Objective. The accuracy of left atrial pulmonary vein CT enhanced single-phase and dual-phase scanning in the detection of left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombosis and spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) before radio frequency ablation was compared in atrial fibrillation patients, so as to optimize the scanning scheme. Methods. 78 patients with atrial fibrillation who were admitted to Cangzhou Central Hospital from October 2020 to September 2021 and underwent bilateral enhanced CT scan of left atrial pulmonary vein and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) examination for planned frequency ablation were selected. TEE results were used as the “gold standard” to compare the diagnostic efficacy of the first phase, second phase, and double-phase comprehensive mode of enhanced left atrial pulmonary vein CT in detecting left atrial thrombosis and SEC. Results. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 88.9%, 84.1%, 42.1%, and 98.3%, respectively, in the detection of left atrial thrombosis and SEC by the first phase of CT enhanced scan. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 22.2%, 98.6%, 66.6%, and 90.7%, respectively, in the detection of left atrial thrombosis and SEC by the second phase of CT enhanced scan. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 88.9%, 84.1%, 42.1%, and 98.3%, respectively, in the detection of left atrial thrombosis and SEC by the double-phase comprehensive mode of CT enhanced scan. There was no statistically significant difference in the accuracy of CT diagnosis of left atrial appendage thrombosis and SEC between the three modes of the first phase, the second phase, and the double-phase comprehensive CT ( P > 0.05 ). The mean effective radiation dose of double-phase enhanced scan was 7.49 ± 1.02 mSv. Conclusion. Single-phase enhanced CT scan of left atrial pulmonary vein can meet clinical requirements and significantly reduce the radiation dose compared with double-phase enhanced CT scan. Therefore, it is recommended as an initial screening examination for patients with atrial fibrillation before radiofrequency ablation.
Breast cancer is one of the most common malignancies in women. However, cases of vaginal metastases of breast cancer are rarely reported in China and abroad. The main clinical symptom of vaginal metastases of breast cancer is vaginal bleeding. This article aims to provide a reference for the diagnosis and clinical management of vaginal metastases from breast cancer. This article describes in detail the management of a 50-year-old woman with vaginal metastases from breast cancer, who was admitted to the hospital with persistent vaginal bleeding without apparent causes. Persistent vaginal bleeding was found after two and a half years when her breast cancer surgery was performed. After comprehensive evaluation, vaginal mass resection was performed. Postoperative histopathology confirmed that the vaginal mass was breast cancer metastasis. The patient was treated with local radiotherapy and three cycles of eribulin and bevacizumab after the vaginal mass was removed. A reexamination of computed tomography showed that the chest wall metastases were less extensive than before. Orbital metastases were also reduced in size, which was revealed by the physical examination. The patient had since failed to return to hospital on time for a regular treatment due to personal reasons. After 9 months of follow-up, the patient died of multiple metastases. The diagnosis of vaginal masses is based on pathological examination, and systemic treatment should be the mainstay when extensive metastases are presented.
Objective: This study aims to explore the actual meaning of "false positive filling defect" in left atrial appendage (LAA) computed tomography (CT) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) as the gold standard. Methods:Patients with AF undergoing cardiac CT angiography and TEE examinations for proposed radiofrequency catheter ablation between October 2020 and October 2021 were selected as the study subjects. Transesophageal echocardiography was taken as the "gold standard," and spontaneous echocardiographic contrast (SEC) and thrombus events were defined as positive events. The CT manifestations were classified into three groups (true positive, false positive, and true negative) to evaluate the differences in left atrium (LA) anterior-posterior diameter (LAAP), LA anterior wall thickness, and LAA orifice long diameter and short diameter, area, and depth between the three groups. Results:(1) There was no statistical difference in LA anterior wall thickness between the three groups (p > .05); there was a statistical difference in LAAP (only) between the true-positive group and the true-negative group (p < .05). ( 2) There was a statistical difference in LAA orifice long diameter, short diameter, and area between the true-positive group and the true-negative group as well as between the false-positive group and the true-negative group (p < .05). ( 3) There was a statistical difference in LAA depth between the true-positive group and the false-positive group as well as between the true-positive group and the true-negative group (p < .05). ( 4) The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) of LAA depth affecting the LAA thrombus and SEC was 0.863 (confidence interval = 0.718-1.000), the sensitivity was 77.8%, and the specificity was 90.6% for predicting the occurrence of LAA thrombus and SEC in patients with nonvalvular AF (NVAF) and an LAA depth of ≥50.84 mm. Conclusions:There was a difference in LAA diameter between the TEE-based CT false-positive group and the other groups. A "CT false positive" is an objectively existing state, and CT might be able to identify the LAA hemodynamic disorder earlier than How to cite this article:
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.