Introduction The success of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF) may be improved if stable AF sources identified by Focal Impulse and Rotor Mapping (FIRM) are also eliminated. The long-term results of this approach are unclear outside the centers where FIRM was developed; thus, we assessed outcomes of FIRM-guided AF ablation in the first cases at 10 experienced centers. Methods We prospectively enrolled n = 78 consecutive patients (61 ± 10 years) undergoing FIRM guided ablation for persistent (n = 48), longstanding persistent (n = 7), or paroxysmal (n = 23) AF. AF recordings from both atria with a 64-pole basket catheter were analyzed using a novel mapping system (Rhythm View™; Topera Inc., CA, USA). Identified rotors/focal sources were ablated, followed by PVI. Results Each institution recruited a median of 6 patients, each of whom showed 2.3 ± 0.9 AF rotors/focal sources in diverse locations. 25.3% of all sources were right atrial (RA), and 50.0% of patients had ≥1 RA source. Ablation of all sources required a total of 16.6 ± 11.7 minutes, followed by PVI. On >1 year follow-up with a 3-month blanking period, 1 patient lost to follow-up (median time to 1st recurrence: 245 days, IQR 145–354), single-procedure freedom from AF was 87.5% (patients without prior ablation; 35/40) and 80.5% (all patients; 62/77) and similar for persistent and paroxysmal AF (P = 0.89). Conclusions Elimination of patient-specific AF rotors/focal sources produced freedom-from-AF of ≈80% at 1 year at centers new to FIRM. FIRM-guided ablation has a rapid learning curve, yielding similar results to original FIRM reports in each center’s first cases.

Objectives To determine if ablation that targets patient-specific AF-sustaining substrates (rotors or focal sources) is more durable than trigger ablation alone at preventing late AF recurrences. Background Late recurrence substantially limits the efficacy of pulmonary vein (PV) isolation for AF, and is associated with PV reconnection and the emergence of new triggers. Methods We performed 3 year follow-up of the CONFIRM trial, in which 92 consecutive AF patients (70.7% persistent) underwent novel computational mapping to reveal a median of 2 (IQR 1–2) rotors or focal sources in 97.7% of patients during AF. Ablation comprised source (Focal Impulse and Rotor Modulation, FIRM) then conventional ablation in n=27 (FIRM-guided), and conventional ablation alone in n=65 (FIRM-blinded). Patients were followed with implanted ECG monitors when possible (85.2% FIRM guided, 23.1% FIRM-blinded). Results On 890 days follow-up (median; IQR 224–1563) compared FIRM-blinded therapy, patients receiving FIRM-guided ablation maintained higher freedom from AF after 1.2±0.4 procedures (median 1, IQR 1–1) (77.8% vs 38.5%; p=0.001) and a single procedure (p>0.001), and higher freedom from all atrial arrhythmias (p=0.003). Freedom from AF was higher when ablation directly or coincidentally passed through sources than when it missed sources (p>0.001). CONCLUSIONS FIRM-guided ablation is more durable than conventional trigger-based ablation at preventing 3 year AF recurrence. Future studies should investigate how ablation of patient-specific AF-sustaining rotors and focal sources alters the natural history of arrhythmia recurrence.

In controlled studies, the addition of AF driver ablation to PVI supports the possible benefit of a combined approach of AF driver ablation and PVI in improving single-procedure freedom from all arrhythmias. However, most studies are uncontrolled and are limited by substantial heterogeneity in outcomes. Large multicenter randomized trials are needed to precisely define the benefits of adding driver ablation to PVI.