Campbell, B. C.V. et al. (2019) Penumbral imaging and functional outcome in patients with anterior circulation ischaemic stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy versus medical therapy: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data.ABSTRACT Background: CT-perfusion (CTP) and MRI may assist patient selection for endovascular thrombectomy. We aimed to establish whether imaging assessments of ischaemic core and penumbra volumes were associated with functional outcomes and treatment effect.

Campbell, B. C. V. et al. (2018) Effect of general anaesthesia on functional outcome in patients with anterior circulation ischaemic stroke having endovascular thrombectomy versus standard care: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Neurology, 17(1), pp. 47-53. (doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30407-6) This is the author's final accepted version.There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher's version if you wish to cite from it.http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/149670/ variables. An alternative approach using propensity-score stratification was also used. To account for between-trial variance we used mixed-effects modeling with a random effect for trial incorporated in all models. Bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool.Findings: Of 1764 patients in 7 trials, 871 were allocated to endovascular thrombectomy. After exclusion of 74 patients (72 who did not undergo the procedure and 2 with missing data on anaesthetic strategy), 236/797 (30%) of endovascular patients were treated under GA. At baseline, GA patients were younger and had shorter time to randomisation but similar pre-treatment clinical severity compared to non-GA. Endovascular thrombectomy improved functional outcome at 3 months versus standard care in both GA (adjusted common odds ratio (cOR) 1·52, 95%CI 1·09-2·11, p=0·014) and non-GA (adjusted cOR 2·33, 95%CI 1·75-3·10, p<0·001) patients. However, outcomes were significantly better for those treated under non-GA versus GA (covariate-adjusted cOR 1·53, 95%CI 1·14-2·04, p=0·004; propensitystratified cOR 1·44 95%CI 1·08-1·92, p=0·012). The risk of bias and variability among studies was assessed to be low.Interpretation: Worse outcomes after endovascular thrombectomy were associated with GA, after adjustment for baseline prognostic variables. These data support avoidance of GA whenever possible. The procedure did, however, remain effective versus standard care in patients treated under GA, indicating that treatment should not be withheld in those who require anaesthesia for medical reasons. Funding:The HERMES collaboration was funded by an unrestricted grant from Medtronic to the University of Calgary. Research in contextEvidence before this study between abolition of the thrombectomy treatment effect in MR CLEAN and no effect in THRACE. Three single-centre randomised trials of general anaesthesia versus conscious sedation found either no difference in functional outcome between groups or a slight benefit of general anaesthesia. Added value of this studyThese data from contemporary, high quality randomised trials form the largest study to date of the association between general anesthesia and the benefit of endovascular thrombectomy versus standard care. We used two different approaches to adjust for baseline imbalances (multivariable logistic regression and propensity-score stratification). We found that GA for endovascular thrombectomy, as practiced in contemporary clinical care across a wide range of expert centres during the rand...

Background: Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) is a serious complication after endovascular treatment for ischemic stroke. We aimed to identify determinants of its occurrence and location. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from the Dutch MR CLEAN trial (Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands) and MR CLEAN registry. We included adult patients with a large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation who underwent endovascular treatment within 6.5 hours of stroke onset. We used univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses to identify determinants of overall sICH occurrence, sICH within infarcted brain tissue, and sICH outside infarcted brain tissue. Results: SICH occurred in 203 (6%) of 3313 included patients and was located within infarcted brain tissue in 50 (25%), outside infarcted brain tissue in 23 (11%), and both within and outside infarcted brain tissue in 116 (57%) patients. In 14 patients (7%), data on location were missing. Prior antiplatelet use, baseline systolic blood pressure, baseline plasma glucose levels, post-endovascular treatment modified treatment in cerebral ischemia score, and duration of procedure were associated with all outcome parameters. In addition, determinants of sICH within infarcted brain tissue included history of myocardial infarction (adjusted odds ratio, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.06–2.56]) and poor collateral score (adjusted odds ratio, 1.42 [95% CI, 1.02–1.95]), whereas determinants of sICH outside infarcted brain tissue included level of occlusion on computed tomography angiography (internal carotid artery or internal carotid artery terminus compared with M1: adjusted odds ratio, 1.79 [95% CI, 1.16–2.78]). Conclusions: Several factors, some potentially modifiable, are associated with sICH occurrence. Further studies should investigate whether modification of baseline systolic blood pressure or plasma glucose level could reduce the risk of sICH. In addition, determinants differ per location of sICH, supporting the hypothesis of varying underlying mechanisms. Registration: URL: https://www.isrctn.com/ ; Unique identifier: ISRCTN10888758.

