objective of this experiment was to determine the influence that similar dietary roughage equivalency offered in a single or two-diet system during a 210-d growing-finishing period has on growth performance, the efficiency of dietary net energy (NE) utilization, and carcass traits in beef steers. Beef steers (n = 46; initial shrunk [4%]; body weight [BW] = 281 ± 40.4 kg) were fed once daily, and bunks were managed according to a slick bunk management system across all 10 pens. Treatments included the following: 1) A single diet program that was formulated to provide 16% (dry matter [DM] basis) dietary roughage equivalency; SD) or 2) multiple diet programs (formulated to provide a dietary roughage equivalency (DM basis) of 25% for 98 d, 16% for 14 d, and 7% for 98 d; MD). Day 1 to 112 was considered the growing period, and day 113 to 210 (the day of harvest) was considered the finishing period, all steers were implanted on day 1 with a 100 mg trenbolone acetate (TBA) and 14 mg estradiol benzoate (EB) implant and implanted with a 200 mg TBA and 28 mg EB implant on day 112. Average daily gain tended (P = 0.06) to be 9.5% greater for SD compared to MD during the growing portion, and average daily gain (ADG) was greater by 11.3% (P = 0.01) for MD compared to SD during the finishing phase of the experiment. Cumulative ADG did not differ (P ≥ 0.86) between treatments (1.61 vs. 1.62 ± 0.046 kg) for SD and MD, respectively. Cumulative dietary NEm and NEg calculated based on performance did not differ (P ≥ 0.96) between treatments. There were no differences (P ≥ 0.18) detected between treatments for hot carcass weight, dressing percent, longissimus muscle area, rib fat, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) marbling score, kidney, pelvic, heart fat, yield grade, retail yield, empty body fat, or body weight at 28% estimated empty body fat. These data indicate that feedlot producers can feed a single growing-finishing diet to beef steers with minimal effects on overall growth performance or carcass traits.

Two experiments were conducted to investigate the effects of feeding kernel processed corn silage to growing calves at 65% inclusion (dry matter [DM] basis; Exp. 1] and finishing beef steers at 20% inclusion (DM basis; Exp. 2). In Exp. 1, steers (n = 184; initial shrunk body weight [BW] = 388 ± 22.3 kg) were used to evaluate the influence that kernel processing of corn silage has on production responses when fed at 65% diet inclusion (DM basis) during a 46-d growing period. Steers were allotted to 1 of 24 pens (12 replicate pens/treatment). Treatments were based upon corn silage that was either kernel processed or not. In Exp. 2, steers (n = 192; initial shrunk BW = 446 ± 28.3 kg) were used in a 112-d finishing experiment. Treatments were grouped in a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement (24 pens total; 8 steers/pen) to evaluate corn silage harvest maturity (1/2 to 2/3 milk line or black layer) and kernel processing (processed or not) at time of corn silage harvest on finishing steer growth performance and carcass traits when corn silage is fed at a dietary DM inclusion of 20%. Both experiments were analyzed as a randomized completed block design with pen as experimental unit. In Exp. 1, final BW tended (P = 0.07) to be increased by 3 kg in kernel processed corn silage. Daily weight gain and DM intake were increased (P ≤ 0.04) by 6% and 2%, respectively, in steers fed kernel processed corn silage compared to controls; however, gain efficiency was not appreciably influenced by treatment (P = 0.15). In Exp. 2, there were no harvest maturity × kernel processing interactions (P ≥ 0.26) for any growth performance measures or any parameters related to efficiency of dietary NE utilization. No harvest maturity × kernel processing interactions (P ≥ 0.08) were observed for any carcass traits except for the distribution of USDA Prime carcasses (P = 0.04). Steers fed 2/3 milk line and unprocessed corn silage had a lower (P = 0.05) proportion of carcasses grade USDA Prime (0.0%) compared to all other treatments (12.0%). Harvest time (P ≥ 0.07) and kernel processing (P ≥ 0.07) of corn silage had no appreciable influence on any other carcass trait measures. These data indicate that kernel processed corn silage fed to growing calves at 65% diet inclusion (DM basis) enhances intake and daily gain, while kernel processed corn silage fed to finishing steers at 20% diet inclusion (DM basis) does not appreciably influence daily gain, efficiency of gain, or carcass parameters.

In spelling research, data is easily quantifiable and offers a possible glimpse into the mind’s cognitive mechanisms. Previous research has focused on two cognitive routes assumed to be used for spelling in differing situations: one route enabling spelling of words from our lexical memory, and another route facilitating sublexically constructed spellings based on a writer’s rules for how phonemes map to graphemes. As the dual-route model emerged from first language alphabetic spelling data, there is a lack of research which synthesizes second language research with first language spelling models. This paper’s analysis of second language spellings suggests that the traditional dual-route model of spelling may not be universally applicable to second language spellers. Instead, the data suggests that consideration of the differences between L1 and L2 writing systems may help identify directions towards developing a comprehensive model of second language spelling.