Background: Telemedicine platforms have been developed to support the convenient delivery of health care services to their patients while maintaining appropriate quality of care. However, it is unclear whether they can be utilized effectively in patients with pediatric spinal deformity (PSD). Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and patient satisfaction associated with virtual visit (VV) utilization in PSD patients in comparison to general pediatric orthopaedic indications. Methods: Of the 482 VVs offered to pediatric orthopaedic patients at a large academic health care system between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2018, a total of 189 VVs conducted by board-certified orthopaedic surgeons were included in the final analysis. Patient satisfaction scores were collected at the end of each VV by patient and parent rankings of the surgeon and the telemedicine service. Data on patients, visits, and connectivity sessions characteristics were collected and statistically compared between PSD visits (n=33) versus those conducted for general pediatric orthopaedic indications (n=156). Results: Although PSD patients were older (15±3.7 vs. 12±4.7 y; P<0.01), mostly female (76% vs. 47%, P=0.003), and had longer VVs (8±4.6 vs. 5±3.6 min; P=0.003) versus their general pediatric orthopaedic counterparts, they demonstrated similarly high satisfaction scores for surgeon performance (5±0 vs. 4.8±0.1 points; P=0.08) and overall satisfaction (3±2.4 vs. 3.5±2.1; P=0.23). Approximately 80% of all VVs were conducted over mobile devices. Wait time was substantially less for PSD VVs relative to subsequent office visits (13±10 vs. 41±30 min; P<0.001). Conclusions: Our analysis found that telemedicine VVs provided a convenient alternative to traditional in-office visits for PSD patients. Specifically, we found that PSD patients received faster care with comparable satisfaction. The findings of our present analysis should encourage health care systems to continually evaluate and implement telehealth platforms to improve both the accessibility and appropriate quality of care. Level of Evidence: Level IV.

No abstract

Study Design: Retrospective comparative cohort study. Objective: To evaluate: (1) pain relief efficacy; (2) opioid consumption; (3) length of stay (LOS); (4) discharge disposition (DD); and (5) safety and adverse effects of liposomal bupivacaine (LB) in pediatric patients who underwent spinal deformity correction. Summary of Background Data: LB is a long-acting, locally injectable anesthetic. Previous orthopedic studies investigating its use have been limited to adult patients. The use of LB as part of postoperative pain management in pediatric patients undergoing spine deformity correction surgery is yet to be evaluated. Materials and Methods: A total of 195 patients that received LB as part of their postoperative pain management regimen were compared with 128 patients who received standard pain management without LB. Pain intensity, opioid consumption, LOS, and DD were recorded. Potential LB-related complications were reported as frequencies and statistically compared for superiority. Noninferiority tests were performed using the Farrington-Manning score test. Multivariate tests based on generalized estimating equations were performed to determine the common and average treatment effects. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Results: The LB cohort demonstrated lower pain scores [postoperative day 1 (POD 1)—median=2, interquartile range (IQR)=(0–5) vs. 5 (2.5–7); POD 2—3 (0–5) vs. 4 (3–6); P<0.001], lower overall opioid consumption (78.2 vs. 129 morphine milligram equivalents; P=0.0001) and consistently from POD 0 to 3 (mean differences; 7.47, 9.04, 17.2, and 17.3 morphine milligram equivalents, respectively; P<0.01), shorter LOS (median=3 d, IQR=3–4 vs. 4 d, IQR=4–6; P<0.001), and similar to-home DD (98% vs. 97%). Complications were similar among the cohorts in superiority and 10% noninferiority analyses. Patients in the LB cohort had lower odds for complications (odds ratio=0.77; 95% CI, 0.64–0.93; P=0.009 and 0.67; 95% CI, 0.50–0.90; P=0.008). Conclusions: This study demonstrated the safety and efficacy of LB when added to the current multimodal postoperative pain management regimens after pediatric spinal surgery. Level of Evidence: Level III.

No abstract

We investigated serum levels of lidocaine and bupivacaine following their intraarticular and subcutaneous injection for anesthetic effect in local technique knee arthroscopy. Fifteen patients scheduled for knee arthroscopy, but who were otherwise healthy, were studied. Following preparation of the knee, 25 cc of 1% lidocaine with epinephrine (1:100,000) and 25 cc of 0.25% bupivacaine were instilled into the knee joint. An additional 40 cc of the combined solution was used to anesthetize four arthroscopic portal sites from the skin into the joint capsule. The arthroscopic procedure was then performed. We took blood samples 5, 15, 30, 60, and 120 minutes after intraarticular injection. High-performance liquid chromatography was used to determine serum values of the agents. Levels of the anesthetic agents in all of the patients at all time intervals were well within the ranges considered safe. Patient surveys of these and 49 other patients indicated a high degree of satisfaction with the technique. No complications from the anesthetic agents were noted at our hospital in over 500 similar cases. We conclude that local anesthesia as described here is a safe and effective alternative to conventional anesthetic techniques. Additionally, it can save time in the operating room and reduce patient costs.