Smad transcription factors activated by TGF-β or by BMP receptors form trimeric complexes with Smad4 to target specific genes for cell fate regulation. The CAGAC motif has been considered as the main binding element for Smad2/3/4, whereas Smad1/5/8 have been thought to preferentially bind GC-rich elements. However, chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis in embryonic stem cells showed extensive binding of Smad2/3/4 to GC-rich cis-regulatory elements. Here, we present the structural basis for specific binding of Smad3 and Smad4 to GC-rich motifs in the goosecoid promoter, a nodal-regulated differentiation gene. The structures revealed a 5-bp consensus sequence GGC(GC)|(CG) as the binding site for both TGF-β and BMP-activated Smads and for Smad4. These 5GC motifs are highly represented as clusters in Smad-bound regions genome-wide. Our results provide a basis for understanding the functional adaptability of Smads in different cellular contexts, and their dependence on lineage-determining transcription factors to target specific genes in TGF-β and BMP pathways.

Summary TGF-β and BMP signaling is mediated by Smads 1–5 (R-Smads and Co-Smads) and inhibited by Smad7, a major hub of regulation of TGF-β and BMP receptors by negative feedback and antagonistic signals. The transcription coactivator YAP and the E3 ubiquitin ligases Smurf1/2 and Nedd4L target R-Smads for activation or degradation, respectively. Pairs of WW domain in these regulators bind PY motifs and adjacent CDK/MAPK and GSK3 phosphorylation sites in R-Smads in a selective and regulated manner. In contrast, here we show that Smad7 binds YAP, Smurf1, Smurf2 and Nedd4L constitutively, the binding involving a PY motif in Smad7 and no phosphorylation. We also provide a structural basis for how regulators that use WW domain pairs for selective interactions with R-Smads, resort to one single versatile WW domain for binding Smad7 to centralize regulation in the TGF-β and BMP pathways.

TGF-β receptors phosphorylate SMAD2 and SMAD3 transcription factors, which then form heterotrimeric complexes with SMAD4 and cooperate with context-specific transcription factors to activate target genes. Here we provide biochemical and structural evidence showing that binding of SMAD2 to DNA depends on the conformation of the E3 insert, a structural element unique to SMAD2 and previously thought to render SMAD2 unable to bind DNA. Based on this finding, we further delineate TGF-β signal transduction by defining distinct roles for SMAD2 and SMAD3 with the forkhead pioneer factor FOXH1 as a partner in the regulation of differentiation genes in mouse mesendoderm precursors. FOXH1 is prebound to target sites in these loci and recruits SMAD3 independently of TGF-β signals, whereas SMAD2 remains predominantly cytoplasmic in the basal state and set to bind SMAD4 and join SMAD3:FOXH1 at target promoters in response to Nodal TGF-β signals. The results support a model in which signal-independent binding of SMAD3 and FOXH1 prime mesendoderm differentiation gene promoters for activation, and signal-driven SMAD2:SMAD4 binds to promoters that are preloaded with SMAD3:FOXH1 to activate transcription.

We investigated the mechanisms of activation and degradation of the E3 ubiquitin ligase Nedd4L combining the available biochemical information with complementary biophysical techniques. Using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, we identified that the C2 domain binds Ca(2+) and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3) using the same interface that is used to interact with the HECT domain. Thus, we propose that the transition from the closed to the active form is regulated by a competition of IP3 and Ca(2+) with the HECT domain for binding to the C2 domain. We performed relaxation experiments and molecular dynamic simulations to determine the flexibility of the HECT structure and observed that its conserved PY motif can become solvent-exposed when the unfolding process is initiated. The structure of the WW3 domain bound to the HECT-PY site reveals the details of this interaction, suggesting a possible auto-ubquitination mechanism using two molecules, a partially unfolded one and a fully functional Nedd4L counterpart.

No abstract