The overall pathogenesis of bladder cancer is still unknown. The microbiota has been shown to play a critical role in the development of different types of cancer. Nevertheless, the role of the microbiota in the development of bladder cancer is still not fully discovered. This review aims to assess the urinary, vaginal, and intestinal microbiota analyzed from the bacterial, viral, and fungal compartments of bladder cancer patients compared with the microbiota of controls to reveal possible differences. A systematic review according to the PRISMA guidelines will be performed. The findings will be presented in narrative form as well as in tables and graphs.

Background: With the expanding indications and thus broader use of immune checkpoint inhibitors, clinicians are faced with a new kind of immune-related adverse events. Because of their immune modulating effects, immune checkpoint inhibitors have the potential to worsen autoimmunity in general. Paraneoplastic syndromes can be caused by tumor-induced autoimmune mechanisms. The use of immune-activating substances such as checkpoint inhibitors might lead to exacerbation of paraneoplastic syndromes causing premature discontinuation of the immunotherapy. Case presentation: We report on a 64-year-old patient with metastasized renal cell carcinoma who developed acute kidney failure after cytoreductive nephrectomy. Work-up revealed a paraneoplastic syndrome that caused tubulointerstitial nephritis (TIN). Glucocorticoid therapy successfully reversed the acute kidney injury. However, adjuvant therapy with Nivolumab provoked a flare-up of the paraneoplastic syndrome on two occasions, eventually leading to a treatment discontinuation. Conclusions: Many cases of Nivolumab-induced TIN have been described lately. However, our case demonstrates therapy failure due to a flare-up of a pre-existing paraneoplastic syndrome of the renal cancer. Against this background, it can only be speculated that some of the TIN cases discussed in prior literature might also have been flare-ups of subclinical autoimmunity.

OBJECTIVES: Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer closely monitors patients conservatively instead of the pursuit of active treatment to reduce overtreatment of insignificant disease. Since 2009, active surveillance has been recommended as the primary management option in the European Association of Urology guidelines for low-risk disease. The present study aimed to investigate the use and uptake of active surveillance over 10 years in our certified prostate cancer centre (University Hospital of Zurich) compared with those derived from the cancer registry of the canton of Zurich, Switzerland. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified all men diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer at our institution and from the cancer registry of the canton of Zurich from 2009 to 2018. The primary treatment of each patient was recorded. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the use of different treatments in our centre. The results were compared with those derived from the cancer registry. RESULTS: A total of 3393 men with low-risk prostate cancer were included in this study (University Hospital of Zurich: n = 262; cancer registry: n = 3131). In the University Hospital of Zurich and cancer registry cohorts, 146 (55.7%) and 502 (16%) men underwent active surveillance, respectively. The proportions of local treatment [115 (43.9%) vs 2220 (71%)] and androgen deprivation therapy [0 (0%) vs 43 (1.4%)] were distinctly lower in the University Hospital of Zurich cohort than in the cancer registry cohort. The uptake of active surveillance over the years was high in the University Hospital of Zurich cohort (35.4% in 2009 and 88.2% in 2018) but only marginal in the cancer registry cohort (12.2% in 2009 and 16.2% in 2018). CONCLUSION:Despite clear guideline recommendations, active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer is still widely underused. Our analysis showed that access to a certified interdisciplinary tumour board significantly increases the use of active surveillance.