Aim To analyze the concept of cultural alienation Background Culturally diverse populations are increasing nationwide. However, many culturally diverse clients have experienced cultural alienation. Design Rodgerian's method of concept analysis Data Source Literature in CINAHL, PubMed, PsycINFO, JSTOR, Scopus, LGBT Life, and Oxford Bibliographic databases were searched. Inclusion criteria were full text, peer‐reviewed, English language, and published within 5 years. Review Methods Articles were read in their entirety and reread to determine more contextual data. Antecedents, attributes, and consequences were extracted. Results Fifteen studies were included. Antecedents included: identification with racial, ethnic, sexual minority, disability, chronic illness, and threat to way of life. Attributes were traditional, different, negotiator, preserving, and sustaining. Consequences resulted in sociocultural deprivation, resistance, mistrust, distrust, loss of identity, and racism. Conclusions Nurses, health care providers, and communities can better support and engage their clients by working together to create an inclusive environment, in which exists a safe space to work, play, and heal. Findings highlight the need to examine one's own assumptions, inquire about the client's cultural care needs, tailor communication at the client's level, acknowledge individual strengths, provide empathetic support, and promote autonomy.

The increase in births to Southeast and East Asian (SEEA) immigrants in their adopted countries is of international importance. SEEA women experience the postpartum period differently than that of the general population. Despite the documented difference, there is limited representation of SEEA women in the literature. The purpose of this meta‐ethnography is to synthesise the qualitative findings from different research studies examining the experiences of SEEA immigrant women during the first 4–6 weeks of the postpartum period and has been written in adherence with enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research (PRISMA). Noblit and Hare's meta‐ethnographic approach was used. Seven articles (four qualitative and three mixed‐methods studies) were reviewed, analysed and synthesised. Four themes emerged: two were facilitators of birth culture (availability and quality of social support and maternity care provider cultural knowledge and response) and two were barriers to birth culture (lack of structural and social support and cultural alienation after childbirth). Due to lack of structural and social support in SEEA immigrant women's adopted countries, they also experienced social and economic hardships after childbirth and made conscious decisions to modify their postpartum cultural practices out of convenience and practicality. SEEA immigrant women also experienced discrimination from maternity care providers, which prevented them from fully engaging in postpartum cultural practices. Maternity care providers can advocate and intervene for SEEA immigrant women by eliciting any postpartum cultural beliefs, assess their social and economic needs early on in prenatal care and make culturally congruent referrals based on those assessments.

The purpose of this article is to critically analyze the concept of self-perceived burden. The Rodgers Evolutionary Model is augmented with concept critique, a dialogic process grounded in critical hermeneutics. Self-perceived burden is a relatively mature concept with psychological, relational, and dimensional attributes that are shaped by culture and sociopolitical structures. The antecedents are demographics, circumstances, diagnoses, symptoms, prognosis, comorbidities, and knowledge and beliefs. The consequences are psychological, decisional, relational, and existential. Sociocultural factors such as universal health coverage, Confucian ethics, Buddhist/Taoist ethics, karma, and individualist-versus communitarianbased relationships are brought to light. Psychological and relational antecedents and consequences of self-perceived burden were found to be salient.

No abstract

The crucible of the COVIDicene distills critical issues for nursing knowledge as we navigate our dystopian present while unpacking our oppressive past and reimagining a radical future. Using Barbara Carper's patterns of knowing as a jumping-off point, the authors instigate provocations around traditional disciplinary theorizing for how to value, ground, develop, and position knowledge as nurses. The pandemic has presented nurses with opportunities to shift toward creating a more inclusive and just epistemology. Moving forward, we propose an unfettering of the patterns of knowing, centering emancipatory knowing, ultimately resulting in liberating the patterns from siloization, cocreating justice for praxis.