Autoimmune pancreatitis is seen all around the world, with regional differences in the pathologic and clinical features. Lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis and IDCP have distinct clinical profiles.
Autoimmune pancreatitis is a rare systemic fibrotic inflammatory disorder that can affect organs such as the bile ducts, salivary glands, and retroperitoneal lymph nodes, in addition to the pancreas. Morphological characteristics of autoimmune pancreatitis include a diffusely enlarged 'sausage-shaped' pancreas and an irregularly narrowed duct of Wirsung. According to the revised Japan Pancreas Society criteria, the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis requires that one or more secondary serologic or histologic criteria are also met: the presence of autoantibodies, elevated levels of gamma-globulins, IgG or IgG(4), a lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate, or pancreatic fibrosis. The presence in any affected organ of a lymphoplasmacytic inflammatory infiltrate containing greater than 10 IgG(4)-positive cells per high-power field is pathognomonic for autoimmune pancreatitis. Precise data on the incidence and prevalence of autoimmune pancreatitis are currently not available because most reports involve either limited patient series or resection specimen cohorts. New diagnostic tools and further studies of the underlying pathophysiology and prognosis of autoimmune pancreatitis are needed for adequate and effective treatment strategies to be developed. The most crucial issue when caring for patients with suspected autoimmune pancreatitis is to differentiate autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic carcinoma, because pancreatic carcinoma requires surgery, whereas autoimmune pancreatitis responds well to steroid treatment.
ObjectiveAcute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) is managed by standard endoscopic combination therapy, but a few cases remain difficult and carry a high risk of persistent or recurrent bleeding. The aim of our study was to compare first-line over-the-scope-clips (OTSC) therapy with standard endoscopic treatment in these selected patients.DesignWe conducted a prospective, randomised, controlled, multicentre study (NCT03331224). Patients with endoscopic evidence of acute NVUGIB and high risk of rebleeding (defined as complete Rockall Score ≥7) were included. Primary endpoint was clinical success defined as successful endoscopic haemostasis without evidence of recurrent bleeding.Results246 patients were screened and 100 patients were finally randomised (mean of 5 cases/centre and year; 70% male, 30% female, mean age 78 years; OTSC group n=48, standard group n=52). All but one case in the standard group were treated with conventional clips. Clinical success was 91.7% (n=44) in the OTSC group compared with 73.1% (n=38) in the ST group (p=0.019), with persistent bleeding occurring in 0 vs 6 in the OTSC versus standard group (p=0.027), all of the latter being successfully managed by rescue therapy with OTSC. Recurrent bleeding was observed in four patients (8.3%) in the OTSC group and in eight patients (15.4%) in the standard group (p=0.362).ConclusionOTSC therapy appears to be superior to standard treatment with clips when used by trained physicians for selected cases of primary therapy of NVUGIB with high risk of rebleeding. Further studies are necessary with regards to patient selection to identify subgroups benefiting most from OTSC haemostasis.Trial registration numberNCT03331224.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.