Amidst the concurrent global crises of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), uprisings against Anti-Black racism and police brutality, as well as anti-Asian racism and violence, the field of medicine found itself simultaneously called upon to respond as essential workers in the public health devastation of COVID-19, and as representatives of healthcare institutions wrought with the impacts of systemic racism. Clinicians, researchers, and advocates in adolescent and young adult (AYA) oncology, must come together in authentic activism to begin the work of creating structural change to advance antiracist approaches to patient engagement in AYA oncology research and advocacy. Critical review of existing practices is needed to ensure that ethical and effective research methods are employed when engaging with racial and ethnic minority AYA patients with cancer, who may be particularly vulnerable and exploited in the current context.

No abstract

No abstract

163 Background: Cancer can be a setback for young active-duty military patients, with potential implications for their financial well-being, early career paths, and young families. Despite the assumption of sufficient material support for military patients, cancer and its treatments still result in substantial out-of-pocket expenses and lost-opportunity costs that can lead to financial hardship. Although prior cancer survivorship studies have put forth a material, psychosocial, and behavioral conceptual framework for describing financial hardship following a cancer diagnosis, it is unknown whether this framework adequately depicts the experience of financial hardship among military adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients. The primary aim of the current study was to extend this conceptual model of financial hardship following a cancer diagnosis for application among military AYA patients. Methods: Using Gale and colleagues’ Framework Method for qualitative multi-disciplinary health research, the investigator team conducted focus groups and key informant interviews (n=24) with active-duty AYA cancer patients, cancer care providers, and commanding officers at both a military medical center and a military post in Hawaii. Subsequently, content analysis and thematic abstraction produced results that were sorted to characterize the material, psychosocial, and behavioral domains of financial hardship. Finally, investigators employed health behavioral change theories to construct a conceptual framework. Results: Data analysis revealed that young active-duty military patients’ experiences of financial hardship following a cancer diagnosis occur within material, psychosocial, and behavioral domains that are uniquely situated within the environments of AYA development and military culture. Hence, we elaborated upon an existing conceptual framework of the financial hardship of cancer, by extending it to capture two meso-level contexts that emerged from our findings: (1) life course development and (2) occupational culture. Conclusions: Differentiating individual experiences of financial hardship within the contexts of life course development and occupational culture, may enable the development of interventions that are informed by the aspect of financial hardship most impacted by cancer care for this special population. Future research should further explicate the meso-level contexts in our study, and investigate the associations among and between factors within these social and environmental contexts.

No abstract