BackgroundIn 2017, the Chinese government launched a pilot project in palliative care, in which Shanghai was a pioneer. Nurses play a key role in palliative care services as they are the main providers improving the quality of services for patients and their families. However, little is known about practices and influencing factors in the field of palliative care from a nursing perspective in China. This is an original empirical study that has meticulously analyzed the interrelationship and intensity between practices and other factors among nurses in the initial stage of palliative care in primary healthcare institutions in Shanghai, China.MethodsA descriptive-correlational study design was used to sample 2,829 eligible palliative care nurses by purposive sampling survey in 225 healthcare institutions in Shanghai, China. Descriptive analyses were performed using IBM SPSS 24.0 software. Structural equation modeling was applied to analyze the data by AMOS 20.0. Data were collected using the well-designed Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Hospice Care (KAPHC) scale.ResultsThe final model showed a good model fit. Self-efficacy directly influenced practices (β = 0.506, P < 0.01) and indirectly influenced practices (β = 0.028, P < 0.01) through intention. Subjective norm directly influenced practices (β = 0.082, P < 0.01) and indirectly influenced practices (β = 0.030, P < 0.01) through intention. Intention (β = 0.152, P < 0.01) and knowledge (β = 0.068, P < 0.01) directly influenced practices. Perceived susceptibility (β = −0.027, P < 0.01), perceived benefits (β = −0.017, P < 0.01), and perceived barriers (β = −0.014, P < 0.01) indirectly influenced practices through intention.ConclusionThis study provided evidence of the associations of knowledge, perceived susceptibility, benefits, barriers, subjective norm, self-efficacy, intention, and practices among nurses concerning palliative care and interventions improving their actual work practices. Our findings revealed that self-efficacy, intention, and subjective norms greatly influenced practices. It is imperative to take interventions that focus precisely on self-efficacy, intention, and subjective norms to improve nurses' practices.
Background Hospice and palliative care nursing (HPCN) in China is mainly available at public primary care institutions, where nursing homes (NHs) are rarely involved. Nursing assistants (NAs) play an essential role in HPCN multidisciplinary teams, but little is known about their attitudes towards HPCN and related factors. Methods A cross-sectional study was designed to evaluate NAs’ attitudes towards HPCN with an indigenised scale in Shanghai. A total of 165 formal NAs were recruited from 3 urban and 2 suburban NHs between October 2021 and January 2022. The questionnaire was composed of four parts: demographic characteristics, attitudes (20 items with four sub-concepts), knowledge (nine items), and training needs (nine items). Descriptive statistics, independent samples t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson’s correlation, and multiple linear regression were performed to analyse NAs’ attitudes, influencing factors, and their correlations. Results A total of 156 questionnaires were valid. The mean score of attitudes was 72.44 ± 9.56 (range:55–99), with a mean item score of 3.6 ± 0.5 (range:1–5). The highest score rate was “perception of the benefits for the life quality promotion” (81.23%), and the lowest score rate was “perception of the threats from the worsening conditions of advanced patients” (59.92%). NAs’ attitudes towards HPCN were positively correlated with their knowledge score (r = 0.46, P < 0.01) and training needs (r = 0.33, P < 0.01). Marital status (β = 0.185), previous training experience (β = 0.201), location of NHs (β = 0.193), knowledge (β = 0.294), and training needs (β = 0.157) for HPCN constituted significant predictors of attitudes (P < 0.05), which explained 30.8% of the overall variance. Conclusion NAs’ attitudes towards HPCN were moderate, but their knowledge should be improved. Targeted training is highly recommended to improve the participation of positive and enabled NAs and to promote high-quality universal coverage of HPCN in NHs.
BackgroundHospice and palliative care (HPC) aims to improve end-of-life quality and has received much more attention through the lens of an aging population in the midst of the coronavirus disease pandemic. However, several barriers remain in China due to a lack of professional HPC providers with positive behavioral intentions. Therefore, we conducted an original study introducing machine learning to explore individual behavioral intentions and detect factors of enablers of, and barriers to, excavating potential human resources and improving HPC accessibility.MethodsA cross-sectional study was designed to investigate healthcare providers' behavioral intentions, knowledge, attitudes, and practices in hospice care (KAPHC) with an indigenized KAPHC scale. Binary Logistic Regression and Random Forest Classifier (RFC) were performed to model impacting and predict individual behavioral intentions.ResultsThe RFC showed high sensitivity (accuracy = 0.75; F1 score = 0.84; recall = 0.94). Attitude could directly or indirectly improve work enthusiasm and is the most efficient approach to reveal behavioral intentions. Continuous practice could also improve individual confidence and willingness to provide HPC. In addition, scientific knowledge and related skills were the foundation of implementing HPC.ConclusionIndividual behavioral intention is crucial for improving HPC accessibility, particularly at the initial stage. A well-trained RFC can help estimate individual behavioral intentions to organize a productive team and promote additional policies.
Background: Hospice and palliative care (HPC) in China are mainly available at public primary care institutions, where nursing homes (NHs) are rarely involved. Nursing assistants (NAs) play an essential role in the HPC multidisciplinary team, but little is known about their attitudes towards HPC. This study aimed to identify the attitudes and factors influencing HPC among NAs.Methods: A cross-sectional study was designed to evaluate NAs’ attitudes towards HPC with an indigenized scale in Shanghai. A total of 165 formal NAs were recruited from 3 urban and 2 suburban NHs between October 2021 and January 2022. The questionnaire was composed of 4 parts, demographic characteristics, attitudes (20 items with 4 sub-concepts), knowledge (9 items), and training needs (9 items) for HPC. Descriptive statistics, independent samples t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson’s correlation, and multiple linear regression were performed to analyse NAs’ attitudes, influencing factors, and their correlations.Results: In total, 156 questionnaires were valid. The mean score of attitudes was 72.44±9.56 (range: 55~99), with a mean item score of 3.6±0.5 (range: 1~5). The highest score rate was “perception of the benefits for the life quality promotion” (81.23%), and the lowest score rate was “perception of the threats from the worsening conditions of advanced patients” (59.92%). NAs’ attitudes towards HPC were positively correlated with knowledge score (r=0.46, p<0.01) and training needs (r=0.33, p<0.01). Marital status (β=0.185), previous training experience (β=0.201), area of NHs (β=0.193), knowledge of HPC (β=0.294), and training needs (β=0.157) for HPC constituted the significant predictors of attitudes (p<0.05), which explained 30.8% of the overall variance.Conclusion: NAs’ attitudes towards HPC were moderate, but the knowledge level still needs improvement. As integrated HPC in NHs can be achieved only with the participation of positive and enabled NAs, thus targeted training is highly recommended based on the significant factors identified in this study.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.