13C NMR spectroscopy has been shown to be an important tool in the characterization of coal
structure. Important quantitative information about the carbon skeletal structure is obtained
through 13C NMR spectral analysis of coal. Solid-state 13C NMR analysis techniques have
progressed beyond the mere determination of aromaticity and can now describe features such as
the number of aromatic carbons per cluster and the number of attachments per aromatic cluster.
These 13C NMR data have been used to better understand the complicated structure of coal, to
compare structural differences in coal, tar, and char, and to model coal devolatilization.
Unfortunately, due to the expense of the process, extensive 13C NMR data are not available for
most coals. A non
linear correlation has been developed that predicts the chemical structure
parameters of both U.S. and non-U.S. coals generally measured by 13C NMR and often required
for advanced devolatilization models. The chemical structure parameters correlated include (i)
the average molecular weight per side chain (M
δ
); (ii) the average molecular weight per aromatic
cluster (M
cl); (iii) the ratio of bridges to total attachments (p
0); and (iv) the total attachments per
cluster (σ + 1). The correlation is based on ultimate and proximate analysis, which are generally
known for most coals. 13C NMR data from 30 coals were used to develop this correlation. The
correlation has been used to estimate the chemical structure parameters generally obtained from
13C NMR measurements, and then applied to coal devolatilization predictions using the CPD
model and compared with measured total volatiles and tar yields. The predicted yields compare
well with measured yields for most coals.
Soot samples, including the associated organics, produced from an Illinois No. 6 coal (five
samples) and two model compounds, biphenyl (three samples) and pyrene (two samples), have
been studied by 13C NMR methods. The coal soot data served as a guide to selection of the
temperature range that would be most fruitful for investigation of the evolution of aerosols
composed of soot and tars that are generated from model compounds. The evolution of the different
materials in the gas phase followed different paths. The coal derived soots exhibited loss of
aliphatic and oxygen functional groups prior to significant growth in average aromatic cluster
size. Between 1410 and 1530 K, line broadening occurs in the aromatic band, which appears to
have a Lorentzian component that is observable at the lower temperature and is quite pronounced
at the higher temperature. The data indicate that the average aromatic cluster size (the number
of carbon atoms in an aromatic ring system where the rings are connected through aromatic
bridgehead carbon atoms) may be as large as 80−90 carbons/cluster. The data obtained for the
biphenyl samples exhibit a different path for pyrolysis and soot growth. A significant amount of
ring opening reactions occurs, followed by major structural rearrangements, after the initial ring
opening and hydrogen transfer phase. The cluster size not only grows significantly, but the cross-linking structure also increases, indicating that soot growth in biphenyl soots consists not only
of cluster size growth but also cluster cross-linking. The evolution of pyrene aerosol samples
follows still another path. Little evidence is noted for ring opening reactions. Major ring growth
has not occurred at 1410 K but cross-linking reactions are noted, indicating the formation of
dimer/trimer structures. Although a significant amount of ring growth is noted, the data are
inconclusive regarding the mechanism for ring growth in the pyrene aerosols between 1410 and
1460 K.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.