No abstract

The new technique of laser Doppler scanning (LDS) provides a 2-dimensional pattern of cutaneous microcirculation, which offers a visual image and can quantify the intensity and expansion of perfusion. With the help of this technique, we examined the microcirculatory pattern of Type IV reactions to recall antigens, which were applied using a test stamp (Multitest Merieux). The measurements were performed before application of the test stamp as well as 10 min, 24, 48 and 72 h afterwards. The inflammatory hyperemia was evaluated using LDS and unidimensional laser Doppler fluxmetry. The diameter of the inflammatory infiltrate was quantified by means of palpation, the thickness by means of high-resolution 20 MHz sonography. The clinically visible erythema was measured planimetrically. An unspecific hyperemia resulting from the trauma of the stamp revealed no evident infiltrate under sonography 10 min after the test application. Depending of the individual reaction, the mean flux and the expansion of the hyperemia were at their peak after 48 h. The flux values were at a maximum in the center of the inflammatory reaction and dropped continuously toward the periphery. The area of the hyperemia seen in the LDS image was significantly larger than the expansion of the erythema measured planimetrically, but there was a significant correlation. The perfusion correlated significantly with the infiltration diameter (24 h, 48 h, 72 h) and the infiltration thickness 48 h after testing. All in all, it was possible to measure directly and without touching the skin and to quantify a subclinical pattern of skin perfusion as a response to and inflammatory reaction on a 2-dimensional display.

Background: Evaluation techniques for determining the strength of action and the onset of activity of H₁ receptor blockers have not yet been sufficiently standardized. Objective: The clinical efficacy of the H₁ receptor blocker loratadine was to be measured upon a wheal response subsequent to an intracutaneous injection of 0.1 ml histamine (0.1%). Methods: In a pilot study, 10 patients were treated with the H₁ receptor blocker loratadine for a period of 7 days. Various noninvasive measurement techniques, i.e. 20-MHz sonography, laser-Doppler flowmetry, chromatometry using the Lab* system and computer-assisted planimetry, were applied to provide a quantitative evaluation of the wheal and the marginal erythema. Using these quantification methods, the development of the urticarial reaction 20 min after injection and its decline were evaluated. Results: The urticarial reaction was reduced substantially under treatment with 10 mg loratadine over a period of 7 days. The methods we used could accurately quantify different aspects of the urticarial reaction noninvasively. Conclusions: All of the chosen measurement techniques are widely recognized. For objective assessment of the urticarial reaction with high-frequency ultrasound, we recommend the measurement of the distance between skin entrance echo and fascia since the demarcation of the wheal is often impossible by ultrasound. In order to improve comparison of results of various workgroups in the future, we therefore suggest the use of the selected combination of noninvasive procedures as a standard for evaluating the efficacy of H₁ receptor blockers.

In summary, the synthetic steroids MF and MP presented side-effects similar to those of OH-C but much greater vasoconstrictor effect; after an application period of over 5 days under occlusion a blanching effect in our model was not demonstrable by means of chromometry. Two-dimensional laser scanning offers no advantage in the evaluation of the blanching effect in comparison to one-dimensional laser fluxmetry (LDF).