LPS activates both MyD88-dependent and -independent signaling via TLR4, but the extent to which each cascade is operative in different cell types remains unclear. This prompted us to revisit the intriguing issue of CXCL10 production, which we previously showed to be inducible in neutrophils stimulated with LPS and IFN-γ but not with either stimulus alone, contrary to other myeloid cells. We now report that in neutrophils the MyD88-independent pathway is not activated by LPS. Indeed, microarray and real-time PCR experiments showed that neither IFNβ nor IFNβ-dependent genes (including CXCL10) are inducible in LPS-treated neutrophils, in contrast to monocytes. Further investigation into the inability of LPS to promote IFNβ expression in neutrophils revealed that the transcription factors regulating the IFNβ enhanceosome, such as IFN-regulatory factor-3 and AP-1, are not activated in LPS-treated neutrophils as revealed by lack of dimerization, nuclear translocation, confocal microscopy, and inducible binding to DNA. Moreover, we show that the upstream TANK-binding kinase-1 is not activated by LPS in neutrophils. A lack of IFNβ/CXCL10 mRNA expression and IFN-regulatory factor 3 activation was also observed in myeloid leukemia HL60 cells differentiated to granulocytes and then stimulated with LPS, indicating that the inability of neutrophils to activate the MyD88-independent pathway represents a feature of their terminal maturation. These results identify a disconnected activation of the two signaling pathways downstream of TLR4 in key cellular components of the inflammatory and immune responses and help us to better understand the primordial role of neutrophils in host defense against nonviral infections.

The ability of human neutrophils to express a variety of genes encoding inflammatory mediators is well documented, and mounting evidence suggests that neutrophil-derived cytokines and chemokines contribute to the recruitment of discrete leukocyte populations at inflammatory sites. Despite this, our understanding of the signaling intermediates governing the generation of inflammatory cytokines by neutrophils remains fragmentary. Here, we report that inhibitors of the p38 MAPK and MEK pathways substantially diminish the release of (and in the case of p38 inhibitors, the gene expression of) several inflammatory cytokines in neutrophils stimulated with LPS or TNF. In addition, various NF-kappaB inhibitors were found to profoundly impede the inducible gene expression and release of inflammatory cytokines in these cells. The MAPK inhibitors did not affect NF-kappaB activation; instead, the transcriptional effects of the p38 MAPK inhibitor appear to involve transcriptional factor IID. Conversely, the NF-kappaB inhibitors failed to affect the activation of MAPKs. Finally, the MAPK inhibitors were found to prevent the activation a key component of the translational machinery, S6 ribosomal protein, in keeping with their post-transcriptional impact on cytokine generation. To our knowledge, this constitutes the first demonstration that in neutrophils, the inducible expression of proinflammatory cytokines by physiological stimuli largely reflects the ability of the latter to activate NF-kappaB and selected MAPK pathways. Our data also raise the possibility that NF-kappaB or MAPK inhibitors could be useful in the treatment of inflammatory disorders in which neutrophils predominate.

BackgroundHIV-1 translation is modulated by the activation of the interferon (IFN)-inducible Protein Kinase RNA-activated (PKR). PKR phosphorylates its downstream targets, including the alpha subunit of the eukaryotic translation Initiation Factor 2 (eIF2α), which decreases viral replication. The PKR Activator (PACT) is known to activate PKR after a cellular stress. In lymphocytic cell lines, HIV-1 activates PKR only transiently and not when cells replicate the virus at high levels. The regulation of this activation is due to a combination of viral and cellular factors that have been only partially identified.ResultsPKR is transiently induced and activated in peripheral blood mononuclear cells after HIV-1 infection. The addition of IFN reduces viral replication, and induces both the production and phosphorylation of PKR. In lymphocytic Jurkat cells infected by HIV-1, a multiprotein complex around PKR contains the double-stranded RNA binding proteins (dsRBPs), adenosine deaminase acting on RNA (ADAR)1 and PACT. In HEK 293T cells transfected with an HIV-1 molecular clone, PACT unexpectedly inhibited PKR and eIF2α phosphorylation and increased HIV-1 protein expression and virion production in the presence of either endogenous PKR alone or overexpressed PKR. The comparison between different dsRBPs showed that ADAR1, TAR RNA Binding Protein (TRBP) and PACT inhibit PKR and eIF2α phosphorylation in HIV-infected cells, whereas Staufen1 did not. Individual or a combination of short hairpin RNAs against PACT or ADAR1 decreased HIV-1 protein expression. In the astrocytic cell line U251MG, which weakly expresses TRBP, PACT mediated an increased HIV-1 protein expression and a decreased PKR phosphorylation. In these cells, a truncated PACT, which constitutively activates PKR in non-infected cells showed no activity on either PKR or HIV-1 protein expression. Finally, PACT and ADAR1 interact with each other in the absence of RNAs.ConclusionIn contrast to its previously described activity, PACT contributes to PKR dephosphorylation during HIV-1 replication. This activity is in addition to its heterodimer formation with TRBP and could be due to its binding to ADAR1. HIV-1 has evolved to replicate in cells with high levels of TRBP, to induce the expression of ADAR1 and to change the function of PACT for PKR inhibition and increased replication.

A singular feature of human neutrophils is that they constitutively express substantial amounts of NF-κB/Rel proteins and IκB-α in the nucleus. In this study, we show that in these cells, IκB kinase α (IKKα), IKKβ, and IKKγ also partially localize to the nucleus, whereas IKK-related kinases (IKKε, TANK-binding kinase-1) are strictly cytoplasmic, and the NF-κB-inducing kinase is strictly nuclear. Following neutrophil activation, IKKβ and IKKγ become transiently phosphorylated in both the cytoplasm and nucleus, whereas IKKα transiently vanishes from both compartments in what appears to be an IKKβ-dependent process. These responses are paralleled by the degradation of IκB-α, and by the phosphorylation of RelA on serine 536, in both compartments. Although both proteins can be IKK substrates, inhibition of IKK prevented IκB-α phosphorylation, while that of RelA was mostly unaffected. Finally, we provide evidence that the nuclear IKK isoforms (α, β, γ) associate with chromatin following neutrophil activation, which suggests a potential role in gene regulation. This is the first study to document IKK activation and the phosphorylation of NF-κB/Rel proteins in primary neutrophils. More importantly, our findings unveil a hitherto unsuspected mode of activation for the IKK/IκB signaling cascade within the cell nucleus.