No abstract

Introduction: In recent decades, the dramatic rise of obesity among youth in the US has been accompanied by a rise in the prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) in this population. This alarming trend underscores the importance of conducting trials to evaluate new therapies in children with T2D. Methods: A targeted review of peer-reviewed literature and trials registered on www. clinicaltrials.gov was conducted in January 2021 to identify pharmaceutical interventional studies in youth with T2D. Information regarding enrollment data, study design elements, subjects' baseline characteristics, and key treatment outcomes was documented. Results: Among the 16 clinical studies included in this review, only five appeared to meet projected enrollment targets in \ 4 years. Although three other studies met recruitment targets, two took approximately 5 years to complete and the third took nearly 10 years. Conclusions: Despite legislation requiring evaluation of pharmaceutical treatments in pediatric populations, surprisingly few interventional studies have been conducted in children with T2D. This review highlights that recruitment challenges may be impeding the conduct and completion of interventional studies. Consequently, few pharmaceutical treatments have been proven to be effective and approved for children with T2D. Metformin and liraglutide remain the only non-insulin treatments formally approved in the US for use in this population. More clinical research is needed to support regulatory decision-making as well as treatment decisions for children with T2D in clinical settings. Sponsors and investigators will need to implement strategies for improving trial enrollment as well as work with regulatory agencies to develop novel study designs that may require fewer patients.

Aims: Familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS) is a rare genetic disorder with no currently approved therapies. Treatments are in development, and cost-utility analyses will be needed to examine their value. These models will require health state utilities representing FCS. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to estimate utilities for FCS and an associated episode of acute pancreatitis (AP). Methods: Because it is not feasible to gather a large enough sample of patients with this extremely rare condition to complete standardized preference-based measures, vignette-based methods were used to estimate utilities. In time trade-off interviews, general population participants in the UK and Canada valued health state vignettes drafted based on literature review, clinician input, and interviews with patients. Four health states described variations of FCS. A fifth health state, describing AP, was added to one of the other health states to evaluate its impact on utility. Results: A total of 308 participants provided utility data (208 UK; 100 Canada). Mean utilities for FCS health states ranged from 0.46 to 0.83, with higher triglycerides, more severe symptoms, and a history of AP associated with lower utility values. The disutility (i.e. utility decrease) of AP ranged from -0.17 to -0.25, with variations depending on the health state to which it was added. Utility means were similar in the UK and Canada. Conclusions: The vignette-based approach is useful for estimating utilities of a rare disease. The health state utilities derived in this study would be useful in models examining cost-effectiveness of treatments for FCS.

Background Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy provides effective treatment for large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Cost-utility analyses examining and comparing the value of these treatments require health state utilities representing key characteristics to differentiate among therapies. This study estimated utilities for adverse events (AEs) associated with CAR T-cell therapy, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurological events (NEs). Methods Health state vignettes were drafted based on literature review, AE reports from a trial of CAR T-cell therapy, and clinician input. Health states were valued in time trade-off interviews with general population participants in the UK. The first vignette described relapsed/refractory LBCL treated with CAR T-cell therapy without AEs. Five other vignettes had the same LBCL and treatment description, with the addition of an AE. Disutilities (i.e., utility decrease) associated with these AEs were calculated by subtracting the utility of the health state without AEs from those of the other health states. Results Interviews were completed with 218 participants (50% male; mean age 49 years). Mean (standard deviation [SD]) utility for CAR T-cell therapy without AEs was 0.73 (0.30). Mean (SD) disutilities associated with CRS were −0.01 (0.04) for grade 1, −0.05 (0.09) for grade 2, and −0.23 (0.24) for grade 3/4. Mean (SD) disutilities associated with NEs were −0.04 (0.07) for grade 1/2 and −0.18 (0.22) for grade 3/4. Conclusions More severe AEs were associated with greater disutilities. Health state utilities estimated in this study may be useful in cost-effectiveness models examining the value of CAR T-cell therapy in patients with LBCL.

No abstract