Currently, a challenge in electrical stimulation of the retina with a visual prosthesis (bionic eye) is to excite only the cells lying directly under the electrode in the ganglion cell layer, while avoiding excitation of axon bundles that pass over the surface of the retina in the nerve fiber layer. Stimulation of overlying axons results in irregular visual percepts, limiting perceptual efficacy. This research explores how differences in fiber orientation between the nerve fiber layer and ganglion cell layer leads to differences in the electrical activation of the axon initial segment and axons of passage. Approach. Axons of passage of retinal ganglion cells in the nerve fiber layer are characterized by a narrow distribution of fiber orientations, causing highly anisotropic spread of applied current. In contrast, proximal axons in the ganglion cell layer have a wider distribution of orientations. A four-layer computational model of epiretinal extracellular stimulation that captures the effect of neurite orientation in anisotropic tissue has been developed using a volume conductor model known as the cellular composite model. Simulations are conducted to investigate the interaction of neural tissue orientation, stimulating electrode configuration, and stimulation pulse duration and amplitude. Main results. Our model shows that simultaneous stimulation with multiple electrodes aligned with the nerve fiber layer can be used to achieve selective activation of axon initial segments rather than passing fibers. This result can be achieved while reducing required stimulus charge density and with only modest increases in the spread of activation in the ganglion cell layer, and is shown to extend to the general case of arbitrary electrode array positioning and arbitrary target volume. Significance. These results elucidate a strategy for more targeted stimulation of retinal ganglion cells with experimentally-relevant multi-electrode geometries and achievable stimulation requirements.

Examining degrees of stability in attachment throughout early childhood is important for understanding developmental pathways and for informing intervention. Updating and building upon all prior meta-analyses, this study aimed to determine levels of stability in all forms of attachment classifications across early childhood. Attachment stability was assessed between three developmental epochs within early childhood: infancy, toddlerhood, and preschool/early school. To ensure data homogeneity, only studies that assessed attachment with methods based on the strange situation procedure were included. Results indicate moderate levels of stability at both the four-way (secure, avoidant, resistant, and disorganised; κ = 0.23) and secure/insecure (r = 0.28) levels of assessment. Meta-regression analysis indicated security to be the most stable attachment organisation. This study also found evidence for publication bias, highlighting a preference for the publication of significant findings.

This result establishes that the biophysical basis of the electrical receptive field of the linear-nonlinear model is the superposition of transmembrane currents induced by different electrodes at and near the site of action potential initiation. Together with existing experimental support for linear-nonlinear models of electrical stimulation, this provides a firm basis for using this much simplified model to generate more optimal stimulation patterns for retinal implants.

Table of contentsA1 Functional advantages of cell-type heterogeneity in neural circuitsTatyana O. SharpeeA2 Mesoscopic modeling of propagating waves in visual cortexAlain DestexheA3 Dynamics and biomarkers of mental disordersMitsuo KawatoF1 Precise recruitment of spiking output at theta frequencies requires dendritic h-channels in multi-compartment models of oriens-lacunosum/moleculare hippocampal interneuronsVladislav Sekulić, Frances K. SkinnerF2 Kernel methods in reconstruction of current sources from extracellular potentials for single cells and the whole brainsDaniel K. Wójcik, Chaitanya Chintaluri, Dorottya Cserpán, Zoltán SomogyváriF3 The synchronized periods depend on intracellular transcriptional repression mechanisms in circadian clocks.Jae Kyoung Kim, Zachary P. Kilpatrick, Matthew R. Bennett, Kresimir JosićO1 Assessing irregularity and coordination of spiking-bursting rhythms in central pattern generatorsIrene Elices, David Arroyo, Rafael Levi, Francisco B. Rodriguez, Pablo VaronaO2 Regulation of top-down processing by cortically-projecting parvalbumin positive neurons in basal forebrainEunjin Hwang, Bowon Kim, Hio-Been Han, Tae Kim, James T. McKenna, Ritchie E. Brown, Robert W. McCarley, Jee Hyun ChoiO3 Modeling auditory stream segregation, build-up and bistabilityJames Rankin, Pamela Osborn Popp, John RinzelO4 Strong competition between tonotopic neural ensembles explains pitch-related dynamics of auditory cortex evoked fieldsAlejandro Tabas, André Rupp, Emili Balaguer-BallesterO5 A simple model of retinal response to multi-electrode stimulationMatias I. Maturana, David B. Grayden, Shaun L. Cloherty, Tatiana Kameneva, Michael R. Ibbotson, Hamish MeffinO6 Noise correlations in V4 area correlate with behavioral performance in visual discrimination taskVeronika Koren, Timm Lochmann, Valentin Dragoi, Klaus ObermayerO7 Input-location dependent gain modulation in cerebellar nucleus neuronsMaria Psarrou, Maria Schilstra, Neil Davey, Benjamin Torben-Nielsen, Volker SteuberO8 Analytic solution of cable energy function for cortical axons and dendritesHuiwen Ju, Jiao Yu, Michael L. Hines, Liang Chen, Yuguo YuO9 C. elegans interactome: interactive visualization of Caenorhabditis elegans worm neuronal networkJimin Kim, Will Leahy, Eli ShlizermanO10 Is the model any good? Objective criteria for computational neuroscience model selectionJustas Birgiolas, Richard C. Gerkin, Sharon M. CrookO11 Cooperation and competition of gamma oscillation mechanismsAtthaphon Viriyopase, Raoul-Martin Memmesheimer, Stan GielenO12 A discrete structure of the brain wavesYuri Dabaghian, Justin DeVito, Luca PerottiO13 Direction-specific silencing of the Drosophila gaze stabilization systemAnmo J. Kim, Lisa M. Fenk, Cheng Lyu, Gaby MaimonO14 What does the fruit fly think about values? A model of olfactory associative learningChang Zhao, Yves Widmer, Simon Sprecher,Walter SennO15 Effects of ionic diffusion on power spectra of local field potentials (LFP)Geir Halnes, Tuomo Mäki-Marttunen, Daniel Keller, Klas H. Pettersen,Ole A. Andreassen...

Objective. Retinal prostheses aim to restore vision in patients with retinal degenerative diseases, such as age-related macular degeneration and retinitis pigmentosa. By implanting an array of microelectrodes, such a device creates percepts in patients through electrical stimulation of surviving retinal neurons. A challenge for retinal prostheses when trying to return high quality vision is the unintended activation of retinal ganglion cells through the stimulation of passing axon bundles, which leads to patients reporting large, elongated patches of light instead of focal spots. Approach. In this work, we used calcium imaging to record the responses of retinal ganglion cells to electrical stimulation in explanted retina using rectangular electrodes placed with different orientations relative to the axon bundles. Main results. We showed that narrow, rectangular electrodes oriented parallel to the axon bundles can achieve focal stimulation. To further improve the strategy, we studied the impact of different stimulation waveforms and electrode configurations. We found the selectivity for focal stimulation to be higher when using short (33 μs), anodic-first biphasic pulses, with long electrode lengths and at least 50 μm electrode-to-retinal separation. Focal stimulation was, in fact, less selective when the electrodes made direct contact with the retinal surface due to unwanted preferential stimulation of the proximal axon bundles. Significance. When employed in retinal prostheses, the proposed stimulation strategy is expected to provide improved quality of vision to the blind.