Objective:
To describe variation in local anaesthesia techniques and complications over a 10-year period for cataract surgery in the United Kingdom.
Methods:
Data from the Royal College of Ophthalmologists National Ophthalmology Database was used. Eligible for analysis were 1 195 882 cataract operations performed using local anaesthesia between 01/04/2010 and 31/03/2020 in 80 centres.
Results:
Overall, topical anaesthesia alone was used in 152 321 (12.7%) operations, combined topical and intracameral anaesthesia in 522 849 (43.7%), sub-Tenon’s in 461 175 (38.6%), and peribulbar/retrobulbar anaesthesia in 59 537 (5.0%). In National Health Service (NHS) institutions, 48.3% operations were topical with/without intracameral vs 88.7% in independent sector treatment centres (ISTC). 45.9% were sub-Tenon’s in NHS vs 9.6% in ISTC. 5.8% were peribulbar/retrobulbar in NHS vs 1.7% in ISTC. Anaesthetic complication rates decreased from 2.7% in the 2010 NHS year to 1.5% in the 2019 NHS year (overall, 2.1% for NHS; 0.2% for ISTC). Overall anaesthetic complication rates were 0.3%, 0.3%, 3.5% and 3.1% for topical alone, combined topical/intracameral, sub-Tenon’s and peribulbar/retrobulbar respectively. Complication rates were higher for sharp needle anaesthesia (peribulbar/retrobulbar) in patients taking warfarin rather than direct oral anticoagulants (4.8% vs 3.1%; p = 0.024). Considerable variation was observed between centres on anaesthetic choices and anaesthetic complication rates.
Conclusions:
Combined topical and intracameral is the most common choice of anaesthesia for cataract surgery in the United Kingdom and is associated with lower anaesthetic-related complication rates than sub-Tenon’s and peribulbar/retrobulbar anaesthesia. Variation in anaesthetic choice exists between centres and between NHS & ISTC sectors.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.