Successful treatment of sinonasal disease may require postoperative delivery of topical therapies. Draf III frontal sinusotomy achieves superior topical access, and access to the frontal sinus with Draf IIa appears limited, despite large volumes and positioning.

Background Nasal irrigation is a significant component of effective medical management in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Irrigations facilitate distribution of topical medical therapies to affected mucosal surfaces and lavage of hypersecretory mucin and inflammatory products. Objective To compare the effectiveness of cadaveric nasal irrigation distribution and force following different surgical techniques commonly used to open the maxillary sinus. Methods Fresh human cadaver heads were dissected sequentially with uncinectomy, maxillary antrostomy, endoscopic maxillary mega-antrostomy, and modified endoscopic medial maxillectomy. After each surgical technique was performed, the corresponding nasal cavity was irrigated with 240 mL irrigation bottles containing 1/1000 10% fluroscein-labeled free water. A nasal endoscope passed through the canine fossa into a fixed position in the maxillary sinus recorded the extent of sinus irrigation. These videos then underwent blinded assessment by 2 observers assessing for irrigation sinus penetration (scored as 0–4) and force (0–2). Ordinal correlation scores were assessed using Kendall’s tau-B. Results A total of 17 sinuses (age 53.4 ± 12.6, 36.4% female) were assessed. There was a statistically significant positive correlation between increasing extent of maxillary sinus dissection and both sinus penetration and force as assessed by both observers (Kendall’s tau-B P < .0001). Conclusion Increasing the extent of surgical dissection appears to improve penetration and force of the nasal irrigation into the maxillary sinus. This study suggests that while a standard maxillary antrostomy may be sufficient to achieve good topical therapy distribution, more extensive surgery such as a modified medial maxillectomy may be required for sufficient force of sinus lavage.

BackgroundNew standardised parenteral nutrition (SPN) formulations were implemented in July 2011 in many neonatal intensive care units in New South Wales following consensus group recommendations. The aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of new consensus formulations in preterm infants born less than 32 weeks.MethodsA before-after intervention study conducted at a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit. Data from the post-consensus cohort (2011 to 2012) were prospectively collected and compared retrospectively with a pre-consensus cohort of neonates (2010).ResultsPost-consensus group commenced parenteral nutrition (PN) significantly earlier (6 v 11 hours of age, p 0.005). In comparison to the pre-consensus cohort, there was a higher protein intake from day 1 (1.34 v 0.49 g/kg, p 0.000) to day 7 (3.55 v 2.35 g/kg, p 0.000), higher caloric intake from day 1 (30 v 26 kcal/kg, p 0.004) to day 3 (64 v 62 kcal/kg, p 0.026), and less daily fluid intake from day 3 (105.8 v 113.8 mL/kg, p 0.011) to day 7 (148.8 v 156.2 mL/kg, p 0.025), and reduced duration of lipid therapy (253 v 475 hr, p 0.011). This group also had a significantly greater weight gain in the first 4 weeks (285 v 220 g, p 0.003).ConclusionsNew consensus SPN solutions provided better protein intake in the first 7 days and were associated with greater weight gain in the first 4 weeks. However, protein intake on day 1 was below the consensus goal of 2 g/kg/day.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12887-014-0309-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Symptomatic vocal cord paralysis is an extremely rare complication of oesophageal dilatation or stent insertion, with only two previously reported cases described in the literature. In both cases, paralysis was suggested to be caused by recurrent laryngeal nerve compression from stent or dilatation.We present the case of a 63 year old female who developed immediate postoperative aphonia following a proximal oesophageal dilatation procedure for strictures. Flexible nasendoscopy of the larynx identified complete left sided vocal cord paresis causing her symptoms, which was presumed to be a complication of the dilatation.Keywords: Vocal cord; Paralysis; Esophageal; Dilatation; Iatrogenic

PurposeTo assess the validity of home sleep apnea test directed diagnosis and treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in a real-life clinical setting and establish the extent to which clinical evaluation alters diagnosis and therapeutic intervention, in the context of the evolving realm of precision medicine.MethodsRetrospective consecutive cohort study of 505 patients referred to a single center between 15th September 2015 to 14th September 2016, multidisciplinary specialist sleep clinic presenting with a home sleep apnea test prior to referral. We evaluated the effect of sleep medicine practitioner (SMP) and ear, nose, and throat surgeon (ENTS) review on patient diagnoses, disease severity, and management options in OSA.ResultsHundred and fifteen patients were included. Repeat evaluation with in-lab polysomnogram (PSG) was required in 46/115 (40.0%) of patients, of which 20/46 (43.5%) had OSA severity changed. Sleep medicine practitioner review decreased the need for repeat testing with formal in-lab PSG (p &lt; 0.05) and increased patient acceptance of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) as a long-term management option for OSA. Sleep medicine practitioner/ENTS review resulted in discovery of a non-OSA related sleep disorder or change in OSA severity in 47.8% (55/115). Ear, nose, and throat surgeon review resulted in additional or changed diagnosis in 75.7% (87/115) of patients.ConclusionIn the clinical assessment and diagnosis of OSA, patients should be reviewed by medical practitioners with an interest in sleep disorders to better navigate the complexities of assessment, as well as the identification of co-morbid conditions.