Myxococcus xanthus kills other species to use their biomass as energy source. Its predation mechanisms allow feeding on a broad spectrum of bacteria, but the identity of predation effectors and their mode of action remains largely unknown. We initially focused on the role of hydrolytic enzymes for prey killing and compared the activity of secreted M. xanthus proteins against four prey strains. 72 secreted proteins were identified by mass spectrometry, and among them a family 19 glycoside hydrolase that displayed bacteriolytic activity in vivo and in vitro. This enzyme, which we name LlpM (lectin/lysozyme-like protein of M. xanthus), was not essential for predation, indicating that additional secreted components are required to disintegrate prey. Furthermore, secreted proteins lysed only Gram-positive, but not Gram-negative species. We thus compared the killing of different preys by cell-associated mechanisms: Individual M. xanthus cells killed all four test strains in a cell-contact dependent manner, but were only able to disintegrate Gram-negative, not Gram-positive cell envelopes. Thus, our data indicate that M. xanthus uses different, multifactorial mechanisms for killing and degrading different preys. Besides secreted enzymes, cell-associated mechanisms that have not been characterized so far, appear to play a major role for prey killing. IMPORTANCE Predation is an important survival strategy of the widespread myxobacteria, but it remains poorly understood on the mechanistic level. Without a basic understanding of how prey cell killing and consumption is achieved, it also remains difficult to investigate the role of predation for the complex myxobacterial lifestyle, reciprocal predator-prey relationships or the impact of predation on complex bacterial soil communities. We study predation in the established model organism Myxococcus xanthus, aiming to dissect the molecular mechanisms of prey cell lysis. In this study, we addressed the role of secreted bacteriolytic proteins, as well as potential mechanistic differences in the predation of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Our observation shows that secreted enzymes are sufficient for killing and degrading Gram-positive species, but that cell-associated mechanisms may play a major role for killing Gram-negative and Gram-positive prey on fast timescales.

Bacterial phospholipid N-methyltransferases (Pmts) catalyze the formation of phosphatidylcholine (PC) via successive N-methylation of phosphatidylethanolamine (PE). They are classified into Sinorhizobium-type and Rhodobacter-type enzymes. The Sinorhizobium-type PmtA protein from the plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens is recruited to anionic lipids in the cytoplasmic membrane via two amphipathic helices called αA and αF. Besides its enzymatic activity, PmtA is able to remodel membranes mediated by the αA domain. According to the Heliquest program, αA- and αF-like amphipathic helices are also present in other Sinorhizobium- and Rhodobacter-type Pmt enzymes suggesting a conserved architecture of α-helical membrane-binding regions in these methyltransferases. As representatives of the two Pmt families, we investigated the membrane binding and remodeling capacity of Bradyrhizobium japonicum PmtA (Sinorhizobium-type) and PmtX1 (Rhodobacter-type), which act cooperatively to produce PC in consecutive methylation steps. We found that the αA regions in both enzymes bind anionic lipids similar to αA of A. tumefaciens PmtA. Membrane binding of PmtX1 αA is enhanced by its substrate monomethyl-PE indicating a substrate-controlled membrane association. The αA regions of all investigated enzymes remodel spherical liposomes into tubular filaments suggesting a conserved membrane-remodeling capacity of bacterial Pmts. Based on these results we propose that the molecular details of membrane-binding and remodeling are conserved among bacterial Pmts.