No abstract

There are now several well-documented SSBs from both prokaryotes and eukaryotes that function in replication, recombination, and repair; however, no "consensus" view of their interactions with ssDNA has emerged. Although these proteins all bind preferentially and with high affinity to ssDNA, their modes of binding to ssDNA in vitro, including whether they bind with cooperativity, often differ dramatically. This point is most clear upon comparing the properties of the phage T4 gene 32 protein and the E. coli SSB protein. Depending on the solution conditions, Eco SSB can bind ssDNA in several different modes, which display quite different properties, including cooperativity. The wide range of interactions with ssDNA observed for Eco SSB is due principally to its tetrameric structure and the fact that each SSB protomer (subunit) can bind ssDNA. This reflects a major difference between Eco SSB and the T4 gene 32 protein, which binds DNA as a monomer and displays "unlimited" positive cooperativity in its binding to ssDNA. The Eco SSB tetramer can bind ssDNA with at least two different types of nearest-neighbor positive cooperativity ("limited" and "unlimited"), as well as negative cooperativity among the subunits within an individual tetramer. In fact, this latter property, which is dependent upon salt concentration and nucleotide base composition, is a major factor influencing whether ssDNA interacts with all four or only two SSB subunits, which in turn determines the type of intertetramer positive cooperativity. Hence, it is clear that the interactions of Eco SSB with ssDNA are quite different from those of T4 gene 32 protein, and the idea that all SSBs bind to ssDNA as does the T4 gene 32 protein must be amended. Although it is not yet known which of the Eco SSB-binding modes is functionally important in vivo, it is possible that some of the modes are used preferentially in different DNA metabolic processes. In any event, the vastly different properties of the Eco SSB-binding modes must be considered in studies of DNA replication, recombination, and repair in vitro. Since eukaryotic mitochondrial SSBs as well as SSBs encoded by prokaryotic conjugative plasmids are highly similar to Eco SSB, these proteins are likely to show similar complexities. However, based on their heterotrimeric subunit composition, the eukaryotic nuclear SSBs (RP-A proteins) are significantly different from either Eco SSB or T4 gene 32 proteins. Further subclassification of these proteins must await more detailed biochemical and biophysical studies.

Single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) is an essential intermediate in various DNA metabolic processes and interacts with a large number of proteins. Due to its flexibility, the conformations of ssDNA in solution can only be described using statistical approaches, such as flexibly jointed or worm-like chain models. However, there is limited data available to assess such models quantitatively, especially for describing the flexibility of short ssDNA and RNA. To address this issue, we performed FRET studies of a series of oligodeoxythymidylates, (dT)N, over a wide range of salt concentrations and chain lengths (10 < or = N < or = 70 nucleotides), which provide systematic constraints for testing theoretical models. Unlike in mechanical studies where available ssDNA conformations are averaged out during the time it takes to perform measurements, fluorescence lifetimes may act here as an internal clock that influences fluorescence signals depending on how fast the ssDNA conformations fluctuate. A reasonably good agreement could be obtained between our data and the worm-like chain model provided that limited relaxations of the ssDNA conformations occur within the fluorescence lifetime of the donor. The persistence length thus estimated ranges from 1.5 nm in 2 M NaCl to 3 nm in 25 mM NaCl.

Crystal structures of binary and ternary complexes of the E. coli Rep helicase bound to single-stranded (ss) DNA or ssDNA and ADP were determined to a resolution of 3.0 A and 3.2 A, respectively. The asymmetric unit in the crystals contains two Rep monomers differing from each other by a large reorientation of one of the domains, corresponding to a swiveling of 130 degrees about a hinge region. Such domain movements are sufficiently large to suggest that these may be coupled to translocation of the Rep dimer along DNA. The ssDNA binding site involves the helicase motifs Ia, III, and V, whereas the ADP binding site involves helicase motifs I and IV. Residues in motifs II and VI may function to transduce the allosteric effects of nucleotides on DNA binding. These structures represent the first view of a DNA helicase bound to DNA.

DNA helicases are essential motor proteins that function to unwind duplex DNA to yield the transient single-stranded DNA intermediates required for replication, recombination, and repair. These enzymes unwind duplex DNA and translocate along DNA in reactions that are coupled to the binding and hydrolysis of 5'-nucleoside triphosphates (NTP). Although these enzymes are essential for DNA metabolism, the molecular details of their mechanisms are only beginning to emerge. This review discusses mechanistic aspects of helicase-catalyzed DNA unwinding and translocation with a focus on energetic (thermodynamic), kinetic, and structural studies of the few DNA helicases for which such information is available. Recent studies of DNA and NTP binding and DNA unwinding by the Escherichia coli (E. coli) Rep helicase suggest that the Rep helicase dimer unwinds DNA by an active, rolling mechanism. In fact, DNA helicases appear to be generally oligomeric (usually dimers or hexamers), which provides the helicase with multiple DNA binding sites. The apparent mechanistic similarities and differences among these DNA helicases are discussed.