In this prospective randomised controlled multicentre trial, gentamicin implants did not result in a significant overall reduction in surgical site infection following vascular surgery via inguinal incision. In a post hoc subgroup analysis comparing study sites with a low (<10%) and study sites with a high (>10%) infection rate in the control group, gentamicin implants significantly reduced surgical site infections in high risk centres. Therefore, preventive use of gentamicin implants cannot be routinely advised based on current evidence but may be considered in vascular centres with a high incidence of wound infections.Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of gentamicin containing collagen implants in the reduction of surgical site infections (SSIs) in patients undergoing an inguinal incision for vascular surgery. Methods: Prospective blinded randomised controlled multicentre trial (RCT), performed in four hospitals in The Netherlands and Belgium. This study included 288 patients who underwent an inguinal incision for primary arterial repair (femoral endarterectomy, femorofemoral or femoropopliteal bypass, aortobifemoral bypass, thrombectomy, embolectomy, endovascular aneurysm repair) between October 2012 and December 2015. Patients were randomised to receive a gentamicin implant (study group) or no implant (control group). The calculated sample sizes of 304 patients per group were not reached. Primary outcome was SSI incidence after six weeks. Secondary outcomes were time to onset of infection, length of hospital stay, allergic reactions, treatment with antibiotics, need for re-admission, re-operation and mortality. Results: One hundred fifty-one patients were allocated to the study group (mean age 69 AE 9.2 years) and 137 patients were allocated to the control group (mean age 70 AE 10.4 years). Both groups were homogeneous regarding baseline and intra-operative characteristics. Gentamicin implants did not result in a significant overall reduction of SSIs in the study group (7% vs. 12%, p ¼ .17). In a post hoc analysis comparing two study sites with low (<10%) and two study sites with high (>10%) infection rates in the control group, gentamicin implants significantly reduced SSIs in high risk centres (22% vs. 1%, p < .001), whereas there was no significant effect in low risk centres (13% vs. 7%, p ¼ .30). There were no allergic reactions and all secondary outcomes were comparable between groups. Conclusion: Gentamicin implants did not result in a significant overall reduction of SSIs in this RCT. Gentamicin implants did reduce the incidence of SSIs in high risk centres and may be a valuable adjunct to improve outcomes in such vascular centres with a high incidence of wound infections. However, the limitation of not reaching the calculated sample sizes should be considered.

endpoint, no intergroup differences were observed for the different SF-36 sum-and domain scores changes from baseline to five years except for the SF-36 role emotional domain score with a greater improvement in the nonrevascularization group (n¼116, p¼0.007). No intergroup differences were observed in VascuQoL total and domain scores changes (n¼116, n.s.) or treadmill walking distances (n¼91, n.s.). More patients had died in the revascularization group (n¼13 versus n¼7, n.s.) A revascularization strategy resulted in almost twice the cost compared to a non-invasive treatment approach (V10 915 vs V5 804) while there were no difference in the total QALYs per patient between the revascularization and the non-revascularization group. Conclusion: A liberal strategy of revascularization in patients with IC neither translated to any long-term HRQoL benefit nor to improved walking capacity at five years. Revascularization was equally not a cost-effective option from a payer/healthcare perspective. Future research should focus on a more precise targeting of IC subgroups that might still benefit from revascularization.