Hip arthroplasty is a common surgical procedure, but the diagnosis of infection associated with hip arthroplasty remains challenging. Fluorine-18 fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) has been shown to be a promising imaging modality in settings where infection is suspected. However, inflammatory reaction to surgery can result in increased FDG uptake at various anatomic locations, which may erroneously be interpreted as sites of infection. The purpose of this study was to assess the patterns and time course of FDG accumulation following total hip replacement over an extended period of time. Firstly, in a prospective study nine patients with total hip replacement were investigated to determine the patterns of FDG uptake over time. Three FDG-PET scans were performed in each patient at about 3, 6 and 12 months post arthroplasty. Secondly, in a retrospective analysis, the medical and surgical history and FDG-PET imaging results of 710 patients who had undergone whole-body scans for the evaluation of possible malignant disorders were reviewed. The history of arthroplasty and FDG-PET findings in the hip region were reviewed for this study. Patients with symptomatic arthroplasties or related complaints during FDG-PET scanning were excluded from the analysis. During the entire study period, all nine patients enrolled in the prospective study were demonstrated to have increased FDG uptake around the femoral head or neck portion of the prosthesis that extended to the soft tissues surrounding the femur. Among the patients reviewed in the retrospective study, 18 patients with a history of 21 hip arthroplasties who were asymptomatic at the time of FDG-PET scan met the criteria for inclusion. The time interval between the hip arthroplasty and the FDG-PET study ranged from 3 months to 288 months (mean+/-SD: 80.4+/-86.2 months). In 81% (17 of 21) of these prostheses, increased FDG uptake could be noted around the femoral head or neck portion of the prosthesis. The average time interval between arthroplasty and FDG-PET scan in these patients was 71.3 months. In only four prostheses (19%, 4 of 21) was no abnormally increased FDG uptake seen around the prostheses or adjacent sites. The average time interval in these patients was 114.8 months. It is concluded that following hip arthroplasty, non-specifically increased FDG uptake around the head or neck of the prosthesis persists for many years, even in patients without any complications. Therefore, to minimize the number of false-positive results for infection with PET studies obtained to evaluate a painful hip prosthesis, caution should be exercised when interpreting FDG uptake around the head or neck portion of the prosthesis.
The basis of tonic vs. phasic contractile phenotypes of visceral smooth muscles is poorly understood. We used gel electrophoresis and quantitative scanning densitometry to measure the content and isoform composition of contractile proteins in opossum lower esophageal sphincter (LES), to represent tonic muscle, and circular muscle of the esophageal body (EB), to represent phasic smooth muscle. The amount of protein in these two types of muscles is similar: ∼27 mg/g of frozen tissue. There is no difference in the relative proportion of myosin, actin, calponin, and tropomyosin in the two muscle types. However, the EB contains ∼2.4-times more caldesmon than the LES. The relative ratios of α- to γ-contractile isoforms of actin are 0.9 in the LES and 0.3 in EB. The ratio between acidic (LC17a) and basic (LC17b) isoforms of the 17-kDa essential light chain of myosin is 0.7:1 in the LES, compared with 2.7:1 in the EB. There is no significant difference in the ratios of smooth muscle myosin SM1 and SM2 isoforms in the two muscle types. The level of the myosin heavy chain isoform, which contains the seven-amino acid insert in the myosin head, is about threefold higher in the EB compared with LES. In conclusion, the esophageal phasic muscle in contrast to the tonic LES contains proportionally more caldesmon, LC17a, and seven-amino acid-inserted myosin and proportionally less α-actin. These differences may provide a basis for functional differences between tonic and phasic smooth muscles.
Ten per cent of patients with hip replacement will eventually complain of significant pain after surgery, often requiring a revision arthroplasty. The majority of these patients experience aseptic loosening rather than infection. Despite significant advances made in diagnostic imaging, distinguishing infection from aseptic loosening remains a significant challenge. Imaging using fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) has been reported to have excellent sensitivity in detecting infections associated with hip prostheses. However, in some studies, a high rate of false positive results has been reported, especially when increased tracer uptake adjacent to the prosthesis (which is not surrounded by bone) is used as the sole criterion for diagnosing infection. The objective of this investigation was to determine the optimal criteria for diagnosing periprosthetic infection, thereby avoiding false positive results in this setting. A total of 41 total hip arthroplasties from 32 patients and for whom complete clinical follow-up was available were included in this analysis. The location and intensity of FDG uptake were determined for each scan. Final diagnosis was made by microbiology, histopathology, surgical findings and clinical follow-up. Patients who did not undergo surgery were followed up to at least 9 months. Twelve patients were proven eventually to have periprosthetic infection. Images from 11 of these patients displayed increased tracer uptake along the interface between bone and prosthesis. The intensity of the increased tracer uptake varied from mild to moderate, with standardized uptake values less than 2. In contrast, images from uninfected, loose hip prostheses revealed very intense uptake around the head or neck of the prosthesis with standardized uptake values as high as 7. It is concluded that the intensity of increased FDG uptake is less important than the location of increased FDG uptake when FDG PET is used to diagnose periprosthetic infection in patients with hip arthroplasty. Using increased uptake as the sole criterion for diagnosing infection will result in false positive results in this setting.
It is known that following a traumatic fracture or surgical intervention, bone scintigraphy reveals positive results for an extended period of time, posing a challenge when evaluating patients for possible malignancy or superimposed osteomyelitis. Previous reports indicate that acute fractures can also result in increased fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) accumulation and therefore cause difficulties when patients are evaluated for other indications by FDG-PET. The purpose of this study was to assess the pattern and time course of abnormal FDG uptake following traumatic or surgical fracture. A total of 1,517 consecutive patients who underwent whole-body FDG-PET imaging were retrospectively studied. A history of fractures or orthopedic intervention was obtained from an interview prior to scanning. The FDG-PET results were compared with the results of other imaging studies, including bone scans, radiographs, CT, and MRI, as well as surgical pathology reports. Thirty-seven patients with a known date of traumatic or surgical fracture were identified. Among these, 14 had fractures or surgery within 3 months prior to FDG-PET, while 23 had fractures or surgical intervention greater than 3 months prior to FDG-PET. FDG-PET showed no abnormally increased uptake at the known fracture or surgical sites in 30 of these patients. Notably, in the 23 patients with fractures more than 3 months old, all but one showed no abnormally increased uptake. Furthermore, the positive FDG uptake in this exception was a result of complicating osteomyelitis. In the 14 patients with a history of fracture less than 3 months old, only six had abnormally increased FDG uptake. Following traumatic or surgical fractures, FDG uptake is expected to be normal within 3 months unless the process is complicated by infection or malignancy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.