We have characterized the gene flowering promoting factor1 (FPF1), which is expressed in apical meristems immediately after the photoperiodic induction of flowering in the long-day plants mustard and Arabidopsis. In early transition stages, expression is only detectable in the peripheral zone of apical meristems; however, later on, it can also be found in floral meristems and in axillary meristems that form secondary inflorescences. The FPF1 gene encodes a 12.6-kD protein that has no homology to any previously identified protein of known function. Constitutive expression of the gene in Arabidopsis under control of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter resulted in a dominant heritable trait of early flowering under both short- and long-day conditions. Treatments with gibberellin (GA) and paclobutrazol, a GA biosynthesis inhibitor, as well as crosses with GA-deficient mutants indicate that FPF1 is involved in a GA-dependent signaling pathway and modulates a GA response in apical meristems during the transition to flowering.

Small jejunal diverticulitis is very rare, presenting in 0.06% to 1.3% of the population. Many patients remain asymptomatic or have nonspecific symptoms such as malabsorption and abdominal pain, making diagnosis complicated. Up to 6% of patients present with acute perforation. Here, we present such a case involving a 69-year-old female who presented with altered mental status due to sepsis and generalized peritonitis from a perforated jejunal diverticulum that was successfully managed with definitive surgery. We highlight the importance of maintaining a broad differential, early resuscitation, and prompt surgical management in complicated jejunal diverticulitis. Although adjunctive studies such as computed tomography may be helpful in stable patients, definitive surgery was both diagnostic and therapeutic in this case.

Objective Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) is a relatively recent development in the management of carotid artery occlusive disease, the utilization of which is becoming more prevalent. This study aims to evaluate the timing, prevalence, and types of hemodynamic instability after TCAR. Methods We performed a retrospective review of all TCAR procedures performed at two tertiary care academic medical centers within a single hospital system from 2017 through 2019. Demographics, comorbidities, preoperative patient factors, procedural details, and postoperative data were collected. Patients were assessed over 24 hours postoperatively for stroke, death, myocardial infarction (MI), and hemodynamic instability at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 24 hour intervals. Hemodynamic instability was defined as any vital sign abnormality which required pharmacological intervention with antihypertensive, vasopressor, and/or anti-arrhythmic agents. The incidence and timing of postoperative complications and hemodynamic instability were recorded. Results During the study period, 76 patients 80 TCAR procedures. Out of 80 procedures, 64 (80.0%) were receiving home antihypertensive medication and 28 (35.0%) were symptomatic lesions preoperatively. Intraoperatively, one patient (1.3%) received atropine, 26 (32.5%) received glycopyrrolate, 76 (95%) underwent predilatation, and 16 (20.0%) underwent postdilatation. Postoperatively, a total of 22 cases (27.5%) required medication for acute control of blood pressure or heart rate, which reached a peak of 19 patients (23.8%) within the first 3 hours, and tapered to nine patients (11.3%) by the 24 hour mark. A total of three patients (3.75%) required initiation of pharmacological management after the three-hour mark. Six patients (7.5%) underwent stroke code workup, 4 (5.0%) of whom were confirmed to have stroke on CT. Average time to neurologic event was 3.9 hours. No patients experienced MI or death. Median ICU and hospital days for unstable patients were two and three, respectively, compared to one and one for stable patients. Conclusions Hemodynamic instability is common after TCAR and reliably presents at or before postoperative hour 3. Hypo- followed by hyper-tension were the most common manifestations of hemodynamic instability. Regardless, unstable patients and stroke patients were more likely to require longer periods of time in the ICU and in the hospital overall. This may have implications for postoperative ICU resource management when deciding to transfer patients out of a monitored setting. Further study is required to establish relationships between pre- and intra-operative risk factors and outcomes such as hemodynamic instability and/or stroke. At present, one should proceed with careful evaluation of preoperative medications, strict management of postoperative hemodynamics, and clear communication among team members should all be employed to optimize outcomes.

No abstract

No abstract